MJ more influencial?

Users who are viewing this thread

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
At the tourny last night a girl did a speech on Michael Jackson. In the speech she made the claim that MJ had a bigger and better influence on the world then Martin Luther King Jr. did. I thought, personally, this was ridiculous.

Your thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 22
    Replies
  • 511
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Springsteen

Number 2, Rafael!
Messages
13,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.06z
I suppose in the newer era he did. Depends what your beliefs are really. I mean some people may argue that Mark Elliot Zuckerberg (founder of Facebook) is more inflential than Barack Obama.
 

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I suppose in the newer era he did. Depends what your beliefs are really. I mean some people may argue that Mark Elliot Zuckerberg (founder of Facebook) is more inflential than Barack Obama.

I think my mom is more influential the Barack Obama.

Michael Jackson changed a pop genre and Martin Luther King Jr. started a civil rights movement, I just think that's quite a bit more influential.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
MLK didn't start a civil rights movement, he simply continued and added a face to it. The civil rights movement had been happening long before he showed up.

*Edit* I don't in any way mean for that to detract from what he did, I simply mean to say that it was a LONG process.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't think anything that Michael Jackson did had a measureable effect on people's day to day lives.

MLK most certainly did.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

KpAtch3s

Active Member
Messages
993
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
MJ was a pop star, period. He had a big influence on music, but in the large scheme of things it has no profound effect on any bodies life. IMO it's a rediculous statement to make.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
GW, you mentioned that the influence was over the world, not just the US. MJ has it hands down. MLK impacted our culture in ways few people have, but his life made no difference whatever to teenagers in European villages. Michael did.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
How, exactly?
Exactly? Well, I haven't had a chance to interview ;) but the music you hear naturally influences the music you like ... the music you listen to. Millions of kids worldwide flocked to Jackson's concerts. A few of those heard of MLK; fewer still remember who he was, what he did, etc.

The average Japanese kid did not benefit at all from Dr King's awesome actions, but he definitely was influenced by the moonwalk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Exactly? Well, I haven't had a chance to interview ;) but the music you hear naturally influence the music you like ... the music you listen to. Millions of kids worldwide flocked to Jackson's concerts. A few of those heard of MLK; fewer still remember who he was, what he did, etc.

The average Japanese kid did not benefit at all from Dr King's awesome actions, but he definitely was influenced by the moonwalk.


The difference is that Dr Kings actions CHANGED lives. People can vote, go to school, eat in restaurants - actually be treated as human beings because of his actions.

MJ was only entertainment. He changed the way people dance? That's it?

And I would say people EVERYWHERE in the world have had indirect benefits of the cicil rights movements. Racism and cultural hatred are certainly less prevelent since the attitudes toward them changed in the 60's. Certainly still lots of problems, but I think we've had major advances in 50 years.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
At the tourny last night a girl did a speech on Michael Jackson. In the speech she made the claim that MJ had a bigger and better influence on the world then Martin Luther King Jr. did. I thought, personally, this was ridiculous.

Your thoughts?

Sadly, I think its true. This is why the world is so fucked up when people hero worship a kiddie fiddling freak.
 

Tomperi

Active Member
Messages
866
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't think it's true.. The most conspicuous names are not always the most influential. I bet no one has ever heard of Julius Edgar Lilienfeld, and yet he was more influential than King and Jackson put together..
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top