Wal-Mart is in fact rabidly anti-union, deploying teams of union-busters
from Bentonville to any spot where there's a whisper of organizing activity.
"While unions might be appropriate for other companies, they have no place
at Wal-Mart," a spokeswoman told a Texas Observer reporter who was covering
an NLRB hearing on the company's manhandling of 11 meat-cutters who worked
at a Wal-Mart Supercenter in Jacksonville, Texas.
These derring-do employees were sick of working harder and longer for the
same low pay. "We signed [union] cards, and all hell broke loose," says
Sidney Smith, one of the Jacksonville meat-cutters who established the
first-ever Wal-Mart union in the U.S., voting in February 2000 to join the
United Food and Commercial Workers. Eleven days later, Wal-Mart announced
that it was closing the meat-cutting departments in all of its stores and
would henceforth buy prepackaged meat elsewhere.
But the repressive company didn't stop there. As the Observer reports:
"Smith was fired for theft, after a manager agreed to let him buy a box of
overripe bananas for 50 cents, Smith ate one banana before paying for the
box, and was judged to have stolen that banana."
only as much as the employee, it's the law..as for keeping the 3.6% is bullshit.......walmart only cares for being the biggest company not about it's customers like a family operation wouldNacil Buperetov said:I'm so sick of this anti-corporate bullshite.
Wal-Mart keeps a lousy 3.6% for itself in profits, while employee costs are over 25%.
Any attempt at unionization or higher wages would bankrupt the company in a matter of days.
Hell, no one is forced to buy from Walmart, and no one is forced to work for them.
It's not like those "mom and pop" stores they "drove out" gave better wages, and they sure as hell didn't give them better healthcare.
Walmart is no more ruthless than any other business, corporate or otherwise.
And the worst bitching of all is the notion that their low wages are a drain to taxpayers who have to cover the price of their welfare and medicaid. Any idea what walmart pay into social security, welfare, and medicare/medicaid? A hell of alot.
If the American people want Walmart out, they can stop shopping there tomarrow.
Nacil Buperetov said:Nope, 3.6% - the average for a retail store is 3.7%.
And small businesses care about making money, just like anyone else.
I don't really care weather a company cares about anyone or anything. As long as they obey the laws and don't manipulate the gov't, fine by me.
And the point I'm making about the payouts to medicare and the such is, they produce more than the employees take.
Walmart workers, on average, make $8.23 an hour. That's alot more than your typical hometown proud store will pay.
The only way walmart could pay more is if they charged more, and the low prices are what keeps people buying "Larry the Cable Guy" merchandise.
If you work at Walmart, you probabaly don't have any better options in life.
The way I see it, Walmart gives low end workers an option they didn't have before.
A Walmart employee can afford Walmart merchandise - I think that's a fair deal.
Sim said:What you are failing to realize is that the profits are often turned right around into more purchases of items, furthering their cause, while earning just a little bit more for the company. So yes, the small percentage is quite possible.
With all that crap out of the way...
Austin has a motto: Keep Austin Weird
This is something we all pitch in to do by shopping at the smaller shops and local businesses, and not allowing big bad brother corporation to have all of what we love. It isn't the big businesses that are ruining small towns...it's the people in them who are not doing their part to keep the small businesses alive.
Wal-Mart is seen as a convenience, and if people would merely take a little more time out to go to several different places to obtain everything on their lists, it wouldn't be as large and powerful as it seems to be now. A company is only as successful as its patrons, and should they choose to shop at one store, rather than four, then it is their faults, and not that of the bigger business.
Americans are all about rushing around to do this and that, and quite often we forget to stop and smell the roses, and once the roses are gone, we bitch about it, rather than taking the time to plant more...
Sim said:What you are failing to realize is that the profits are often turned right around into more purchases of items, furthering their cause, while earning just a little bit more for the company. So yes, the small percentage is quite possible.
With all that crap out of the way...
Austin has a motto: Keep Austin Weird
This is something we all pitch in to do by shopping at the smaller shops and local businesses, and not allowing big bad brother corporation to have all of what we love. It isn't the big businesses that are ruining small towns...it's the people in them who are not doing their part to keep the small businesses alive.
Wal-Mart is seen as a convenience, and if people would merely take a little more time out to go to several different places to obtain everything on their lists, it wouldn't be as large and powerful as it seems to be now. A company is only as successful as its patrons, and should they choose to shop at one store, rather than four, then it is their faults, and not that of the bigger business.
Americans are all about rushing around to do this and that, and quite often we forget to stop and smell the roses, and once the roses are gone, we bitch about it, rather than taking the time to plant more...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.