Should Voting Be Compulsory?

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I'm starting this thread because it is in Australia and they have the biggest dickheads to choose between. I think it's stupid. If I was an Australian I would vote for their equivalent of the Monster Raving Looney party or spoil my ballot paper, it's pathetic that they fine people for not voting!
 
  • 22
    Replies
  • 575
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm starting this thread because it is in Australia and they have the biggest dickheads to choose between. I think it's stupid. If I was an Australian I would vote for their equivalent of the Monster Raving Looney party or spoil my ballot paper, it's pathetic that they fine people for not voting!

I think it should be if your on the electoral roll, but I dont think it should be compulsory to be on the electoral roll. (if that makes sense)

Anyway, theres always the "legalise it" party when all else fails:ninja

But I will have to check who will be getting their votes.....Big Red..or The Budgie Smuggler.:willy_nilly:
 

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh..and I genuinelly forgot to one year...it truly slipped my mind.

I wrote a letter telling them that (I was totally honest) and they didnt fine me.

So, usually (in fact I'm sure ALL the time) if you write a letter, they won't fine you.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Oh..and I genuinelly forgot to one year...it truly slipped my mind.

I wrote a letter telling them that (I was totally honest) and they didnt fine me.

So, usually (in fact I'm sure ALL the time) if you write a letter, they won't fine you.

Dear Welsh bint,

I forgot to vote this year, mainly because all the candidates have as much to offer my country as the Wiggles on crack, I'm sure you understand.

Yours sincerely....

Do you think that would work?
 

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Dear Welsh bint,

I forgot to vote this year, mainly because all the candidates have as much to offer my country as the Wiggles on crack, I'm sure you understand.

Yours sincerely....

Do you think that would work?


LMAO....it might be worth the 100 buck fine to find out:24::24::ninja
 

Francis

Sarcasm is me :)
Messages
8,367
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
2.08z
I have long said there should be the following options, especially if they will force us to vote. it has been bandied about in Canada as well and one has to wonder if our shitheads as candidates even have a clue how little options we actually have and how many of us know how true that is..

1) Liberal Party
2) Conservative Party
3) Green Party
4) None of the Fucken Assholes running, start over.. :D
 

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Remember the movie "Brewsters Millions" with Richard Pryor?

I ALWAYS wanted to write "none of the above" on my ballot paper
 
Messages
417
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Well, at the least in India, there is a law which states that the voting choice card must have a choice ' I don't want to vote for any of the above'. Yes, that's true. But, in reality, the option is never really provided.

In such a case, if one doesn't deem any of the candidates worthy, he must not be made to vote. If they do provide the last, aforesaid option, then yes, it could be made compulsory so as to evaluate the real public response towards 'politicians'.

Regards,
Richard.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
no definitely not! I really don't think voting should be compulsory. If you don't want to vote, then don't. All of the people who aren't voting should be taken as a message that the system we have sucks.
 

Springsteen

Number 2, Rafael!
Messages
13,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.06z
It shouldn't be compulsory no, as you might not like anyone who's running. So why bother?

But what I don't also get is the argument "If you don't vote don 't moan about how crap it is"

Well yeah you can, you always can, know why? Because the likelyhood is you are paying for it. You are paying for something stupid going on in London which only a small number of people are going on about. You might be driving through, say, London, and your car hits a huge pothole in the road and you complain to London council about the terrible state of the road, they aren't going to turn round and say "Hey you didn't vote in the General Election to elect somebody who gives a shit about the roads, so piss off" - Wouldn't happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Meirionnydd

Active Member
Messages
793
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm starting this thread because it is in Australia and they have the biggest dickheads to choose between. I think it's stupid. If I was an Australian I would vote for their equivalent of the Monster Raving Looney party or spoil my ballot paper, it's pathetic that they fine people for not voting!

You get fined about $20 for not voting, providing you're actually on the electoral roll in the first place. Also, you're not actually forced to 'vote', I cannot stress that enough. All you do is go down to the polling station on election day, talk to the nice people from the AEC and get your name marked off the electoral roll, enter the ballot booth, make a selection on the ballot paper, and drop it in the appropriate box. You're not legally required to make any selection on the ballot paper, at all.

Also, we have preferential voting here, quite different from the first-past-the-post system in the UK, so there isn't exactly a simple choice of A or B. In any case, Juila Gillard is quite a professional, well-versed and capable public servant, as is the majority of the federal parliamentary Labor Party. But, Tony Abbot, on the other hand, yes, he is a dickhead.

Compulsory voting ensues that everyone gets a say in who should run the country. In some countries where voting is not compulsory, voter turnout is absurdly low. Rather than having the desired effect of sending a message to leaders that the populace is clearly disillusioned with their policies and a change is needed; the complete opposite occurs, politicians can single out groups of people who are unlikely and likely to vote, and promote policies that benefit the latter.

And in that case, elections aren't exactly 'democratic' in a sense, politicians aren't given a mandate from the majority of the entire population, but rather just the majority of people who voted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
But what I don't also get is the argument "If you don't vote don 't moan about how crap it is"

:homo:

I never understood this either, anyone who lives in the United Kingdom is affected by who is in power. So regardless of who; or whether, they voted, they have the right to an opinion.

By this logic, the only people who have a right to moan are those who voted for the opposition.... :willy_nilly:
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
You get fined about $20 for not voting, providing you're actually on the electoral roll in the first place. Also, you're not actually forced to 'vote', I cannot stress that enough. All you do is go down to the polling station on election day, talk to the nice people from the AEC and get your name marked off the electoral roll, enter the ballot booth, make a selection on the ballot paper, and drop it in the appropriate box. You're not legally required to make any selection on the ballot paper, at all.

Also, we have preferential voting here, quite different from the first-past-the-post system in the UK, so there isn't exactly a simple choice of A or B. In any case, Juila Gillard is quite a professional, well-versed and capable public servant, as is the majority of the federal parliamentary Labor Party. But, Tony Abbot, on the other hand, yes, he is a dickhead.

Compulsory voting ensues that everyone gets a say in who should run the country. In some countries where voting is not compulsory, voter turnout is absurdly low. Rather than having the desired effect of sending a message to leaders that the populace is clearly disillusioned with their policies and a change is needed; the complete opposite occurs, politicians can single out groups of people who are unlikely and likely to vote, and promote policies that benefit the latter.

And in that case, elections aren't exactly 'democratic' in a sense, politicians aren't given a mandate from the majority of the entire population, but rather just the majority of people who voted.

Yes, I've heard your system is different, where you vote in order of preference or something, that does sound fairer to me, compulsory voting dosen't though, I really dont see why a government should be chosen by taking away peoples freedom and forcing people who dont know or care to choose it. Oh, and Julia Gillard seems a back stabbing cunt to me.
 
Messages
417
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This thread seems to remind me of Yes, Minister and Yes, Prime Minister. Paul Eddington at his best to portray the truth in politics.

Regards,
Richard.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I'm starting this thread because it is in Australia and they have the biggest dickheads to choose between. I think it's stupid. If I was an Australian I would vote for their equivalent of the Monster Raving Looney party or spoil my ballot paper, it's pathetic that they fine people for not voting!

I don't see what this has to do with compulsory voting- does Australia have it? Your describing a situation where you might not want compulsory voting aren't you?
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top