Dunno why you would think that. The Republocrats aren't.You really make my head hurt... if the Nazi party were to control the USA, they would still be bound by the rule of law in the nation.
here is something more disturbing....http://pibillwarner.wordpress.com/2...rently-on-trial-for-hate-speech-in-amsterdam/ and were The Netherlands is heading to.
That is because Communist societies do suffer a ton and they've never done good at all. So.I like Socialism is a good idea, even in reality. Americans love to show how much Communist societies suffer, but fail to show anything they do good at all. Democratic societies have alot of shortcomings but noone criticizes that now do they?
You really make my head hurt... if the Nazi party were to control the USA, they would still be bound by the rule of law in the nation. They could offer amendments to the Constitution, but they would be required to operate within the current bounds of it. Granted, that doesn't seem to have stopped the Democrats, but that's another story all together.
it is more disturbing that you think he is a "neo-nazi".
I'm not sure you even know what Geert believes
That is because Communist societies do suffer a ton and they've never done good at all. So.
I mean, they're pretty good at mass starvation and genocide, though.
You really make my head hurt... if the Nazi party were to control the USA, they would still be bound by the rule of law in the nation. They could offer amendments to the Constitution, but they would be required to operate within the current bounds of it. Granted, that doesn't seem to have stopped the Democrats, but that's another story all together.
Has anyone ever been "bound" by the constitution? It's either ignored or amended as people in power see fit. So if a fascist regime took power, the constitution would hardly matter, since they answer only to themselves.
there is really a difference from a strict communist leader and a fascist maniac who commits genocide. but to black and white visioned americans they're all anti-american bastards, anyhow so let's classify them all the same to make ourselves look so compassionate and caring.
The BNP are legal, there was a lot of opposition when they were asked to be part of Question Week before an election, after all they were riding on a crest of a wave of popularity due to voters not turning up.
That swiftly put paid to the BNP's "popularity" where they were voted out of their seats in the by-elections. Freedom of speech put paid to haters.
The BNP are hardly Nazis
in fact they aren't at all
For some odd reason you chose to single out the Democrats, hmm. Why are the Republican's beyond your ire?
So what does today's Nazi Party stand for? If it is criminal acts, then I'd say no, they don't have a right to exist, however I realize I've just entered the slippery slope region...
IraqI singled the Democrats out because they've been far more guilty of it than the GOP, so those were the instances that stuck in my mind.
I'm certain that you and others will use it as a reason to call me a Republican some more though.
Iraq
Patriot Act
Habeas Corpus
NCLB
There's plenty of shit on both sides of the aisles.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.