Fair tax ?

[Stone]

Seriously, TM.......I'm just not into rep count meaning anything of significance......
The more you post red reps.... only means I'm being effective

And defacing my visitor messages page doesn't hurt me, either.....it merely shows how childishly vindictive you are.

 

[The Man]

What do you think is a fair tax..either you have a response or you dont...its pretty simple.
You can post to support your number......but if you have to ask questions as to what you feel is a fair tax after it has been explained {and you acknowledged you understood how it works} then you are just thread crapping.
Have you noticed how people stopped posting in this thread....just like the other threads you start to post in?
I am trying to be nice here stone...no one digs the shit but you.
I am not saying this to be rude...but you just dont take a clue..regardless of who gives it.

 

[Stone]

What do you think is a fair tax..either you have a response or you dont...its pretty simple.
You can post to support your number......but if you have to ask questions as to what you feel is a fair tax after it has been explained {and you acknowledged you understood how it works} then you are just thread crapping.
Have you noticed how people stopped posting in this thread....just like the other threads you start to post in?
I am trying to be nice here stone...no one digs the shit but you.
I am not saying this to be rude...but you just dont take a clue..regardless of who gives it.

What do you think is a fair tax.

Asked and answered a long time ago......I'm not an economist. I have no experience in defining taxation rates.
And I publicly admitted to this.

But you have made claims and it was in your opening post where you claimed:

What would be a fair tax if it was applied equally to all earners across the board{all tax brackets}
This include corps, capital gains,everything..all earnings.
No property tax ...extra gas tax...tobacco tax ... beer tax...just one tax even across the board for all earners...regardless of how the earnings are obtained or what they are spent on.
The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired
This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

That is your stated claim and I'm here to now challenge you on at least one important point:


How do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )

That is 'debate' and you are avoiding it.

 

[Stone]

TM....stating reasons for giving me red reps like 'fuck you troll' only makes me laugh....

 

[Stone]

and fuck you again...and every time you post in my threads or respond to any of my posts...fuck you troll

Good one....but.....
a little over the top?
.

 

[The Man]

So show me where I stated that 25 percent takes care of current expenditures .

 

[Stone]

So show me where I stated that 25 percent takes care of current expenditures .

What would be a fair tax if it was applied equally to all earners across the board{all tax brackets}
This include corps, capital gains,everything..all earnings.
No property tax ...extra gas tax...tobacco tax ... beer tax...just one tax even across the board for all earners...regardless of how the earnings are obtained or what they are spent on.
The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired
This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

You posted it, slick...........

 

[Stone]

So, TM......

How do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )

 

[The Man]

I didnt say 25 percent covers the current expenditures.
I said I propose 25 will cover ALL combined govt spending.
Again note the word ALL

 

[The Man]

Good one....but.....
a little over the top?
.

Just a heads up..reps are considered private and against the rules to post

 

[Stone]

Just a heads up..reps are considered private and against the rules to post

You see anything in that post that states I took it from the rep page?........

 

[The Man]

Show me where I stated 25 percent takes care of current expenditures.

 

[Stone]

I didnt say 25 percent covers the current expenditures.
I said I propose 25 will cover ALL combined govt spending.
Again note the word ALL

Here it is again:

What would be a fair tax if it was applied equally to all earners across the board{all tax brackets}
This include corps, capital gains,everything..all earnings.
No property tax ...extra gas tax...tobacco tax ... beer tax...just one tax even across the board for all earners...regardless of how the earnings are obtained or what they are spent on.
The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired
This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

So....my question follows:

akaBrett/TM.......how do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )

 

[The Man]

You keep saying it....SHOW ME WHERE I SAID 25 PERCENT TAKES CARE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES .
Are you being dishonest again stone?
Seems to be the norm for you lately hey....pathetic.

 

[The Man]

Again show me where I said 25 percent covers current expenditures.
You are saying 25 percent covers current expenditures.

 

[Stone]

You keep saying it....SHOW ME WHERE I SAID 25 PERCENT TAKES CARE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES .
Are you being dishonest again stone?
Seems to be the norm for you lately hey....pathetic.

What would be a fair tax if it was applied equally to all earners across the board{all tax brackets}
This include corps, capital gains,everything..all earnings.
No property tax ...extra gas tax...tobacco tax ... beer tax...just one tax even across the board for all earners...regardless of how the earnings are obtained or what they are spent on.
The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired
This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

So my question follows:

How do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )




I ought to be charging you for these debate lessons......

 

[The Man]

Come on stone where did i say 25 percent covers current expenditures.

 

[The Man]

So my question follows:

How do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )




I ought to be charging you for these debate lessons......

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government

Who said it did
You keep claiming I said that...but i havent said that.
I proposed a 25 percent fair tax...and the rest of our money should be ours.

 

[Stone]

Come on stone where did i say 25 percent covers current expenditures.

Asked and answered ....

 

[Stone]

Who said it did
You keep claiming I said that...but i havent said that.
I proposed a 25 percent fair tax...and the rest of our money should be ours.

This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

How do you intend to fund invasions into foreign countries like your proposed chickenhawk argument to invade Pakistan?

http://forums.techguy.org/controvers...-pakistan.html

If a 25% tax covers the current expenditures of the Federal Government, increased military spending will increase the need for additional revenue.
So.....where do you propose it comes from?



(Johnfromokc.......you might be interested in reading that link, especially the part where akaBrett suggests Israel takes command of our troops )