I am not sure I understand this. Every article made has a biased to it but it is the trend that establishes biased of the organization that publishes it.Have you got any articles by the BBC which show bias?
I am not sure I understand this. Every article made has a biased to it but it is the trend that establishes biased of the organization that publishes it.Have you got any articles by the BBC which show bias?
That article is just talking about individuals working at the BBC and of course there are going to be people there with opinions. Have you got any articles by the BBC which show bias?
thank you so much. i completely agree with you.
this kind of crap sickens me. wrong wrong wrong...:thumbdown:coolLook at the difference in these two cover stories by the same magazine:
that is one helluva comeback, lingy dingy!!!! :24: :clap :thumbupHence the intense hatred of FOX news. lol
With thousands of different reporters, there are bound to be some heavy biases. That's why as gling said you need to consult different sources and ESPECIALLY when its on technical issues like the law.
I am not sure I understand this. Every article made has a biased to it but it is the trend that establishes biased of the organization that publishes it.
You didn't read what I said. lolSo show me a biased BBC article then.
So show me a biased BBC article then.
By Lynn Davidson (Bio | Archive)
April 11, 2007 - 21:08 ET
The UK’s Telegraph reported that the BBC cancelled a 90-minute drama about the youngest surviving winner of the UK’s highest award for valor because “it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to the war in Iraq.” The BBC blocked the project that would have honored the incredible bravery and resilience of Private Johnson Beharry, a man who didn’t hesitate to risk his own life two separate times for his fellow soldiers. His Victoria Cross citation reads like a blockbuster Hollywood action script, but instead, it’s the real deal. Sounds uplifting and encouraging, and it could even be a real morale booster, right? Well, for the Beeb, that’s the problem (emphasis mine throughout):
For the BBC, however, his story is "too positive" about the conflict.
The corporation has cancelled the commission for a 90-minute drama about Britain's youngest surviving Victoria Cross hero because it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to the war in Iraq.
A great deal of the current criticism of the British Broadcasting Corporation is based on the BBC's appalling, biased coverage of the war in Iraq. As the war began and the Coalition invasion proceeded across the desert toward Baghdad, I sat watching French TV and listening to the BBC's World Service. That's as close to a state of suspended disbelief as a man can get. As the capital finally fell to the Americans, I made a few notes. Here they are.
There is no need. The BBC has admitted to being biased.I think you mis understood what I said, show me an actual BBC article which is biased, not something wrote about them by the competition.
There is no need. The BBC has admitted to being biased.
What would be the point? If them ADMITTING to being biased isn't proof enough for you then me posting a million of their articles would certainly not be proof enough for you either because you will believe what you want to believe despite the facts.Well there is seeing how easily available there articles are. An article directly from the BBC which is biased will completely prove your point so why cant you show me one?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.