Burqa Controversy brews up in Australia.

[mazHur]

anyway.....being a muslim must be good for a man....a wife for every day of the week except sunday when you need a rest

No need to be a Muslim for that.. engage 4 women at a time (if you can!) --
4women X 6 days each=24 days
Balance 6 days for rest during periods!!
Howz that??

 

[retro]

I haven't checked but due to your eating my brain with your negative fixations I too may have got mixed up
on the subtle difference...of the two terms. Anyway, now it's clear and no need to pick..


For that you must visit some Muslim country...but as far as i know there is NO discrimination against non-Muslims beyoond what the respective Laws and Constitution of such a country may have.
Naturally, if the Constitution or Laws of America prohibit taking 4 wives no one can do that there...but in Egypt that is Okay!!Right?

Try to understand that YOUR laws are NOT universal...none are!! And we ought to respect other people's religions, customs and culture without slinging mud at them just because they sound to us peculiar or different.

So you're saying that it's okay for Muslim countries to enact laws that are discriminatory towards religions other than Islam?

 

[mazHur]

So you're saying that it's okay for Muslim countries to enact laws that are discriminatory towards religions other than Islam?

No, but we also cannot expect them to enact OUR laws!

 

[Dana]

stop fantasizing....your on a diet:nod:

i dunno if u dunno but its a movie quote...

 

[retro]

No, but we also cannot expect them to enact OUR laws!

So you've changed your tune again. You were claiming earlier that there was no discrimination against Christian in Muslim countries. Now you're saying that there is. Which is it?

 

[mazHur]

So you've changed your tune again. You were claiming earlier that there was no discrimination against Christian in Muslim countries. Now you're saying that there is. Which is it?

What's so funny about it?? Is there any law, for example, which can force a Hindu to eat beef, a Muslim and a Jew to eat pork, or a Sikh to smoke tobacco??? NO. Constitutional and legal binding, just as they bind the Americans, are typical to every country, Muslim or non- Muslim. for example in a country like Japan a man isn't allowed Japanese nationality even if he marries a Japanese girl but this is not so in America or EU. Would you call that 'discrimination' as you blame Muslim countries????



I am not here to teach comparative governments and constitutions of the world to tweenies like you,
you better ought to join some school!!

 

[skyblue]

at the end of the day if the aussies ban the burka people will just have to accept it and not bleat about descrimination

 

[Minor Axis]

at the end of the day if the aussies ban the burka people will just have to accept it and not bleat about descrimination

Why is that?

 

[skyblue]

because every country has its own laws and rules......you move there and you should abide by them

 

[Peter Parka]

because every country has its own laws and rules......you move there and you should abide by them

You seem to be under the false impression that there arn't lots of Muslims who were born in Australia.

 

[mazHur]

You seem to be under the false impression that there arn't lots of Muslims who were born in Australia.

well said and would that justify Australia as a secular state????

 

[Peter Parka]

well said and would that justify Australia as a secular state????

Also, if we're going to go down the road of Ian's beliefs, Australia should ban certain Christian beliefs too because the original inhabitants of Oz were Aboriginals who had their own beliefs, if the Christians dont like it they can fuck of back the UK or Greece or wherever their great great great great granddad came from.

 

[mazHur]

Also, if we're going to go down the road of Ian's beliefs, Australia should ban certain Christian beliefs too because the original inhabitants of Oz were Aboriginals who had their own beliefs, if the Christians dont like it they can fuck of back the UK or Greece or wherever their great great great great granddad came from.

hehehehehe!!! thumbs up!

 

[porterjack]

Also, if we're going to go down the road of Ian's beliefs, Australia should ban certain Christian beliefs too because the original inhabitants of Oz were Aboriginals who had their own beliefs, if the Christians dont like it they can fuck of back the UK or Greece or wherever their great great great great granddad came from.

i predict a response beginning with the word

right,

 

[retro]

What's so funny about it?? Is there any law, for example, which can force a Hindu to eat beef, a Muslim and a Jew to eat pork, or a Sikh to smoke tobacco??? NO. Constitutional and legal binding, just as they bind the Americans, are typical to every country, Muslim or non- Muslim. for example in a country like Japan a man isn't allowed Japanese nationality even if he marries a Japanese girl but this is not so in America or EU. Would you call that 'discrimination' as you blame Muslim countries????



I am not here to teach comparative governments and constitutions of the world to tweenies like you,
you better ought to join some school!!

I didn't say anything was funny, please pay attention.

So, by your definition, it's okay for Muslim countries to create laws that discriminate against Christians and other religions. If that is the case, then it should be okay for "secular" or even "Christian" countries to enact laws that discriminate against Islam. Like banning the burqa.

 

[skyblue]

Also, if we're going to go down the road of Ian's beliefs, Australia should ban certain Christian beliefs too because the original inhabitants of Oz were Aboriginals who had their own beliefs, if the Christians dont like it they can fuck of back the UK or Greece or wherever their great great great great granddad came from.

correct me if i'm wrong......perhaps an aussie knows,but aren't the aboriginals starting to get some of they're lands back?

 

[Minor Axis]

because every country has its own laws and rules......you move there and you should abide by them

So if a law discriminates against people, the populace has no grounds to question? If you say so. :smiley24:

 

[Peter Parka]

correct me if i'm wrong......perhaps an aussie knows,but aren't the aboriginals starting to get some of they're lands back?

Well the government last year finally apologised to them for the stolen generation which went on into the 70s so I guess that's a start, still even later than the USA, but a start.:thumbup

 

[mazHur]

I didn't say anything was funny, please pay attention.

So, by your definition, it's okay for Muslim countries to create laws that discriminate against Christians and other religions. If that is the case, then it should be okay for "secular" or even "Christian" countries to enact laws that discriminate against Islam. Like banning the burqa.

We are NOT talking about suppositions...IF and Buts..No...you keep conjecturing and surmising, none of my business to change the world!!

 

[retro]

We are NOT talking about suppositions...IF and Buts..No...you keep conjecturing and surmising, none of my business to change the world!!

I'm sorry, but does that sentence come in coherent? If it does, please post that version instead.