Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
I'm not illiterate, I just don't give a fuck about this bull shit.:gives:
The rise of fascism in US
- Thread starter NWO
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
-
38Replies
-
1KViews
-
0Participant count
-
Participants list
Dodge_Sniper
Active Member
:asshole:
I can read just fine, or I would be on this board.
I can read just fine, or I would be on this board.
Ugh... I come back from a week-long trip to this?
This guy is really getting on my nerves. Maybe if we just agree with him he'll go away. The government is being taken over by nazis and fascism is rising in the US. Happy now, NWO?
This guy is really getting on my nerves. Maybe if we just agree with him he'll go away. The government is being taken over by nazis and fascism is rising in the US. Happy now, NWO?
EmperorKupcake
Member
Well, guys. He may not be the nicest person, but we should give him the benefit of the doubt and take his post into serious consideration. I mean, he evidently did his homework: I think almost all of his facts were correct. This analysis is controversial, but that doesn't mean its necessarily incorrect.
It's a good thought.. But you were not here for his last thread... Which is why he is getting the responses he is getting. We have already been through all this once, Its the same story, diffrent words.
IntruderLS1
Active Member
Okay... here we go. 
While the article you posted was written at or above a 7th grade level, there are several glaring problems with how the writer chooses to extrapolate his information for you. It's an elaborate bait and switch.
The writer mentions Mein Kampf as a piece of viable literature from an author who was in the process of taking over Europe. I used to believe this too, until I actually read it. Mein Kampf is a collection of ramblings that are being regurgitated by a prisoner with a bad childhood who has bought into an anti-Semitic view of several pamphlets he started getting into. A 5 year old can blame somebody else for their problems. Hitler’s book can in no way be accurately labeled a scientific propaganda device.
Hitler and Stalin did posses the military capability to damage and/or destroy their neighbors. Good point. Now how exactly does this translate into them being real fascists, and the Bin Laden's in the world being posers? If you study Islamic military action in the past several centuries, you'll very quickly see a pattern of the sword being used on neighbors to great effect. You don't need nuclear bombs to topple nations. You simply need to choose enemies that will not fight back with the same zeal you're willing to use.
America was able to recover amazingly quickly after the attacks on 9.11. (Even though you'll be the first person to look me in the eye and tell me President Bush and Co. are morons of all things economy). World travel is up, and legal immigration is up, which means that people don't hate American's as much as you would preach.
Terrorists living in caves in Afghanistan cannot fell a stable government as long as the people they're attacking refuse to die. They're having a hell of a time dropping the unstable governments of Iraq and Afghanistan. But they can kill a lot of people, and cost a lot of money. Do you suggest we simply leave them alone, and let them kill us? Of course not, but what are our other options? I swear to you that a live and let live policy does not work. It's been done. A lot. Do some real homework, and don't just subscribe to what this guy is telling you. History books make for far more accurate learning than political junkies with agendas.
Iraq has problems now, but they're doing statistically better than America did. Better than Germany did. The only problem with Iraq is the amount of press that the bad guys get every time they get something right. It takes 7-10 years to quell a rebellion. Get over it. We are there at the request of the Iraqi government, and have stated publicly we will leave if they ask us to. We're helping an important ally get on their feet, and that's not only noble, but it benefits us 1000 fold the cost.
We're still losing troops. It is sad, but life is hard, and war costs lives. From a military stand point, we've lost almost nothing in these past few years. Certainly nothing close to what it would take to defeat the U.S. military. I know you believe otherwise, but go to a history book and count losses in the great battles of history. (Not just American history) Go back to the Greeks, the Persians, Mongols, and Romans. Find me a war that cost less than 3000 troops. Hell, look into the island wars.....
I cannot believe you would copy/paste an article, and then have the nerve to insult our intelligence. I recommend you do some world travel and see how things work outside of our paradise.
While the article you posted was written at or above a 7th grade level, there are several glaring problems with how the writer chooses to extrapolate his information for you. It's an elaborate bait and switch.
The writer mentions Mein Kampf as a piece of viable literature from an author who was in the process of taking over Europe. I used to believe this too, until I actually read it. Mein Kampf is a collection of ramblings that are being regurgitated by a prisoner with a bad childhood who has bought into an anti-Semitic view of several pamphlets he started getting into. A 5 year old can blame somebody else for their problems. Hitler’s book can in no way be accurately labeled a scientific propaganda device.
Hitler and Stalin did posses the military capability to damage and/or destroy their neighbors. Good point. Now how exactly does this translate into them being real fascists, and the Bin Laden's in the world being posers? If you study Islamic military action in the past several centuries, you'll very quickly see a pattern of the sword being used on neighbors to great effect. You don't need nuclear bombs to topple nations. You simply need to choose enemies that will not fight back with the same zeal you're willing to use.
America was able to recover amazingly quickly after the attacks on 9.11. (Even though you'll be the first person to look me in the eye and tell me President Bush and Co. are morons of all things economy). World travel is up, and legal immigration is up, which means that people don't hate American's as much as you would preach.
Terrorists living in caves in Afghanistan cannot fell a stable government as long as the people they're attacking refuse to die. They're having a hell of a time dropping the unstable governments of Iraq and Afghanistan. But they can kill a lot of people, and cost a lot of money. Do you suggest we simply leave them alone, and let them kill us? Of course not, but what are our other options? I swear to you that a live and let live policy does not work. It's been done. A lot. Do some real homework, and don't just subscribe to what this guy is telling you. History books make for far more accurate learning than political junkies with agendas.
Iraq has problems now, but they're doing statistically better than America did. Better than Germany did. The only problem with Iraq is the amount of press that the bad guys get every time they get something right. It takes 7-10 years to quell a rebellion. Get over it. We are there at the request of the Iraqi government, and have stated publicly we will leave if they ask us to. We're helping an important ally get on their feet, and that's not only noble, but it benefits us 1000 fold the cost.
We're still losing troops. It is sad, but life is hard, and war costs lives. From a military stand point, we've lost almost nothing in these past few years. Certainly nothing close to what it would take to defeat the U.S. military. I know you believe otherwise, but go to a history book and count losses in the great battles of history. (Not just American history) Go back to the Greeks, the Persians, Mongols, and Romans. Find me a war that cost less than 3000 troops. Hell, look into the island wars.....
I cannot believe you would copy/paste an article, and then have the nerve to insult our intelligence. I recommend you do some world travel and see how things work outside of our paradise.
UncleBacon
OTz original V.I.P
Dodge_Sniper
Active Member
EmperorKupcake
Member
Okay... here we go.
While the article you posted was written at or above a 7th grade level, there are several glaring problems with how the writer chooses to extrapolate his information for you. It's an elaborate bait and switch...
...I cannot believe you would copy/paste an article, and then have the nerve to insult our intelligence. I recommend you do some world travel and see how things work outside of our paradise.
NWO, I suggest you quite life after getting pwned so severely. GJ
God, when are you going to get the point that NO ONE on these forums gives half a shit about your god damn government conspiracy theories.
All you do is fucking rant about how the government is going to kill everyone and its a tyranical, fascist piece of crap. I don't know about everyone else (j/k I actually do) but when you post a new thread all i can do is say: "Oh God, what is this nutjob crying about now?"
Here are a few options I have thought up for you:
1. Stop posting. No one cares.
2. Post something interesting for once.
3. Allow me to buy your computer, since it would keep you from posting.
4. Stop posting.
5. Stop telling everyone "Read it, you illiterate people [insert meaningless emotiocon here]" We can read, otherwise we wouldn't be able to use a computer you dolt.
6. MOVE SOMEWHERE THAT DOESN'T HAVE A 'FASCIST' GOVERNMENT. Then you can finally shut the hell up.
7. Keep posting more crack-pot shit, and keep hearing from me about how you are the bain of my internet existance.
Oh, and for the last time, :gives:
Under-Ground
New Member
that dam post was way to long :S
Ok people Im going to say thats enough. If you have nothing more nice to say lets not say it at all, he's entitled to his opinions no matter how offbase we all may think they are if this is going to continue be a ripfest Im going to lock this thread.
Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
Okay... here we go.
While the article you posted was written at or above a 7th grade level, there are several glaring problems with how the writer chooses to extrapolate his information for you. It's an elaborate bait and switch.
The writer mentions Mein Kampf as a piece of viable literature from an author who was in the process of taking over Europe. I used to believe this too, until I actually read it. Mein Kampf is a collection of ramblings that are being regurgitated by a prisoner with a bad childhood who has bought into an anti-Semitic view of several pamphlets he started getting into. A 5 year old can blame somebody else for their problems. Hitler’s book can in no way be accurately labeled a scientific propaganda device.
Hitler and Stalin did posses the military capability to damage and/or destroy their neighbors. Good point. Now how exactly does this translate into them being real fascists, and the Bin Laden's in the world being posers? If you study Islamic military action in the past several centuries, you'll very quickly see a pattern of the sword being used on neighbors to great effect. You don't need nuclear bombs to topple nations. You simply need to choose enemies that will not fight back with the same zeal you're willing to use.
America was able to recover amazingly quickly after the attacks on 9.11. (Even though you'll be the first person to look me in the eye and tell me President Bush and Co. are morons of all things economy). World travel is up, and legal immigration is up, which means that people don't hate American's as much as you would preach.
Terrorists living in caves in Afghanistan cannot fell a stable government as long as the people they're attacking refuse to die. They're having a hell of a time dropping the unstable governments of Iraq and Afghanistan. But they can kill a lot of people, and cost a lot of money. Do you suggest we simply leave them alone, and let them kill us? Of course not, but what are our other options? I swear to you that a live and let live policy does not work. It's been done. A lot. Do some real homework, and don't just subscribe to what this guy is telling you. History books make for far more accurate learning than political junkies with agendas.
Iraq has problems now, but they're doing statistically better than America did. Better than Germany did. The only problem with Iraq is the amount of press that the bad guys get every time they get something right. It takes 7-10 years to quell a rebellion. Get over it. We are there at the request of the Iraqi government, and have stated publicly we will leave if they ask us to. We're helping an important ally get on their feet, and that's not only noble, but it benefits us 1000 fold the cost.
We're still losing troops. It is sad, but life is hard, and war costs lives. From a military stand point, we've lost almost nothing in these past few years. Certainly nothing close to what it would take to defeat the U.S. military. I know you believe otherwise, but go to a history book and count losses in the great battles of history. (Not just American history) Go back to the Greeks, the Persians, Mongols, and Romans. Find me a war that cost less than 3000 troops. Hell, look into the island wars.....
I cannot believe you would copy/paste an article, and then have the nerve to insult our intelligence. I recommend you do some world travel and see how things work outside of our paradise.
Well said!
IntruderLS1
Active Member
Ha-ha. Thanks.
You should have seen me in the old days against Saleen and company. LOL Good times there. I miss that little commie!
Speaking of, anybody know where Mac went?
You should have seen me in the old days against Saleen and company. LOL Good times there. I miss that little commie!
Speaking of, anybody know where Mac went?
Ha-ha. Thanks.
You should have seen me in the old days against Saleen and company. LOL Good times there. I miss that little commie!
Speaking of, anybody know where Mac went?
I think he went on tour with eminem?
IntruderLS1
Active Member
LOL That ghetto white boy picture with him and his friends finally got him somewhere? :lol:
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members