JoanMcWench
New Member
I was perusing a few articles and stumbled upon this one:
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...unveils-invisible-art-exhibition-7767057.html
For those that feel the need to not read it here is the gist:
So, I felt I should ask: Can nothing be art? It seems they are trying quite hard to make it so. Is a blank canvas art if someone explains what went into the blank canvas? If the person who constructs the canvas explains the toil and strife in creating it does that then make the canvas itself art?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...unveils-invisible-art-exhibition-7767057.html
For those that feel the need to not read it here is the gist:
London's Hayward Gallery will gather together 50 "invisible" works by famous artists including Andy Warhol, Yves Klein and Yoko Ono for an upcoming exhibition, thought to be the first of its kind in Britain.
So, I felt I should ask: Can nothing be art? It seems they are trying quite hard to make it so. Is a blank canvas art if someone explains what went into the blank canvas? If the person who constructs the canvas explains the toil and strife in creating it does that then make the canvas itself art?