I thought it was a crazy idea and she would never accept.
I think it boils down to how the democrats handled things this week as they prepared for the next congress.
She is not a flaming liberal. But the congress is moving that way.
This might be a calculated brilliant move to separate herself from the far left who are in control now.
The country will not recover in 4 years and she will have the added experience on her resume.
Unless there is a miraculous turnaround in two years she will leave and start the campaign for president in 2012
She is strong on international issues but know nuts abt economics
Very goods analysis. Should anyone want to take the time and review the differences between his Highness and Hillary you will find that when it comes to foreign affairs they do not agree on anything. For all intents and purposes she called Obama an idiot during the campaign when it came to foreign affairs. She's right. Frankly, she is much more of a hawk than the average liberal. She's got balls and she's not stupid. What she is doing is called political positioning.
Also very correct.
I was wondering when somebody would agree with me
Now you just lowered yourself a notch
Even an idiot can be right sometimes, just look at Trekguy. Not that I calling you or Trekguy idiots.
I wonder how long before they get tired of the Change that is put into place. :24:
Yes, apparently Obama defines "change" as Bush to Clinton 3rd term.
Even an idiot can be right sometimes, just look at Trekguy. Not that I calling you or Trekguy idiots.
:thumbup...nothing good can come from a relatively liberal leader.
:thumbup
It is refreshing taking a break from political talk. I come back and it's the same old round and round and some portion of you continue to bad mouth Obama and he's not even in office yet. Such is the nature of partisan politics. Just admit, (you know who you are) you'd love to see him fall on his sword because you're desperately seeking vindication that nothing good can come from a relatively liberal leader.
Change in direction does not mean the government top spots are staffed with all new unheard of people as even the unheard of people guarantee nothing in the way of political/policy change. But a major difference is that in Obama you have a leader who is a leader and is going to direct change (whether you like the direction or not) vs the previous joe-six pack president who hired in people who told him what to do.
It's interesting the Obama was giving press conferences while joe was pardoning turkeys.
Actually, I don't really believe that nothing good can come from a relatively liberal leader... just that mostly nothing good can come from a relatively liberal leader. But thanks for giving me the quote in the first place.Funny!
I like you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.