Weiner, Weiner, Weiner...

Users who are viewing this thread

HK

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,410
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.03z
This is just my opinion but I bet that 17 year old girl is hardly an innocent party. Even if there was some mild flirting going on (and all the reports seem to be saying that nothing that even they could dress up as inappropriate was said) she could have started it herself. 17 might make someone a minor in the eyes of the law but that doesn't mean she's sexually innocent and sheltered.

We don't know all the facts by a long way, so tarring the guy as a pervert seems extreme. Okay, he should have shown better judgement because this sort of thing never looks good, but I also don't think he's a sexual deviant for being flattered by a young woman showing him some attention.
 
  • 87
    Replies
  • 3K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Guyzerr

Banned
Messages
12,928
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Don't you people realize his error in judgement isn't really what he did with whoever. It's that he lied about it to the American public when he got caught. That's the real issue here ffs.
 

Natasha

La entrepierna de fuego
Valued Contributor
Messages
38,297
Reaction score
246
Tokenz
2,065.17z
Why does a politician have no business talking to a 17 year old girl if there's nothing indecent about it??? Politicians have been kissing babies for years...is that inappropriate as well??? You can't let his bad acts cloud your judgment...fact is there was NOTHING indecent, that we know of, about his contact w/ this girl. Ugh...this is why I never come to the politics area...I hate politics.
 

Aries

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
615
Tokenz
0.06z
Why does a politician have no business talking to a 17 year old girl if there's nothing indecent about it??? Politicians have been kissing babies for years...is that inappropriate as well??? You can't let his bad acts cloud your judgment...fact is there was NOTHING indecent, that we know of, about his contact w/ this girl. Ugh...this is why I never come to the politics area...I hate politics.

Online, no they don't. I don't care what the conversation is about. Especially knowing the types of things he does online with women, this shows what kind of things he is into. No 46 year old man, Weiner or not, should be talking privately online with a minor. I have a 17 year old daughter. If I knew a man of 46 was chatting with her, I would go and cut off his weiner.
 

griz bear

Member
Messages
5,360
Reaction score
600
Tokenz
0.01z
Why does a politician have no business talking to a 17 year old girl if there's nothing indecent about it??? Politicians have been kissing babies for years...is that inappropriate as well??? You can't let his bad acts cloud your judgment...fact is there was NOTHING indecent, that we know of, about his contact w/ this girl. Ugh...this is why I never come to the politics area...I hate politics.


How do you know there was nothing indecent going on ?
 

Natasha

La entrepierna de fuego
Valued Contributor
Messages
38,297
Reaction score
246
Tokenz
2,065.17z
Online, no they don't. I don't care what the conversation is about. Especially knowing the types of things he does online with women, this shows what kind of things he is into. No 46 year old man, Weiner or not, should be talking privately online with a minor. I have a 17 year old daughter. If I knew a man of 46 was chatting with her, I would go and cut off his weiner.

It was Twitter, was it not??? Twitter is like...well, it's hardly a seemy online chatroom or something.

How do you know there was nothing indecent going on ?

The OP states it...and if the media can't find SOME way to make it indecent, there must be absolutely NOTHING there.
 

HK

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,410
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.03z
The OP states it...and if the media can't find SOME way to make it indecent, there must be absolutely NOTHING there.

:homo:

If there was anything even vaguely out of line they could have taken from it, it would have been all over that article.
 

Aries

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
615
Tokenz
0.06z
I don't believe everything the media may or may not say. People do get paid off, especially in government cover-ups.
 

Natasha

La entrepierna de fuego
Valued Contributor
Messages
38,297
Reaction score
246
Tokenz
2,065.17z
I don't believe everything the media may or may not say. People do get paid off, especially in government cover-ups.
Oh boy. And THAT is another reason I don't do politics.

Time to unsubscribe from this thread, LOL
 

Kyle B

V.I.P User
Messages
4,721
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Online, no they don't. I don't care what the conversation is about. Especially knowing the types of things he does online with women, this shows what kind of things he is into. No 46 year old man, Weiner or not, should be talking privately online with a minor. I have a 17 year old daughter. If I knew a man of 46 was chatting with her, I would go and cut off his weiner.

At the end of the day though, if he did nothing wrong, than he isn't at fault.

Last time I read about this, he was sending nude pics of himself to people. That's wrong in my opinion. I can understand that he has a private life. However, when you become a public figure who represents a district and also represents the American people, you have that extra obligation to behave appropriately. If he didn't do anything wrong in the eyes of the law, than he should not be punished. However, his constituents have every right to judge him as they wish.
 

griz bear

Member
Messages
5,360
Reaction score
600
Tokenz
0.01z
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/11/timeline-rep-weiners-online-sex-scandal/


WASHINGTON – A timeline of events in the online sex scandal involving Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.:
Friday, May 27: Weiner uses his Twitter account to send a waist-down photograph of a man's underpants to a 21-year-old female college student in Seattle. He quickly deletes it and sends out a tweet saying that his Facebook account was hacked.
Saturday, May 28: BigGovernment.com, a website run by conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart, first reports that Weiner sent the lewd photo. Weiner was a Twitter follower of the female college student who received the photo.
Sunday, May 29: A Weiner spokesman tells AP that the lewd photograph of a crotch sent from Weiner's Twitter account was just "a distraction" perpetrated by a hacker.
Tuesday, May 31: Weiner returns to Capitol Hill after the Memorial Day weekend and testily fends off reporters' questions about whether he sent the lewd photo.
"I'm not going to talk about this anymore," Weiner told reporters. "I think that if I was giving a speech to 45,000 people and someone stood up and heckled in the back, I wouldn't spend three days [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]talking[/COLOR][/COLOR] to him. I'm going to get back to the conversation I care about."

Weiner declines to answer reporters' questions about the photo or why he was hiring a lawyer for the case instead of having law enforcement officials pursue the matter.
Wednesday, June 1: Weiner does a round of [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]network[/COLOR][/COLOR] and cable TV interviews, telling MSNBC that he cannot say "with certitude" whether the photo of a man's underpants was of him or not. He jokes a little about it.
"I'm not sure I want to put national, federal resources into trying to figure out who posted a picture on Weiner's website, uh, whatever," he says in explaining why he didn't report the alleged hacking to Capitol Police. I'm not really sure it rises, no pun intended, to that level."
Monday, June 6: The scandal escalates as Breitbart's BigGovernment.com website publishes photos purportedly from a second woman who said she received shirtless shots of the congressman. The site says the pictures were in a cache of intimate online photographs, chats and email exchanges the woman claimed to have. The website does not identify the woman.
Responding, a tearful Weiner makes a profuse public apology at a Manhattan news [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]conference[/COLOR][/COLOR]. He admits sending a photo of his underwear-clad crotch to a young woman over Twitter and then lying repeatedly to protect himself.
"This was me doing a dumb thing, and doing it repeatedly, and lying about it," says Weiner.
Weiner also admits he had engaged in inappropriate contact with six women over the course of three years through social [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]networking[/COLOR][/COLOR] sites like Twitter and Facebook and occasionally over the phone. He says he had never met or had a physical relationship with any of the women and was not even sure of their ages.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi calls for a House ethics investigation into whether he broke the rules. Democratic leaders voice disappointment and embarrassment, reflecting an erosion of support for Weiner.
Weiner insists he did nothing wrong, and begins making calls to Democratic colleagues to apologize. He says he has no plans to resign.
Tuesday, June 7: With most Democrats still keeping an uncomfortable silence, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid steps out and delivers a sharp rebuff to Weiner. It's a clear sign of mounting frustrations fellow Democrats have with a scandal they want to see over as soon as possible.
"I know Congressman Weiner," Reid told reporters. "I wish there was some way I can defend him, but I can't."
Wednesday, June 8: An X-rated photo Weiner purportedly took of himself surfaces on a website. Weiner's office issues a statement that did not deny it had been taken of him.
News breaks that Weiner's wife of less than a year, Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, is pregnant. Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., is the first of several House Democrats to say he should leave office. Pressure for Weiner to resign increases from Democrats.
Friday, June 10: Weiner acknowledges he had exchanged [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]online[/COLOR][/COLOR] messages with a 17-year-old girl in Delaware. He says nothing improper had passed between the two of them. At least 9 House Democrats and two Democratic senators call for Weiner to resign.
Saturday, June 11: Rebuffing calls from top Democratic leaders, including Pelosi, to resign, Weiner announces he plans to take a temporary leave of absence from the House and seek unspecified treatment.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/11/timeline-rep-weiners-online-sex-scandal/#ixzz1P12hVgBR


It seems to me that the Congressman Weiner has been less than fothcoming with the MSM or anyone. Until all of the facts are known, the media is pruely and wildly speculating on what the facts are. Quite often such speculation proves to be wrong. I submit we don't know facts, we only know what the Media tells us. ( they are in the business of news reporting)
 

Guyzerr

Banned
Messages
12,928
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The guy is a public figure and may be privy to very sensitive information. That being the case he is a very ripe candidate for blackmail. It's been done before and it will be done again. Could he have been the one. Absolutely he could have. Now if you combine that with his baldface lies to the American public that puts him in a very bad situation. I could give a shit what he does behind closed doors providing it doesn't involve minors but when someone gets caught red handed and tries to lie his way out of it that's where I get a bit concerned and would not trust him to be part of my leadership staff. He should do the honorable thing and resign but he's much to arrogant for that.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I talk to 17 year olds on line. There are 101 reasons why I talk to them and none of them involve grooming them. Does that mean I'm a wrong 'un?
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Ah, America. Gotta' love the tiniest bit of scandal.

In Italy, Berlusconi would have fucked her and they'd all love him for it. :D
 

griz bear

Member
Messages
5,360
Reaction score
600
Tokenz
0.01z
Prehaps you're a child molester and prehaps there are 101 cops on the way to your house. Without any evidense whatsoever, your argument is completely stupid to say the least.

except I can see internet tracking traces when ever you post, it's in the data stream. OH well never mind. sorry I woke you up.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top