Accountable
Well-Known Member
Okay, I'll try to break it down for you.The fact that why it's not more convinent and cheaper to everyone to stop selling the expensive energy use ones and only sell the energy saving ones. Why do you want to pay higher energy bills? This is about the third time I've asked this and your answers still havent given a valid reason why you are so opposed to it.
*ahem*
- The fact that why it's not more convinent and cheaper to everyone to stop selling the expensive energy use ones and only sell the energy saving ones.
- It's also more convenient and cheaper to have only CocaCola and no Pepsi, Tenant's Extra and no Guiness, and McDonald's and no Fudruckers (or whatever you may have in competition with McD's).
- It's no reason to legislate that one be banned and only the other be made available underfine or punishment.
- Why do you want to pay higher energy bills?
- Again, I don't want to pay higher energy bills. Some people simply prefer the light provided by incandescent light. We have dimmers on some of our lights - adjustable switches to increase or decrease the amount of light a bulb gives off. Flourescent lights don't adjust like that.
- This is about the third time I've asked this and your answers still havent given a valid reason why you are so opposed to it.
- I've given you my answer, Your Thickness. You just can't seem to get that it's not about savings, it's about choice, freedom, and legislature wasting time on trivia.