Reading the FDR thread and of course with the "birther" movement still in the news, it got me to thinking.
Can any conspriacy theory ever be put to rest?
Dealing with the more current issue of Obama's birth certificate, the preponderance of evidence shows he was indeed born in Hawaii. There are birth announcements in the papers of the day. The state of Hawaii has certified it and probably more than once in Obama's lifetime as he certainly had more than one passport issued. The state department issued a passport based on that birth certificate long before he ever ran for office.
Yet still there is this brouhaha over it.
So I want to know, despite the most concrete evidence, can any theory ever be laid to rest?
I don't want this to dissolve into nastiness, but realize any answer would have to address arguments specific to any theory. Can we play nice?
Can any conspriacy theory ever be put to rest?
Dealing with the more current issue of Obama's birth certificate, the preponderance of evidence shows he was indeed born in Hawaii. There are birth announcements in the papers of the day. The state of Hawaii has certified it and probably more than once in Obama's lifetime as he certainly had more than one passport issued. The state department issued a passport based on that birth certificate long before he ever ran for office.
Yet still there is this brouhaha over it.
So I want to know, despite the most concrete evidence, can any theory ever be laid to rest?
I don't want this to dissolve into nastiness, but realize any answer would have to address arguments specific to any theory. Can we play nice?