Because more than half the country disagree with your word failure...So now the question is why keep a failed figure in charge rather than changing him out. Why wouldn't the dems toss out Obama in favor of Hillary?
Because more than half the country disagree with your word failure...So now the question is why keep a failed figure in charge rather than changing him out. Why wouldn't the dems toss out Obama in favor of Hillary?
I agree
One can rile about republican obstructionism. and rightly so.. But Bill Clinton had the same crap and he got some things done.
Obama has no clue and no experience and is IMO clueless and reckless and incompetent.
One of the few things Obama did which most agreed with was to take down OBL. If his people used that to leak out info for a movie as is being alleged than that speaks a lot. And I did say IF
I fully agree with you Tim....we must be both belong of those more than 50% and still growing towards a solid mayority by the end of this year.Just because this has been repeated over and over doesn't make it true.
He has actually accomplished quite a bit of his agenda in his first term
Just because this has been repeated over and over doesn't make it true.
True, so why all the whinging??Just because this has been repeated over and over doesn't make it true.
He has actually accomplished quite a bit of his agenda in his first term
So now the question is why keep a failed figure in charge rather than changing him out. Why wouldn't the dems toss out Obama in favor of Hillary?
LMFAO....I rather be name called butthole than that.......:24:No shit. And they wonder why I call them conservobots.
I'm sure it is, since most people place the party ahead of the country.That would be pretty divisive and would probably cause more harm for the Democrats than good.
Besides, isn't it basically assumed that the President will be re-nominated? Have their been instances in US history where the incumbent hasn't won their party's nomination? If so, I bet it's a very rare occurrence.
True, so why all the whinging??
Also, you're not alleging that he is a more successful president than President Clinton, are you?
I'm not talking about agreeing. I didn't agree with many things Clinton did, don't agree with the vast majority of power-grabs Obama has done, and probably wouldn't agree with most of Secretary Clinton's decisions if she were president. I'm only going on effectiveness.I couldn't give you an honest opinion on that. I would need to compare the first three years of each of their terms. As of right now, it would only be a guess.
And you need to remember that some of Clintons biggest accomplishments are things I do not agree with... like NAFTA
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.