Mark Sanford supreme hypocrite! Question!!!!

[Margene]

:clap Bravo to both posts...

Impeached for infidelity? No

Impeached for abandoning his post? Absolutely.

As far as the infidelity part. You just point your finger and laugh at his hypocrisy and hope the voters turn on him during the next election (since he's the one that decided to make it a public matter)... but I don't think you should impeach for cheating on your wife/husband. That's between the married couple.

He has press conference scheduled for tomorrow. I wonder what that could portend? Maybe he won't last until the next election?

I agree, fidelity is between the couple, not the public.

 

[Docc_eee_aww]

Like clinton, what does this have anything to do with anyone else? Nothing. but he is a Dick.

 

[Minor Axis]

Funny, you weigh in on both Bush (in a bad way) and Clinton (in a good way). Then you accuse someone else of being partisan

Of course you also conveniently didn't answer the question that was posed.

Oh that was an oversight, no, he should not resign... And regarding Bush and Clinton, I trust you would weigh in the exact opposite. Clinton never did the damage to the country Bush did and that has nothing to do with my political leanings. It's a fact.

 

[dt3]

Oh that was an oversight, no, he should not resign... And regarding Bush and Clinton, I trust you would weigh in the exact opposite. Clinton never did the damage to the country Bush did and that has nothing to do with my political leanings. It's a fact.

Clinton was a great president who did no harm to this country. Except for laying the foundation for the housing crisis (not 100% his fault, but he started the ball rolling). And oh yeah, there's at least two times that Clinton was handed Osama Bin Laden on a silver platter and passed on the opportunity to kill or capture him. Great president.

 

[Peter Parka]

And oh yeah, there's at least two times that Clinton was handed Osama Bin Laden on a silver platter and passed on the opportunity to kill or capture him. Great president.

And what legal reason or reason that wouldn't have caused worldwide revoltion did he have to kidnapp or murder Osama?

 

[dt3]

And what legal reason or reason that wouldn't have caused worldwide revoltion did he have to kidnapp or murder Osama?

Considering that at least one chance was in the fall of 2000 (around the time of the USS Cole bombing), I'd say the first bombing of the WTC and the bombing of our embassies in Africa would be a pretty good reason. As well as the fact that Osama had already declared war on us, and Clinton said he would go after him by any means possible. :dunno

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities - Nightly News with Brian Williams- msnbc.com

 

[Peter Parka]

My appologies. I just remember around that time him being given a guided tour round Arsenal football club and buying a shirt for his son) They deserve each other!