in six month we'll see the largest tax increases in history

Users who are viewing this thread

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
In just six months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
- The 25% bracket rises to 28%
- The 28% bracket rises to 31%
- The 33% bracket rises to 36%
- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

Second Wave: Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

The “Special Needs Kids Tax” This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the AMT won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. The major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.

Read more: http://www.atr.org/sixmonths.html?content=5171#ixzz0t0qf9Pkw

http://www.atr.org/sixmonths.html?content=5171#ixzz0t04hVzpm

I know I'm certainly looking forward to this. Higher taxes always make me tingle deep down inside... oh wait, that's just the nausea. Raising taxes on businesses even further and hurting small businesses, which account for the biggest job creating area of the economy. Our "job creating" President is doing nothing but destroy our economy, and it makes me absolutely sick to my stomach. But I'm sure that this is all you liberal's wet dream... taking money away from people and redistributing it to whomever you deem has the greatest need. That sounds like something I've heard before... oh wait, I have... that's the basis of Marxism.
 
  • 60
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Codrus

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,668
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
2444018790_b72d546ed7.jpg
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
not you...that was really the only way i could express what i did after reading it..***head down, face in hand"

:24:

I didn't think it was me based on things you've posted previously ;) and yeah, that was my response, along with overwhelming nausea.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
That sounds like something I've heard before... oh wait, I have... that's the basis of Marxism.

Dude, I feel your pain about the impending tax increases but please stop belittling your arguments by regurgitating Glenn Beck's talking points. This has nothing to do with Marxism, Obama is not a Marxist nor a Socialist. Not even close. Not even in the same part of the political spectrum. He's pretty much just like all of your previous presidents, a puppet to corporations, the only difference being is who pulls the strings: the Democrats favour international corporations and the Republicans national ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Dude, I feel your pain about the impending tax increases but please stop belittling your arguments by regurgitating Glenn Beck's talking points. This has nothing to do with Marxism, Obama is not a Marxist nor a Socialist. Not even close. Not even in the same part of the political spectrum. He's pretty much just like all of your previous presidents, a puppet to corporations, the only difference being is who pulls the strings: the Democrats favour international corporations and the Republicans national ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism

This country is slowly but surely (though much faster now that Obama is at the helm) moving towards a state of the government providing everything for you. Tax the rich, give to the poor (but be sure to take enough money for themselves), redistribute that wealth.

From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.

That's was a Karl Marx slogan, though not his own creation; and what I see in modern day Democrats/liberals. As a Libertarian, Obamacare and all of these tax increases go against the very core of what I believe in. Obama is on the same side of the political spectrum as socialism, though you're right, he's another international puppet. Personally, as far as puppets go, I'd prefer a domestic puppet rather than an international one. But I'd much rather have a President that harkens back to the founding fathers... someone that reveres and respects the Constitution and all that it stands for. Someone not afraid to call things how they are. Someone like... Ron Paul.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
oh, and as far as what I said being a Beck talking point... I didn't realize that. I just made the wealth redistribution comment and it reminded me of the Marx slogan.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Dude, I feel your pain about the impending tax increases but please stop belittling your arguments by regurgitating Glenn Beck's talking points. This has nothing to do with Marxism, Obama is not a Marxist nor a Socialist. Not even close. Not even in the same part of the political spectrum. He's pretty much just like all of your previous presidents, a puppet to corporations, the only difference being is who pulls the strings: the Democrats favour international corporations and the Republicans national ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism

Dont argue, you've got it all wrong! If you're in the USA, being nice to more unfortunates = you are a Commie bastard!

:24::surrender
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
oh, and as far as what I said being a Beck talking point... I didn't realize that. I just made the wealth redistribution comment and it reminded me of the Marx slogan.

Fair enough. I think to most Americans, a true Marxist would be REALLY frightening compared to the Obaminator! :D
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Fair enough. I think to most Americans, a true Marxist would be REALLY frightening compared to the Obaminator! :D

Without a doubt... they'd also stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected ;) Unfortunately, the same goes for most Libertarians :(
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I know... it seriously makes me sick. I'm really hoping the Ron makes another run at the Presidency in 2012, but unfortunately that'd put him at 77 when he'd take office. I don't think most voters would actually go for that.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I know... it seriously makes me sick. I'm really hoping the Ron makes another run at the Presidency in 2012, but unfortunately that'd put him at 77 when he'd take office. I don't think most voters would actually go for that.

he has contemporaries tho? there must be others that share his beliefs? Hopefully they stand a chance, though only if they manage to overcome the media somehow. Thankfully I was reading someone the other day that more and more Americans are using the internet now as their primary news source. By the next election there's a chance that a significant amount of people will be able to make a more informed choice thanks to rise of the independent news source.

Going back on topic for a second, how do you think Obama will spin this one? It flies in the face of a lot of his campaign promises, from what I can see.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

FYI, the Death Tax primarily was rescinded to help the wealthy, not average citizens, although I'm sure it makes them feel good too.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
FYI, the Death Tax primarily was rescinded to help the wealthy, not average citizens, although I'm sure it makes them feel good too.

Your point? It's still bullshit that the government can just steal 55% of your money simply because you died. It's theft, plain and simple. I don't give a shit if it's about rich or poor, it's still wrong on so many levels.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
he has contemporaries tho? there must be others that share his beliefs? Hopefully they stand a chance, though only if they manage to overcome the media somehow. Thankfully I was reading someone the other day that more and more Americans are using the internet now as their primary news source. By the next election there's a chance that a significant amount of people will be able to make a more informed choice thanks to rise of the independent news source.

The closest he has in a contemporary is his son, who is running for senate in Kentucky. There are a few other libertarian-leaning members of the Republican party that are currently in office, but none quite like Paul.

Going back on topic for a second, how do you think Obama will spin this one? It flies in the face of a lot of his campaign promises, from what I can see.

He'll say that it was necessary, and then blame Bush.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The closest he has in a contemporary is his son, who is running for senate in Kentucky. There are a few other libertarian-leaning members of the Republican party that are currently in office, but none quite like Paul.

I'm sure he'll have inspired some others come the next election. I can't imagine libertarianism will die simply because Paul isn't running.

He'll say that it was necessary, and then blame Bush.

In his defense, that's what I'd do!
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
In his defense, that's what I'd do!

The whole blame Bush song and dance has gotten really old... it's like he thinks he can skate by his entire term blaming Bush for anything and everything. Hell, they blamed him for the oil leak in the gulf... what's next, the hot weather on the east coast?

It's time for him to own up and admit that he's failed, big time.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The whole blame Bush song and dance has gotten really old... it's like he thinks he can skate by his entire term blaming Bush for anything and everything. Hell, they blamed him for the oil leak in the gulf... what's next, the hot weather on the east coast?

It's time for him to own up and admit that he's failed, big time.

Well Bush certainly left him some real hurdles to climb.

I would say it's too early declare a fail just yet, economic recovery can take a while, you should give him most of his first tern before declaring a complete fail. Although, on his foreign policy issues, I think you're right.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top