The legislature most likely petitioned the courts to issue a order to comply with the legislature. I wasn't "tried" in the courts as I read it.
Bingo! That's what I thought. The court could not arbitrarily force Sandford to take the money.
The legislature most likely petitioned the courts to issue a order to comply with the legislature. I wasn't "tried" in the courts as I read it.
Bingo! That's what I thought. The court could not arbitrarily force Sandford to take the money.
No they merely enforced a lawful order of the legislature.
NYDaily News-
"Mistress is 'soul mate,' but I want to fall back in love with wife."
OMG, and he really is planning on getting back with his wife??? How stupid can he be to say such things out loud?
His antics suit him well for a Clinton style presidency
His antics suit him well for a Clinton style presidency
NYDaily News-
"Mistress is 'soul mate,' but I want to fall back in love with wife."
OMG, and he really is planning on getting back with his wife??? How stupid can he be to say such things out loud?
saying that her husband’s actions had been “inexcusable”
but that she was willing to forgive him.
A couple of differences:
1. Clinton was running the United States and we were in good shape and not in a war or two.
2. Sanford can't even run a state efficiently and without sneaking out unannounced.
3. Clinton had some casual sexual relationship with an American.
4. Sanford went insane with his "love affair" with a foreigner.
I could go on...but won't.
5. I love Clinton. He's a Democrat.
6. I hate Sanford. He's a Republican.[/QUOTE
I loved the Clinton terms of office. That the republicans saw fit to spend all those millions of our money to prove that a man who got a blow job would try and lie is remarkably stupid.
I don't hate anyone regardless of party.
I appreciate our differences and remain committed to my original statement. I note too that the American people rejected the difference in the complete turnover of goverment.
You have every right to your opinion as do I.
HA! :24:If a state takes federal money, they are obligated to use it as the feds intended. They cannot take federal education dollars and then use it on roads. Same principle.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.