Wow, great pic. :clap Astonishing what pics talented people can take.![]()
now that deserves rep,you credit the photographer and not the camera:thumbup
:eek You mean it wasn't the camera I just spent a fortune on. I'm gunna take it back.now that deserves rep,you credit the photographer and not the camera:thumbup
:eek You mean it wasn't the camera I just spent a fortune on. I'm gunna take it back.![]()
Probably the Canon 1DS Mark III but I would have to buy a few lens to go with it.If money was no object - what camera would you get?
If money was no object - what camera would you get?
I'm sure someone would but that someone won't be me. I wonder if you can buy add-on lens or if you'd be stuck with the kit lens. :24:If I can answer also..
Mine would be this one..
http://www.steves-digicams.com/know...-expensive-digital-cameras-in-production.html
But I am sure someone on here will find fault with this $42,000.00 camera... :24::24:
Thanks PDW0W !!!! :clap :clap
I can't stop but stare at that pic. Truly love eeeetttt!!!!:thumbup
I agree with the white background, that wing span/ feathers look awesome. That shadowing/tranparency at the tip of it's feathers give it an amazing appeal :thumbup
I'm better at terrible shots than you are. :coolI'm sure someone would but that someone won't be me. I wonder if you can buy add-on lens or if you'd be stuck with the kit lens. :24:
I like this line from the Canon review. " Regardless of how good the camera is, it is still possible to take a terrible shot. " :thumbup I prove that all the time.![]()
I'm sure someone would but that someone won't be me. I wonder if you can buy add-on lens or if you'd be stuck with the kit lens. :24:
I like this line from the Canon review. " Regardless of how good the camera is, it is still possible to take a terrible shot. " :thumbup I prove that all the time.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.