All Else Failed
Well-Known Member
Thats done with heterosexual couples as well.
What's wrong with homosexuality? I think it's the part where the penis goes into the butt of someone else with a penis.
Thats done with heterosexual couples as well.
Its a fantasy of some men to have strap-ons used on them from their wives. Not a "real" one, but does it really matter?
...then you must really believe that there is a little sponge who lives in a pineapple under the sea just like my three year old. :cool
Here's the stumbling block. Homosexuality is not "same sex copulation". If you read those links you would realise that almost every example of "homosexuality" in animals is actually an example of bi-sexuality. If bi-sexuality exists in the animal kingdom it does not prove homosexuality is natural, rather the opposite, it would seem to illustrate that "homosexuality" doesn't exist naturally but that homosexual men are more likely bi-sexual.
Anal sex is just a type of se and why would it matter than both of them have a penis? anyway, there are a lot of gay people who don't even like anal sex, and only have oral. And are you forgetting the lesbians? sigh...What's wrong with homosexuality? I think it's the part where the penis goes into the butt of someone else with a penis.
That something is on the TV doesn't make it true, of course not. But I do not understan what you want to say, because I could have avoided posting any video and just give the same argument he gave, which I agree with, right?I like the fact that the speaker's video had 24 different breaks in it, cleverly edited no doubt.
I also like the fact that it's very unlikely that Martin Sheen has an encyclopedic knowledge of the Bible, and yet his presidential character even at best probably cherry picks scripture so that it can come out on YouTube and uninformed people can latch on to it and say, "Martin Sheen is the greatest president in history because he can recite lines that are arranged so that he absolutely OWNS a fake Bible thumper! HIP HIP, HOORAY!!!"
No theres actually apes in captivity right now that do not show bi-sexuality at all, but pure homosexuality. I'll try to look for the article and post it later. So no, my links still stand.Here's the stumbling block. Homosexuality is not "same sex copulation". If you read those links you would realise that almost every example of "homosexuality" in animals is actually an example of bi-sexuality. If bi-sexuality exists in the animal kingdom it does not prove homosexuality is natural, rather the opposite, it would seem to illustrate that "homosexuality" doesn't exist naturally but that homosexual men are more likely bi-sexual.
In the first link scientists report that the "homosexual" behaviour is a strategy for finding a heterosexual partner. So that's not very gay is it?
The only cases I've ever seen of completely homosexual, not bi-sexual, animals were found in zoos. So can't be considered "natural behaviour". Or were proved to have been caused by brain damage.
What you have found are 1500 animal species which are bi-sexual. Keep looking.
Even if you read those in context, they are pretty definite statements to make.I believe this is what grace is talking about. The bible was not written in verses it was simply a way for us to reference it easily. Anyone can pick out a verse in the bible somewhere to fit there needs but to actually get the context of what it is talking about the least amount of text you could pick out would be the entire book that it comes out of ie, the entire book of matthew and so on.
I'm not suggesting gay men are really bi-sexual, where did you get that from?No theres actually apes in captivity right now that do not show bi-sexuality at all, but pure homosexuality. I'll try to look for the article and post it later. So no, my links still stand.
Plus, I think you suggesting that gay men are really bi-sexual is a little silly. I know dozens of gay men and women and trust me, they are gay.
The thing is, you have to understand what the word natural means. IF somehting occurs or takes place IN THE NATURAL WORLD, it is considered "natural". Now, what you are confusing is the concepts of what is natural and what is normal (common place). Now, to understand this idea, you have to look at another word's meaning: Normal. Normal simply means something happens often to where is is common place, and homosexuality doesn't occur on the scale it would need to be considered "normal" or commonplace. Homosexuality isn't commonplace enough to be considered "normal" but since it occurs in the human condition (whether someone chooses to be gay, or simply born that way doesn't matter in this case) it is totally natural.
No, thats just one example.I'm not suggesting gay men are really bi-sexual, where did you get that from?
I'm not mistaking natural with normal at all, you said that homosexuality occurs naturally in the animal kingdom. Then you admit that the only example you might be able to find is of monkeys kept in captivity. Do you think captive animals are a good example of "the natural world"? You appear to be mistaking "natural" with existing.
I disagree that its a choice, but never be afraid to express your opinion!I am torn between whether or not to bring up that homosexuality/bisexuality is entirely a choice...but on second thought I think it might cause a decent bit of hatred to be thrown in my direction. but hey, if anyone wants to debate it with me cleanly I'm game.
I'm interested to hear your theory on why you believe homosexuality is a lifestyle choice.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.