You didn't get mad......

Users who are viewing this thread

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Here is my rambling response...

This is what happens- many conservatives think the Republican Party represents their wishes so that's how they vote. Liberals think the same thing about Democrats. Some conservatives think Liberterian is the way to go. Independents go with whomever seems the least crazy for the current election and matches their natural conservative, moderate, or liberal leanings. Bottom line you have disasters like Bush voted into office, not just once, but twice because people vote party over competence. This happens to Democrats to. And most of the voters are just plain stupid, latching on to whatever media pundit matches their philosophical leanings, and they believe everything their source spouts whether it be Fox or MSNBC.

I do think capitalism is the best system in existence, but to be the best and not the worst, the people in power must have a moral basis that values all participants in the economic system. If the smart ones who control the economy lack morality, which today some large percentage clearly do, then government regulation of the workplace is a must for workers to get a fair shake.

If we have government programs, I want them to work for people and be free of fraud. If they don't accomplish that I don't want them. And lacking morality, I want laws in place the protect workers from the moguls. Unfortunately that only happens when you have a pro-labor government in office. Unfortunately when you lack morality, who says your government reps are going to be any better than the greedy business bastards?

Under Obama, if the economy and overall well being of U.S. citizens gets better then I'll be happy. If not, I'll be disillusioned. You know why? Because there will be no viable choice to vote into office.

Conservatives mostly seem to want an unregulated marketplace and/or to ship all the good paying jobs they can overseas to less expensive labor groups. There has been a steady drain of manufacturing overseas for the last 40 years under Reps (and Dems), and it can be argued that dismantling depression era regulations had a direct casual effect of our current economic crisis. Business wants to operate unregulated and business entities try their dam-dest to put friendly pro-business politicians into office, and typically business has the most money to invest in politicians and the political process.

Despite the promises, I believe conservatives if elected, won't have the will to dump all of those expensive government programs that could drain us dry. Instead they will just do their best to help business obtain max profits while kicking the shit out of the workers to achieve it without solving overall problems. They also tend to push bullshit trickle-down economics, clearly a self serving philosophy.

I used to vote Republican but I blame the Republican Party for the current animosity that exists within our politics. They are inflexible, uncompromising, and vilifying. As a result our politics are incredibly polarized and not much of anything is going to get accomplished under the political climate that currently exists in this country. BTW, I don't consider liberals blameless in all of this. They pushed for more home ownership without the proper oversight. When they get the chance, they tend to push for expensive programs that lack proper oversight and fail to be fiscally responsible.

I understand how the group of people on this forum who want smaller government got that way. The government usually fucks it up. I understand and I believe that really is a reasonable approach, except that some of those people voted for Bush because they thought he was the lesser of two evils.

To really solve problems you need a majority of citizens who participate in the process, understand what the limits of government are. Frankly I don't see that happening. Any time any political party wants to "cut" something, like social security, there will be calls for their heads. What does it take to fix this? At this point I really don't see a solution. Does anyone here?

Based on my current prejudices, I'm really happy McCain is not President. The Republican Party is a joke with the Demsocrats in a close second place. Although I'm not ready to call Obama a disaster, believe it or not, that day may come if things turn to shit, or I should say worse shit then they were under the last Administration. At this point in time, I'm more of a pessimist than an optimist that we have the national will to fix our problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 32
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Here is my rambling response...

This is what happens- many conservatives think the Republican Party represents their wishes so that's how they vote. Liberals think the same thing about Democrats. Some conservatives think Liberterian is the way to go. Independents go with whomever seems the least crazy for the current election and matches their natural conservative, moderate, or liberal leanings. Bottom line you have disasters like Bush voted into office, not just once, but twice because people vote party over competence. This happens to Democrats to. And most of the voters are just plain stupid, latching on to whatever media pundit matches their philosophical leanings, and they believe everything their source spouts whether it be Fox or MSNBC.
Excellent balanced point. One needs only to look at the 40-year careers of idiots to really drive your point home.

Minor Axis said:
I do think capitalism is the best system in existence, but to be the best and not the worst, the people in power must have a moral basis that values all participants in the economic system. If the smart ones who control the economy lack morality, which today some large percentage clearly do, then government regulation of the workplace is a must for workers to get a fair shake.

If we have government programs, I want them to work for people and be free of fraud. If they don't accomplish that I don't want them. And lacking morality, I want laws in place the protect workers from the moguls. Unfortunately that only happens when you have a pro-labor government in office. Unfortunately when you lack morality, who says your government reps are going to be any better than the greedy business bastards?
Imo we in the US have overdone separation of church and state and the result is replacement of church with state. Now the gov't decides morality, exactly the situation we were trying to avoid. But that's another thread.

Minor Axis said:
I understand how the group of people on this forum who want smaller government got that way. The government usually fucks it up. I understand and I believe that really is a reasonable approach, except that some of those people voted for Bush because they thought he was the lesser of two evils.

To really solve problems you need a majority of citizens who participate in the process, understand what the limits of government are. Frankly I don't see that happening. Any time any political party wants to "cut" something, like social security, there will be calls for their heads. What does it take to fix this? At this point I really don't see a solution. Does anyone here?
One thing's sure, if we continue to allow them grow by creating more new big gov't programs, the gov't will continue to get bigger and fuck up even more. I'm convinced that if people voted with their hearts and kept their ideals in mind, rather than with their heads and kept their calculators in hand, then virtually none of these idiots would ever get elected.

Minor Axis said:
Based on my current prejudices, I'm really happy McCain is not President. The Republican Party is a joke with the Demsocrats in a close second place. Although I'm not ready to call Obama a disaster, believe it or not, that day may come if things turn to shit, or I should say worse shit then they were under the last Administration. At this point in time, I'm more of a pessimist than an optimist that we have the national will to fix our problems.
We don't have the will. That's obvious by looking at the fact that we're voting in superheroes to swoop in and fix our lives for us. I don't think we even have the spine to throw the bastards out through rebellion.

The country will fail, hopefully after I'm dead but I'm afraid I'll get to see it. I'll just keep trying to keep my circle of influence intact.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
The country will fail, hopefully after I'm dead but I'm afraid I'll get to see it. I'll just keep trying to keep my circle of influence intact.

Thanks for the response. I may have said this before, but this country is starting to feel like the Roman empire in its last days.
 

Hans

Active Member
Messages
1,734
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This thread is ridiculous. At the time when they were current events, people were at arms over those events. Sure, as time goes on and they fade into history the rage dissipates, but that is simply how current events work. As they are no longer current, they are forgotten. This is the nature of modern media/culture.

Have you suddenly forgotten everyone making fun of Bush? The extreme anti-torture protests? The pouring of media against the lack of WMDs in Iraq? How were people not "mad" about it? I just do not understand it at all lol. The country WAS mad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
This thread is ridiculous. At the time when they were current events, people were at arms over those events. Sure, as time goes on and they fade into history the rage dissipates, but that is simply how current events work. As they are no longer current, they are forgotten. This is the nature of modern media/culture.

Have you suddenly forgotten everyone making fun of Bush? The extreme anti-torture protests? The pouring of media against the lack of WMDs in Iraq? How were people not "mad" about it? I just do not understand it at all lol. The country WAS mad.

It was a rhetorical question directed at those who are now outraged at health insurance reform, ie the Right

The Republicans standing up on capital hill screaming that this is the end of the world sat silent with Bush, that is the point...
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Have you suddenly forgotten everyone making fun of Bush? The extreme anti-torture protests? The pouring of media against the lack of WMDs in Iraq? How were people not "mad" about it? I just do not understand it at all lol. The country WAS mad.

Everyone remembers how complicit the media were in most of Bush's decisions and policies. They remember how little attention was given to the protests. And they also are aware at how the current president is having death threats poured at him from the current dissenters.

The country wasn't that mad at Bush, sure, they poked some fun, but nothing like this.

The list points out the hypocrisy of the people complaining now about increased govt when they let Bush get away with it without so much as a peep out of them.
 

Hans

Active Member
Messages
1,734
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I understand the purpose of the post, I just feel that it is silly. Those covering for it I feel either are motivated by political belief or simply did not pay attention to prior information. Or they simply overlook everything so its purpose is made clear. Either way, I just think it is wrong/pointless.

Thanks for the response. I may have said this before, but this country is starting to feel like the Roman empire in its last days.

I missed this post. I have taken an insane amount of Roman/Greek courses. I really dont see how you can agree that Rome/USA has a parrallel of the fall. I am assuming you are talking about the failure of the Empire, rather than the Republic.

We are not having any political leadership issues, as in who has sovreignty to rule. No one currently has enough rhetoric to inspire the people like they previously did. The Roman people are far different than Americans. Although Romans/Americans are suprisingly similar, the Romans were more openly/more able to pursue honor and glory. They were also far more bound to their family than the modern American family.

There are a ton more parrallels to actually support that the fall of Rome is unrelated to the current events in the States, but I am having to leave now!
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I understand the purpose of the post, I just feel that it is silly. Those covering for it I feel either are motivated by political belief or simply did not pay attention to prior information. Or they simply overlook everything so its purpose is made clear. Either way, I just think it is wrong/pointless.

In philosophical discussions, it's never wrong to point out double standards. :) (I don't remember where I made the Roman Empire comment previously, somewhere in all the blabber.)
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top