Wow so many of them.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
Credible critics of the official account of 9/11
- Thread starter kelvin070
- Start date
"General Stubblebine: I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane."
Should have gone to Specsavers.
Should have gone to Specsavers.
here we go with the conspiracy theories. they never get old, do they? lol
I guess he does have a point though, these could have fallen off a large bird or something. :24:
Its still being debated in most of the forums.
It always will be, but nothing will ever come of it. Kennedy assassination anyone?
Huh, you killed the thread
there are just way to many questions that don't have anwswers to them....answers that make sense.
I have a theory. I believe there is a secret committee of international conspiracists creating rumor of conspiracies to distract from the real truth: that every single major occurrence in the world is a carefully planned event executed by groups of well-coordinated and meticulously trained secret operatives. 
cool
cool
I have a theory. I believe there is a secret committee of international conspiracists creating rumor of conspiracies to distract from the real truth: that every single major occurrence in the world is a carefully planned event executed by groups of well-coordinated and meticulously trained secret operatives.
yes. b/c this world and country is based on nothing but the truth :smiley24:
I guess all those people sitting inside the building that watched an airplane fly into their building must all be in on the plot too.
/discussion
/discussion
i don't think there is a plot about anything but the planes hitting the buildings...i know they weren't birds. But they're deaths...what a waste.
Uh, like what?
This is an interesting site relating to this.
AE911Truth
these fellows have a pretty good idea as to what brings down a building, and they don't believe WTC collapsed solely due to the planes flying into it...
If you read through, or even better watch the speech, they make some excellent points.
AE911Truth
these fellows have a pretty good idea as to what brings down a building, and they don't believe WTC collapsed solely due to the planes flying into it...
If you read through, or even better watch the speech, they make some excellent points.
They probably don't, since thousands of engineers and architects have reviewed the incident and see no conspiracy anywhere.
Odds are they are pretty much just riding the "9/11 truth wave" to make money. Look at all of the advertisements for their products.
Odds are they are pretty much just riding the "9/11 truth wave" to make money. Look at all of the advertisements for their products.
Last edited by a moderator:
well it would certainly be a good way to make a bundle of money and get your name out there...
I watched the documentary, they make some very interesting points. They're not proposing any conspiracy theories, just asking questions about the truth behind the event...
Are you surprised that so many engineers and architects have found nothing untoward? Everyone that dares to question the official story gets labelled a conspiracy nut! They probably daren't risk their careers. ..
People hide behind "Oh, we're not saying it was a conspiracy! We just want to find THE TRUTH!"
Well, no, you guys ARE implying that there is a conspiracy because you're looking for one when you say you want to find "the truth" behind the incident.
The truth is, a few planes got hijacked by Islamic extremists, which has happened many times before, and crashed them into buildings where the structural integrity was compromised and weakee3ned. This led to their collapse.
Well, no, you guys ARE implying that there is a conspiracy because you're looking for one when you say you want to find "the truth" behind the incident.
The truth is, a few planes got hijacked by Islamic extremists, which has happened many times before, and crashed them into buildings where the structural integrity was compromised and weakee3ned. This led to their collapse.
oh yeah, their near-perfect collapse! That's what bothers me the most about the whole thing - the way those towers fell, the official story makes no sense what so ever...
Near perfect? Any engineer can tell you that those collapses were far from "perfect".
What about the official story makes no sense?
What about the official story makes no sense?