Obama To End Gay Policy
- Thread starter Peter Parka
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
-
32Replies
-
781Views
-
0Participant count
-
Participants list
Would be a good change if it happens. Some of the vets I work with have said that they've had gays in their units from time to time and its treated kinda like an "open secret" if you will...
Only if the physical fitness standards for strength and endurance are maintained. Cutting those in combat troops just because said troops lack a swinging pecker is a bad idea for a number of reasons...
Maybe women at the front lines next?
Only if the physical fitness standards for strength and endurance are maintained. Cutting those in combat troops just because said troops lack a swinging pecker is a bad idea for a number of reasons...
Couldn't agree with you more. :nod:
to me, the current policy is lame....and weather your gay or not doesnt matter if your serving in the military..
i think the saddest part of it is if you're openly gay in the military, even if this goes through and is upheld as a new policy, the stigmas and stuff will still exist and people will still be ostracized for their sexual orientation..thats my opinion..
i think the saddest part of it is if you're openly gay in the military, even if this goes through and is upheld as a new policy, the stigmas and stuff will still exist and people will still be ostracized for their sexual orientation..thats my opinion..
Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
Gays in US military to be allowed to drop massive hints
By Gary Stanton
A US judge will today consider whether to overturn the controversial Don’t Ask Don’t Tell ruling on gays serving in the military in favour of a more considered approach to rampant homophobia.
Current US law severely discriminates against flamboyant gayness of the Quentin Crisp variety, equating effeminacy with an inability to hold a heavy machine gun long enough to fire off twenty rounds into the torso of a passing Afghan civilian.
The rules are based on a passage in the Bible’s Leviticus comic pull-out section which pours scorn on the idea of metrosexuals.
One former soldier told us, “It clearly states that if you have ten men fighting in a trench, the one statistically likely to be gay will attempt to sodomise you during a brief lull in fighting.”
“Or maybe mistake your generous offer to share a tin of corned beef as an invitation to indulge in an amyl-drenched gang bang.”
Gays in US Military
A proposed liberalisation of the policy will see serving gays allowed to come out in a fashion which bigoted hetero comrades will instantly recognise from ‘outrageous’ US sitcoms.
The new atmosphere will permit serving gays to drop the strongest of hints as to their sexual preference, without all the awkwardness that comes from an explicit admission of homosexuality.
A leaked policy document suggests that gays will be advised to drop hints such as “I think Jack looks real nice in those shades” or “Hand to hand combats situations are inherently homoerotic would you not agree? Not that it would appeal to me, but in the heat of battle you can’t rule anything out.”
Arch-conservatives have resisted any change to the law, with borderline headbanger Newt Gingrich claiming that gays tend to squeal when a bomb goes off, alerting the foe to the position of allied forces, and often insist on wasting precious time administering first aid when it isn’t strictly necessary.
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates last night strongly opposed the move insisting it would have enormous consequences for the ability of US forces to secure vital oil supplies in sovereign states.
Addressing a packed conference he said, “It is a mistake to think that the national interest can be defended by heavily-oiled US soldiers insouciantly puffing on a cigarette while wearing one of those low cut string vests - you know the kind which go right down to the navel affording you a view of his washboard abdomen.”
‘Now, if you will excuse me - it’s been a long and difficult day.’
newsarse
By Gary Stanton
A US judge will today consider whether to overturn the controversial Don’t Ask Don’t Tell ruling on gays serving in the military in favour of a more considered approach to rampant homophobia.Current US law severely discriminates against flamboyant gayness of the Quentin Crisp variety, equating effeminacy with an inability to hold a heavy machine gun long enough to fire off twenty rounds into the torso of a passing Afghan civilian.
The rules are based on a passage in the Bible’s Leviticus comic pull-out section which pours scorn on the idea of metrosexuals.
One former soldier told us, “It clearly states that if you have ten men fighting in a trench, the one statistically likely to be gay will attempt to sodomise you during a brief lull in fighting.”
“Or maybe mistake your generous offer to share a tin of corned beef as an invitation to indulge in an amyl-drenched gang bang.”
Gays in US Military
A proposed liberalisation of the policy will see serving gays allowed to come out in a fashion which bigoted hetero comrades will instantly recognise from ‘outrageous’ US sitcoms.
The new atmosphere will permit serving gays to drop the strongest of hints as to their sexual preference, without all the awkwardness that comes from an explicit admission of homosexuality.
A leaked policy document suggests that gays will be advised to drop hints such as “I think Jack looks real nice in those shades” or “Hand to hand combats situations are inherently homoerotic would you not agree? Not that it would appeal to me, but in the heat of battle you can’t rule anything out.”
Arch-conservatives have resisted any change to the law, with borderline headbanger Newt Gingrich claiming that gays tend to squeal when a bomb goes off, alerting the foe to the position of allied forces, and often insist on wasting precious time administering first aid when it isn’t strictly necessary.
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates last night strongly opposed the move insisting it would have enormous consequences for the ability of US forces to secure vital oil supplies in sovereign states.
Addressing a packed conference he said, “It is a mistake to think that the national interest can be defended by heavily-oiled US soldiers insouciantly puffing on a cigarette while wearing one of those low cut string vests - you know the kind which go right down to the navel affording you a view of his washboard abdomen.”
‘Now, if you will excuse me - it’s been a long and difficult day.’
newsarse
Accountable
Well-Known Member
:24: :24:
Minor Axis
Well-Known Member
I'm happy with the new direction for this policy.
“ Do not doubt the direction we are heading and the destination we will reach ”
I love these kinds of statements. Good, strong, eloquent, empty, meaningless rhetoric.
I got in trouble in a meeting once when a visiting muckety-muck stood and with a serious look on his face looked at us and said "This place is what it is because of you." I burst out laughing. I couldn't help it.
:24: Words of real leaders, eh?
Anyone bother to notice it was over a year ago when it was proclaimed that "Obama would end the gay policy" and here we sit a year later and nothing has changed. It's becoming pretty typical of this administration to announce things that never actually happen.
do NOT disparage his exalted Obamaness. How dare you!
KimmyCharmeleon
Well-Known Member
That's politics, just maintaining the status quo.
Last edited by a moderator:
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members