Judge Halts Last Guantanamo Trial

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Judge halts last Guantanamo trial
The judge in charge of Guantanamo Bay hearings has dropped the charges in the last trial there, the Pentagon says.
Judge Susan Crawford made the decision days after Judge James Pohl had refused a request from President Barack Obama to suspend all hearings.
Judge Pohl wanted to continue the trial of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a suspect in the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000.
Analysts said the row could have damaged Mr Obama's plan to close the detention centre.
Pentagon officials said Judge Susan Crawford had dismissed the charges against Mr Nashiri without prejudice - meaning that new charges can still be made against him at a later date.
He is expected to remain in custody for the time being.


Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said: "It was [Judge Crawford's] decision, but it reflects the fact that the president has issued an executive order which mandates that the military commissions be halted, pending the outcome of several reviews of our operations down at Guantanamo." The BBC's Jonathan Beale in Washington says the Obama administration ordered a halt to the trials to give it time to review the cases against all the detainees, and to consider who should be tried and how.
Last week, Judge Pohl said the request to halt Mr Nashiri's trial was "unpersuasive" and ruled that the hearing would go ahead.
His ruling appeared to contradict one of the Obama administration's first actions - to instruct prosecutors to ask for the trials of 21 detainees who had been charged to be delayed by 120 days.
All of the proceedings were stopped, with the exception of Mr Nashiri's trial. He was due to appear at the tribunal next Monday.
Mr Obama is expected to meet members of the families of those killed in the USS Cole attack later on Friday at the White House.
'Values and ideals'
The attack on the USS Cole while it was moored off Yemen left 17 US service personnel dead and 50 injured.
Mr Nashiri was arrested in the United Arab Emirates in 2002 and eventually transferred to Guantanamo.
He is accused of conspiring to help two Islamic militants who steered an explosives-laden barge alongside the ship.
Mr Obama ordered the review of military trials for terrorism suspects last week. He also ordered the closure, within one year, of the Guantanamo detention centre.
He said the US would continue to fight terrorism but would maintain its "values and ideals" as well.
Some 250 inmates accused of having links to terrorism remain in the facility.
The legal process for these prisoners has been widely criticised on the grounds the US military acts as jailer, judge and jury.

Story from BBC NEWS:
 
  • 33
    Replies
  • 753
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Makedde

Active Member
Messages
613
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Great, another terrorist not getting what he deserves.

What terrorist? He is suspected of terrorism, nothing more.

Until he is found guilty of his crime, he cannot be labeled a terrorist. Innocent until proven guilty.:thumbup
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
What terrorist? He is suspected of terrorism, nothing more.

Until he is found guilty of his crime, he cannot be labeled a terrorist. Innocent until proven guilty.:thumbup

I rep you for that Mak. Because some people who are suspected did you get that? SUSPECTED of terrorism by the Patriot act and during Bush's presidency were thrown into Gitmo with no trial!
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
What terrorist? He is suspected of terrorism, nothing more.

Until he is found guilty of his crime, he cannot be labeled a terrorist. Innocent until proven guilty.:thumbup
That's why he was on trial! If anything, suspending it will only delay his release if he is innocent!
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
That's why he was on trial! If anything, suspending it will only delay his incarceration if he is innocent!

You just used the magic word my friend.

Delay. Not pardon.

So he'll still be put to jail time even if he is innocent?
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
You just used the magic word my friend.

Delay. Not pardon.

So he'll still be put to jail time even if he is innocent?
He'll be held in jail until the trial resumes. That's standard procedure. Typically judges don't set bail for suspected terrorists.

*Edit*And you're right, I didn't mean to say delay his incarceration, I meant his release ;)
 

Ryder

Mod hopeful
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
He'll be held in jail until the trial resumes. That's standard procedure. Typically judges don't set bail for suspected terrorists.

*Edit*And you're right, I didn't mean to say delay his incarceration, I meant his release ;)

That just shows you that just cause I'm 13 going on 14 doesn't mean Im not in touch with the world.
 

HottyToddyChick

Toes in the water...
Messages
16,140
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The whole thing pisses me off. Some of these countries hire these guys to be terrorists and now we're releasing them somewhere where they are a danger to society and will be rewarded, rather than punished, for their actions? Boo on Obama for this one.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
First I've evr heard of convicted terrorists being released or are you one of these people who just believes that suspected someone of terrorism is a good enough reason to lock them up indefinately? I guess you should just hope you never get suspected of terrorism!
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
First I've evr heard of convicted terrorists being released or are you one of these people who just believes that suspected someone of terrorism is a good enough reason to lock them up indefinately? I guess you should just hope you never get suspected of terrorism!
Did you understand my point, Pete? By halting the trial, they're making their prison stay longer!

I think it's crazy that the Dems have been screaming for years about holding these guys without trials. Then a Dem gets elected President and HALTS ALL THE TRIALS! Does nobody else see that?
 

HottyToddyChick

Toes in the water...
Messages
16,140
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm sure you won't agree with me, Peter, and I'm not asking you to, but I think it makes more sense to make one person suffer than to possibly let thousands die. They are there for a reason- we didn't just pick them up off the streets and say "Hey, we have an empty cell out at Gitmo. You're going there because we need to fill it."
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
I don't understand where they go if it's suspended?

They stay in guantanamo? I am against inhumane treatment of guantanamo, but halting the trials seems to just halt the one good aspect Guantanamo has, which is the justice that can be given out, all be it sometimes eventually.
 
78,878Threads
2,185,399Messages
4,961Members
Back
Top