Plans for “vaccine” bracelets to be forced on people at road blocks

Users who are viewing this thread

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Somebody please tell me this is completely full of shit and mean it. There is more at the link:


Former Kansas State Trooper Greg Evensen reports that there are plans for road-blocks to force vaccines with military personnel putting bracelets on people. Those who refuse to take the steel band with a microchip will be put on a prison bus and taken to a quarantine camp.



Evensen also says he believes that many law enforcement officers will reject using this “Gestapo” approach on their fellow citizens, and will question the legitimacy of the orders of what looks like a bunch of criminals in federal government who appear to be seeking to retain their grip on power by setting up an apparatus of state terror, all too reminiscent of that if Nazi Germany where the inmates of concentration camps like Buchenwald were killed by injections in the heart.


Law enforcement officers anxious to restore law and order and arrest really dangerous criminals should look no further than at the people sitting in the top echelons of government, he hints.


“Have you been made aware of the massive roadblock plans to stop all travelers for a vaccine bracelet (stainless steel band with a micro-chip on board) that will force you to take the shot? Refuse it? You will be placed on a prison bus and taken to a quarantine camp. What will you do when your children are NOT allowed into school without the shot? What will you do when you are not allowed into the workplace without the vaccine paperwork? Buy groceries? Go to the bank? Shop anywhere?? Get on a plane, bus or train? Use the toilet in the mall? Nope. Police officers will become loathed, feared, despised and remembered for their “official” duties,” writes Evensen.


Plans for “vaccine” bracelets to be forced on people at road blocks « Case about Bird Flu


What sucks is that the way things are going it's hard to tell sometimes whether stuff like this is completely and utterly impossible to happen here. So please, someone tell me not to worry my pretty little head about something that has to be complete and utter bunk.

Thank you.
MO
 
  • 29
    Replies
  • 737
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
Sounds like some conspiracy theory propaganda bullshit. They can't seriously get away with that shit without the UN saying something, I would think.
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
and wtf is this "vaccine"? Have they been watching Torchwood: Children Of Earth?
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
and wtf is this "vaccine"? Have they been watching Torchwood: Children Of Earth?


I did. That's why when I saw this I went :eek


There has been talk bandied about for months about mandatory "Swine Flu" shots. It's nothing new.

Whether it actually happens remains to be seen.

Hence my request to be told it is absolutely impossible for this to happen.


You know, the state of Texas was going to make GuardASil mandatory for all school girls until it was brought to the general public's attention (by those 'conspiracy blogs') that one of the government dudes working to push it through was also heavily invested in the pharm co putting out the vaccine. I guess he didn't think there was a conflict of interest? :24::mad

Our government is proving it works for its own interests. With vote fraud in the bag, it's not like they have to worry about what their actual bosses (WeThePeople) think.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
reality is, that kind of life will occur, if not already.

"we" just don't know where you are exactly, unless you swipe, call, walk outside, et cetera..

wait, actually, we do know where you are.

i'm not for the actual marking, but i don't mind being tracked. i don't (knowingly) do anything wrong, so.

:shrug:
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
reality is, that kind of life will occur, if not already.

"we" just don't know where you are exactly, unless you swipe, call, walk outside, et cetera..

wait, actually, we do know where you are.

i'm not for the actual marking, but i don't mind being tracked. i don't (knowingly) do anything wrong, so.

:shrug:

You are still not helping:p

not to freak the shit out out of moon, but the gps/rfid chip has been out for years.

Digital Angel

i invested in this many years ago, but sold it (i dont remeber why )

I ain't looking today :p

The first sign it is bull shit is when it states the military would be involved. That is unlawful.

Ah.....it is no longer unlawful under the Military Commissions Act. This past year 10,000 troops have been assigned to our country for 'crowd control'. The big question is would an American soldier fire upon an American citizen?

So, you're not helping either Alien Allen :p
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
not to freak the shit out out of moon, but the gps/rfid chip has been out for years.

Digital Angel

i invested in this many years ago, but sold it (i dont remeber why )

the gps|rfid stuff is more a passive tracking; with the bracelets, who knows what level of technology is in there (if the city-wide deployment of wi-fi, for example, contained other signal-transceivers).. that could id you in seconds to within centimeters.

if you think about it, if one wants the best chance of living (but are not wanting to take the task themselves), then they must be prepared to lose privacy and more, up to and including, liberty itself.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Ah.....it is no longer unlawful under the Military Commissions Act. This past year 10,000 troops have been assigned to our country for 'crowd control'. The big question is would an American soldier fire upon an American citizen?

So, you're not helping either Alien Allen :p

Would you care to point out in the act where it has anything to do with military forces allowed to be used as you are implying?

From what I can see the Act has to do with trials. ;)
 

Codrus

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,668
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
has anyone looked........really looked at the .......U.S. code book?



TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and


(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States

doesnt it seem like the government falls under it very own definition of domestic terrorist?
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Would you care to point out in the act where it has anything to do with military forces allowed to be used as you are implying?

From what I can see the Act has to do with trials. ;)

I could be confused and it's the Patriot Act? Here is a link from Army Times showing our Troops are now at the ready to be on our own streets:


I pulled this paragraph from the link:

"But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities."

Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1 - Army News, news from Iraq, - Army Times


In 2002? More like the Patriot Act to me. I just put Military & Military together... Perhaps I was thinking about the term "Enemy Combatant" and how Americans are not excluded in that classification under the MCA?

Whichever, the fact remains it is now lawful for our troops to be on our streets.
 

MoonOwl

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,573
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
has anyone looked........really looked at the .......U.S. code book?



TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and


(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States

doesnt it seem like the government falls under it very own definition of domestic terrorist?


hehehehehehehehe...... You're gonna end up getting classified yourself if you keep talking like that ;)


You're still not helping!:p But thank you for the clarification...:willy_nilly:
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
I could be confused and it's the Patriot Act? Here is a link from Army Times showing our Troops are now at the ready to be on our own streets:


I pulled this paragraph from the link:

"But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities."

Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1 - Army News, news from Iraq, - Army Times


In 2002? More like the Patriot Act to me. I just put Military & Military together... Perhaps I was thinking about the term "Enemy Combatant" and how Americans are not excluded in that classification under the MCA?

Whichever, the fact remains it is now lawful for our troops to be on our streets.

This is confusing. I see where there was legislation passed about 3 years ago that allowed for some deviations from Posse Comitatus Act that would allow for what you posted. Yet it also states it was repealed.


Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recent legislative events

On September 26, 2006, President Bush urged Congress to consider revising federal laws so that U.S. armed forces could restore public order and enforce laws in the aftermath of a natural disaster, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
These changes were included in the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122), which was signed into law on Oct 17, 2006, subsequently repealed in their entirety.[3]
Section 1076 is titled "Use of the Armed Forces in major public emergencies". It provided that:
The President may employ the armed forces... to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition... the President determines that... domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order... or [to] suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such... a condition... so hinders the execution of the laws... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.[4]
The actual text is on pages 322–323 of the legislation.
As of 2008, these changes have been repealed in their entirety, reverting to the previous wording of the Insurrection Act.[5]
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Why does the title of the linked article mention "Austria"? It was hard for me to seriously read it so i didn't. ;)
 

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I would scream LOUD and LONG if the government tried to FORCE ANY sort of vaccination onto me

Neither of my girls had the Guardasil one, nor the meningacoccal one, and my youngest child is NOT vaccinated at all. (well, I did him homoeopathically)


Good find Moonie....keep those bastards honest babe:thumbup
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top