Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
Like what films?
U - 571 for example
Like what films?
Gladiator was atrocious too, totally inaccurate as to the lives of Gladiators.
I guess reality doesn't make such good films?
U - 571 for example
If it was bigger and better, I could understand it but it's worse, especially when Hollywood changes history to give the Americans credit for others achievements, talk about insecure!:willy_nilly:
I don't know what you're all complaining about - The English are pure evil through and through.
Any person tries to make themselves out to be the best in the story. It's a natural habit and why you think that Hollywood would be the exception to that is beyond me.
I mean seriously... why not just take it for what it is (entertainment) and be done with it? No point in getting all worked up and upset over something that doesn't mean anything, IMHO.
I don't know what you're all complaining about - The English are pure evil through and through.
remember the spielberg movie 'amistad'?......the one the made the british look good and the americans look bad......which actually flopped in america........bloody good film too
I really dont get why film and drama makers have to make historical dramas and films, inaccurate. I've just watched nowhere boy and the shit in that is terrible, same with the Tudors which someone started a thread about. There really is no need when most of the time, the history is far more interesting and dosent lead to a bunch of dumb arses thinking that Scots 800 odd years ago lived in hobbit holes and tghe king of England made his nobles shag all the Scottish virgins. The battle of Stiring Bridge in Braveheart won an Oscar but in truth was COMPLETELY inaccurate. the Scots won by a much more interesting guerrilla warfare and you never hear Wallace's co conspirator, Andrew Moray, mentioned, oh but he was so shit he died in this battle!:sarcasm
Oh, and dont even get me started on U-571 where Hollywood insulted brave British soldiers by claiming credit for this.
anything that makes america bad you like. i see a trend
I watched the movie "Elizabeth," and I think (though don't know 100% sure) that it is historically accurate, and it was a fabulous movie! though most light headed American movie goers wouldn't think so.
thats the problem......they want her to invade france with rapid fire machine guns
I watched the movie "Elizabeth," and I think (though don't know 100% sure) that it is historically accurate, and it was a fabulous movie! though most light headed American movie goers wouldn't think so.
Is it?
I thought about watching it, but I was worried it might be a bit feminist... Also Clive Owen is in it right? He's a turd.
lol he may be a turd but what is the story of Queen Elizabeth if not feminist.
and what do you have against feminists? is it only radical feminism or all feminism? :cool
All feminism. It drives me nuts. I'm more than happy to watch a film about Elizabeth, as she was a great monarch and fine leader. I'm less thrilled to watch a film about how Elizabeth was a great leader, despite or because of being a woman.
Or Womyn, as a feminist would say.
remember the spielberg movie 'amistad'?......the one the made the british look good and the americans look bad......which actually flopped in america........bloody good film too
remember the spielberg movie 'amistad'?......the one the made the british look good and the americans look bad......which actually flopped in america........bloody good film too
I watched the movie "Elizabeth," and I think (though don't know 100% sure) that it is historically accurate, and it was a fabulous movie! though most light headed American movie goers wouldn't think so.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.