House Approves Ban on Anti-Gay Discrimination

[All Else Failed]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/w...gin&adxnnlx=1194484961-3KaDCMA3tDfHhA/43++qBA

 

[NightWarrior]

This will be interesting. Fire a gay person for work performance and see the lawsuit that ensues. Why can't the discrimination laws be broad enough to cover everything disriminatory? We have age ones, race ones, sexist ones, and now gay ones. Seems like a lot of wasted paper to me.

 

[All Else Failed]

Better to have them, than not. Plus you can file a lawsuit no matter what. I don't think its a waste of paper to ensure that people don't get discriminated against for their sexual preference.

 

[TheOriginalJames]

Better to have them, than not. Plus you can file a lawsuit no matter what. I don't think its a waste of paper to ensure that people don't get discriminated against for their sexual preference.

That's not what he's saying. He's saying make any discrimination against age, race, color, creed, sexual preference illegal all in one bill under one law.

 

[All Else Failed]

That's not what he's saying. He's saying make any discrimination against age, race, color, creed, sexual preference illegal all in one bill under one law.

True, that would make sense to just combine them.

 

[NightWarrior]

That's not what he's saying. He's saying make any discrimination against age, race, color, creed, sexual preference illegal all in one bill under one law.

Exactly. Thanks for the clarification. I read that again and I can see how it might have sounded. Bad me.

 

[All Else Failed]

No problem, I still love you. ;^)

 

[Maulds]

:turninggay2:
aw jeez, good thing for you guys it passed

 

[NightWarrior]

I was hoping he was referring to the avy :dunno

 

[All Else Failed]

I prefer that kind of underwear on women rather than thongs. (in your avatar)

 

[TheOriginalJames]

Boy shorts? Gay?

 

[All Else Failed]

yeah, they're cute on women.