Ratifying the 4th pending amendment

Users who are viewing this thread

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Something I learned about in history class today, is the unratified proposed amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The 4th of which, is the Child Labor Amendment. This amendment states:

Section 1. The Congress shall have power to limit, regulate, and prohibit the labor of persons under eighteen years of age.

Section 2. The power of the several States is unimpaired by this article except that the operation of State laws shall be suspended to the extent necessary to give effect to legislation enacted by the Congress.

This amendment is still technically pending, it has been since June 2, 1924. But something interesting is that an amendment must be ratified by 38 of the 50 states to become incorporated into the Federal Constitution, and only 28 have voted to ratify this amendment, meaning if 10 more vote to ratify it, it actually will happen.

So, with teenagers giving birth to children more and more each year, what do you think? Should Congress have power to limit childbirth if the mother is a minor, or should it stay the way it is?

I think it's a bit of both. While it would help to prevent unprepared teenagers from having children that could be raised poorly, it should also be in the hands of the mother if she wants to raise a child or not.
 
  • 40
    Replies
  • 817
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
What the hell does that have to do with teenagers giving birth?:confused

Uhm...everything?

It's saying that with this amendment being accepted, the Congress will have power over any person under the age of 18 giving birth. I'm not sure what they would do, but they'd have control over it.

Which is where my question comes into play. Should this amendment be ratified? It seems that more and more teenagers under 18 are becoming pregnant. I've seen many 15 and 16 year old girls that are pregnant. Should this amendment be ratified, to help prevent unprepared girls from having a child?
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Erm..I had a look at this and can't find anything in it about teenagers giving birth, it's about regulating the amount of work that children can do. :confused
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Section 1. The Congress shall have power to limit, regulate, and prohibit the labor of persons under eighteen years of age.

Section 2. The power of the several States is unimpaired by this article except that the operation of State laws shall be suspended to the extent necessary to give effect to legislation enacted by the Congress.

Child Labor, as in, nobody under 18 shall labor(Give birth to) a child. Child Labor Amendment.

You're probably think of child labor laws. Read the sections I posted, they explain it.

EDIT: Wait a second, maybe I'm misinterpretting this?
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Yeah... it's talking about child labor, as in working... not giving birth :D

silly boy
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Me too, this is the funniest thing I've heard for quite some time, this thread is a classic! I think Tim or someone should sticky it!:24::24::24:
 

Ria

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,054
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I cannot believe the useless school that he learnt that in (as in was taught that) that child labour meant giving birth :confused ;)
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
What the hell?

It wasn't the school that taught him it's about birthing children, that was just his assumption to the meaning of the amendment...

Exactly. It said "Child labor". I figured, well, we've already got child labor laws, so why would an amendment for it be pending? My misunderstanding, it's not a "useless school".
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
What the hell?

It wasn't the school that taught him it's about birthing children, that was just his assumption to the meaning of the amendment...

I disagree, Dodge is super intelligent and we shouldn't put this down to his age either, that would just be patronising as he likes to point out!:D;)
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top