Physical Proof that the God Exists

[Teru Wong]

Don't worry, She'll shake we leeches off Her back when She's had enough of us fouling our home.....

The increase in the activities of her offsrping (animals) caused by the expansions of our civilizations is interrupting the "life cycles" of the Earth.

It's a worthy idea to stay away from pollutions and over-use of natural resources.
The 3R concept suggested by the environmentalists can be one of them.
Public awareness toward the Global Warming is being appreciated.

The Earth, as our mother-in-common is eternal to all of us.
If the mankind need a proof, science can do.

Teru Wong

 

[kelvin070]

You are almost reaching zombie stage

 

[Minor Axis]

http://teru-wong.yolasite.com/resources/Similarity%20of%20Lives.pdf

I read/skimmed your PDF. It's interesting, I am sympathetic to the concept of Gia and I can't say I disagree with it, but it is "just" a belief, nothing more, definitely not proof. The problem with you hypothesis as with any line of thought with the intent of proving the existence of God is you've put forth a string of statements as fact, when they are just conjecture. The real problem is that we just don't have enough info about the entity called God, about the spiritual plane (if one exists), about the consciousness of God (if it exists), how we fit into all of it, or if we even have the mental capacity to understand and recognize what-is-what if the truth was revealed to us.

 

[Teru Wong]

I read/skimmed your PDF. It's interesting, I am sympathetic to the concept of Gia and I can't say I disagree with it, but it is "just" a belief, nothing more, definitely not proof. The problem with you hypothesis as with any line of thought with the intent of proving the existence of God is you've put forth a string of statements as fact, when they are just conjecture. The real problem is that we just don't have enough info about the entity called God, about the spiritual plane (if one exists), about the consciousness of God (if it exists), how we fit into all of it, or if we even have the mental capacity to understand and recognize what-is-what if the truth was revealed to us.

Thank you very much for your reply.

It is completely different from the Gaia hypothesis. I am talking about "A Conscious Earth". It is a completely new scientific hypothesis with logical proofs. Other planets are used as "Control Experiments". Therefore, my hypothesis is "Planets are living things". To be more specific, I am referring to the "planets" as a higher level of lives.

I am working on it as a lifetime project in a partime basis and sharing my lastest findings on net regularly.

The End will never be an end.
A world revolution of knowledge based on the TRUTH (and Web 2.0, shall be).

Teru Wong

 

[Minor Axis]

It is a completely new scientific hypothesis with logical proofs.

Not to be argumentative, but I did not notice any logical proofs in what I read, just conjecture.

 

[Tomperi]

It is a completely new scientific hypothesis with logical proofs.

You are one of two things: Ignorant or a liar. So which is it?

 

[GuesSAngel]

Where's Tim when ya need him lol

 

[Minor Axis]

Where's Tim when ya need him lol

Well, we'll see if Teru is ready to defend his beliefs.

You are one of two things: Ignorant or a liar. So which is it?

You'll always get more out of a discussion like this by avoiding inflammatory statements. Beliefs are really hard to disprove but when the OP starts talking proof, then there is plenty of opportunity to question without insulting imo.

 

[Tree Fingers]

You see life as so complicated to have started on its own so you blame it on a entity called God?
Dont you see that you are wrapping a problem up with another?
By definition a creator is more complex than the creation.
So how does this explain the uber complex being known as God?

Seriously think about it

And this is ignoring the evidence for Evolution!!!

 

[kelvin070]

This debate abt God won't end till the cows come home.

 

[Tree Fingers]

This debate abt God won't end till the cows come home.

Which is appaling as it should have ended many years ago

 

[Tomperi]

You'll always get more out of a discussion like this by avoiding inflammatory statements. Beliefs are really hard to disprove but when the OP starts talking proof, then there is plenty of opportunity to question without insulting imo.

I know, but it's quite hard to hold back when someone says "scientific hypothesis with logical proofs." when it certainly isn't. It showed a total lack of respect for the scientific method.. And I didn't insult him, I was merely stating a fact.

 

[Tree Fingers]

I know, but it's quite hard to hold back when someone says "scientific hypothesis with logical proofs." when it certainly isn't. It showed a total lack of respect for the scientific method.. And I didn't insult him, I was merely stating a fact.

It is rather funny when they refute scientific facts though like evolution, the Big Bang etc.
However there always quick off the bat to try and use 'science' to prove there points

 

[Tomperi]

It is rather funny when they refute scientific facts though like evolution, the Big Bang etc.
However there always quick off the bat to try and use 'science' to prove there points

:nod::homo:

 

[Minor Axis]

You see life as so complicated to have started on its own so you blame it on a entity called God?
Dont you see that you are wrapping a problem up with another?
By definition a creator is more complex than the creation.
So how does this explain the uber complex being known as God?

Seriously think about it

And this is ignoring the evidence for Evolution!!!

So do you believe in God or not? I can't tell.

This debate abt God won't end till the cows come home.

People like to debate this to make themselves feel better and influence others, but there is no proof either way. However I think it serves a good purpose in causing people to consider other views, possibilities, and fantasies.

It is rather funny when they refute scientific facts though like evolution, the Big Bang etc.
However there always quick off the bat to try and use 'science' to prove there points

I don't think anyone can prove or disprove God, although I tend to discount the traditional view of God, just because the traditional view of Religion is solely based on ancient texts that have been manipulated by mankind and with no applicable standard of proof applied. Clearly belief in God is faith, nothing more, but it's important to note that faith can't be disproven either.

Although it really does not apply in this thread, I'm amused in general when people quote their Holy Book as proof. The scientific method is a logical approach which I believe in. Most/all? of the religious proponents don't use neutral logic to make their points.

 

[Tree Fingers]

So do you believe in God or not? I can't tell.



People like to debate this to make themselves feel better and influence others, but there is no proof either way. However I think it serves a good purpose in causing people to consider other views, possibilities, and fantasies.

God is a See You En Tee

 

[Minor Axis]

God is a See You En Tee

I don't understand what you are saying.

 

[GuesSAngel]

I don't understand what you are saying.

just say it out loud lol you'll figure it out

 

[Minor Axis]

See you entity; Antie?

 

[Teru Wong]

You see life as so complicated to have started on its own so you blame it on a entity called God?

Dont you see that you are wrapping a problem up with another?
By definition a creator is more complex than the creation.
So how does this explain the uber complex being known as God?

Seriously think about it

And this is ignoring the evidence for Evolution!!!

Evolution is a natural process of both the Earth and the animals.

The definitions of living things are restricted to the consciousness of living things. The existence of the brain-like structure is the only way to define “living things”. “Plants” are similar to “Microorganisms” inside the Earth. Once the life cycles of a planet end, the microorganisms of a planet will be dead. Thus, it satisfies the absence of living organisms in other planets.

“Animals” evolved and diversified into different species. The Earth “grows” from simple forms to more complex forms of lives. Evolution of animals (her offspring by reproductions) resulted in diversification of species. In the meanwhile, the diversification of plants (her living tissues) resulted in the evolution of the Earth.

The evolution from microorganisms into animals should be valid. Microorganisms can also be “LIVING TISSUES” of the Earth. In another word, the Earth is a higher level of lives and she evolves through time.

The situations is similar to the animals inside. Both “reproductions” and “plants/microorganisms” are a mixture of the “life cycles” of the Earth. Evolution is a process of the PLANET itself.

Teru Wong