\
If Bush is not responsible for the current turmoil then who is?
You can go back to Clinton Administration and Congress from that point forward and that would be both sides of the isle.
\
If Bush is not responsible for the current turmoil then who is?
Please don't be irrational about this.
Have a hard time following a conversation? The honeymoon doesn't start until he is sworn in so that would be after he is president.
Bush been sitting on the problems since the player Clinton administration and you expect Obama do a David Copperfield?You can go back to Clinton Administration and Congress from that point forward and that would be both sides of the isle.
As long as your not stupid about it.
Pretty much a moot point.
No substance here. The man is not even President yet you act like he should be making decisions to change our course.
This happens with every new President incumbent, approval ratings are somewhat high prior to entering office.
Nothing different in Obama's case. But on the other hand, it seems that you're mocking him that he has a high approval rating. There's nothing to mock here. It is likely that they will fluctuate over the course of his tenure anyway.
You do know that your refers to possession right?
Grow up, my friend.
Bush been sitting on the problems since the player Clinton administration and you expect Obama do a David Copperfield?
Again, follow the conversation. The point was made that Bush has a low approval rating. Okay, so what. Then someone said that Obama's approval rating is high. I made the point that you can't compare the two because Obama hasn't made any decisions yet as HE ISN"T the president. I went further and said lets check the ratings after the honeymoon is over and see where he stands. At the risk of repeating myself.....the honeymoon doesn't start until he is sworn in as president.
I can type slower if that will help.
My predicion is that he will do well to address the current issues with the collective responsibilityHe's the president is he not? Isn't it his job to address these problems? Once we see what he does to address them we then can determine if he is effective or not which, I suspect, will be reflected in his approval rating. See how this all ties together?
Thanks for the grammar lesson....who gives a shit. I will as soon as you do....or am I being irrational again and you stupid?
My predicion is that he will do well to address the current issues with the collective responsibility
It just shows the flaws of your unwarranted comments. :24: Me, stupid? You cannot seem to get your grammar together correctly.
I'm just glad I got the opportunity to enlighten you regarding the basic principles of grammar flawlessness. Thank you.
Yes if you have nothing intelligent to add you can always address grammar. I suspect you will be addressing a lot of grammar.
Not really. But a great assumption.
Assumptions tend to be invalid most of the time. Why..... You already know this??
Grow up and learn a little, my friend. Your comments are not sticking to me as you had hoped, just thought I'd let you know. :nod:
I am right. You are wrong.What's your source?
No he didn't. That's inaccurate.
He had little over a 50%-60% approval rating following his reelection (early 2005).
In addition, if that was the case, it just profits the notion that public opinion changes over the course of time, and fluctuates. Nothing more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.