Broncos are exacerbating my bipolarism ;)

Users who are viewing this thread

hart

V.I.P User
Messages
6,086
Reaction score
8
Tokenz
0.01z
Well I don't expect to win the Super Bowl, but then I really don't know what to expect from the Broncos, one thing about them they aren't exactly predictable ;) That's why they exacerbate my bipolarism LMAO
 
  • 52
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.42z
why not give him more than a season to give it a shot? its not easy being a QB in the league. if he doesn't do the job in three years, then you trade him or cut him. i thought if he had a bit better front line blocking he would have torn the Patriots apart

You won't need two years to determine he is not gonna be even average and have to be replaced.

He is a hard worker and spent the summer on his mechanics and they still suck. IMO

This year they used him in the best way they could to utilize his running skills.

Next year all the teams will know how to stop that offense which already is pretty bad.
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
fuck me that was an exciting finish in Mile High - however someone please explain the new OT rules to me, i thought we had seen the end of sudden death, hell when the ref explained the proceudres at coin toss did he not say " both teams get an equal oppooruntity to score" how come Pitt did not have a shot? I think it highly unfair that basically Denver won the game on a coin toss
 

pjbleek

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,839
Reaction score
76
Tokenz
803.20z
fuck me that was an exciting finish in Mile High - however someone please explain the new OT rules to me, i thought we had seen the end of sudden death, hell when the ref explained the proceudres at coin toss did he not say " both teams get an equal oppooruntity to score" how come Pitt did not have a shot? I think it highly unfair that basically Denver won the game on a coin toss
because Denver scored a TD and not a field goal. if Denver had scored a FG then Pittsburgh would have been given a shot.
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
because Denver scored a TD and not a field goal. if Denver had scored a FG then Pittsburgh would have been given a shot.
well because teams do not always score a TD each possession I maintain to keep it fair Pitt should have been give one set of downs to try and match the TD
 

pjbleek

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,839
Reaction score
76
Tokenz
803.20z
well because teams do not always score a TD each possession I maintain to keep it fair Pitt should have been give one set of downs to try and match the TD

good point, but I think if it is set up like college for OT then it will be a never ending battle. but they shouldn't have the OT kickoff and start right on the opposing teams 20?
 

Staci

old, but new
Messages
20,018
Reaction score
14
Tokenz
0.00z
the game yesterday didnt help did it :D

as a friend pointed out....it took longer to go over the OT rules than it did for them to score :D
 

pjbleek

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,839
Reaction score
76
Tokenz
803.20z
the game yesterday didnt help did it :D

as a friend pointed out....it took longer to go over the OT rules than it did for them to score :D
as told by the Marx Brothers.....


Driftwood: Well, things seem to be getting better around the country.
Fiorello: I don't know. I'm a stranger here myself.
Driftwood: Say, I just remembered - I came back here looking for somebody. You don't know who it is, do ya?
Fiorello: It's a funny thing - it just slipped my mind.
Driftwood: Oh- I know, I know... the greatest tenor in the world. That's what I'm after.
Fiorello: Why, I'm his manager!
Driftwood: Whose manager?
Fiorello: The greatest tenor in the world.
Driftwood: The fella that sings at the opera here?
Fiorello: Sure...
Driftwood: What's his name?
Fiorello: What do you care? Besides I can't pronounce it. What do you want with him?
Driftwood: Well, I uh, I want to sign him up for the New York Opera Company. Do you know America is waiting to hear him sing?
Fiorello: Well, he can sing loud, but he can't sing that loud.
Driftwood: Well, I think I can get America to meet him half-way. Could he sail tomorrow?
Fiorello: You pay him enough money, he could sail yesterday. How much you pay him?
Driftwood: Well, I don't know... (muttering aside to himself) let's see, a thousand dollars a night... I'm entitled to a small profit... (to Fiorello) How about ten dollars a night?
Fiorello: Ten? Ten dolla- ha ha ha ha ha! I'll take it...
Driftwood: All right, but remember, I get 10% for negotiating the deal.
Fiorello: Yes, and I get 10% for being the manager. How much does that leave him?
Driftwood: That leaves him - uh, $8.00.
Fiorello: Eight dollars, huh? Well, he sends a five dollars home to his mother...
Driftwood: Well, that leaves him $3.00.
Fiorello: Can he live in New York on $3.00?
Driftwood: Like a prince. Of course he won't be able to eat, but he can live like a prince. However, out of that $3.00, you know, he'll have to pay an income tax...
Fiorello: Ah, there's income tax...
Driftwood: Yes, there's a federal tax, and a state tax, and a city tax, and a street tax, and a sewer tax.
Fiorello: How much does this come to?
Driftwood: Well, I figure if he doesn't sing too often, he can break even.
Fiorello: All right, we take it.
Driftwood: All right, fine. Now here are the contracts. You just put his name at the top and you sign at the bottom. There's no need of you reading that because these are duplicates.
Fiorello: Yeah, they's a duplicates.
Driftwood: I say they're duplicates.
Fiorello: Why sure they's a duplicates...
Driftwood: Don't you know what duplicates are?
Fiorello: Sure. There's five kids up in Canada.
Driftwood: Well, I wouldn't know about that. I haven't been to Canada in years. Well go ahead and read it.
Fiorello: What does it say?
Driftwood: Well, go on and read it!
Fiorello: You read it.
Driftwood: All right, I'll read it to ya. Can you hear?
Fiorello: I haven't heard anything yet. Did you say anything?
Driftwood: Well, I haven't said anything worth hearing.
Fiorello: Well, that's why I didn't hear anything.
Driftwood: Well, that's why I didn't say anything.
Fiorello: Can you read?
Driftwood (struggling to read the fine print): I can read but I can't see it. I don't seem to have it in focus here. If my arms were a little longer, I could read it. You haven't got a baboon in your pocket, have ya? Here, here, here we are. Now I've got it. Now pay particular attention to this first clause because it's most important. It says the, uh, "The party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the party of the first part." How do you like that? That's pretty neat, eh?
Fiorello: No, it's no good.
Driftwood: What's the matter with it?
Fiorello: I don't know. Let's hear it again.
Driftwood: It says the, uh, "The party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the party of the first part."
Fiorello: (pausing) That sounds a little better this time.
Driftwood: Well, it grows on ya. Would you like to hear it once more?
Fiorello: Uh, just the first part.
Driftwood: What do you mean? The party of the first part?
Fiorello: No, the first part of the party of the first part.
Driftwood: All right. It says the, uh, "The first part of the party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the first part of the party of the first part shall be known in this contract" - look, why should we quarrel about a thing like this? We'll take it right out, eh?
Fiorello: Yeah, it's a too long, anyhow. (They both tear off the tops of their contracts.) Now, what do we got left?
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Fiorello: Hey, look, why can'ta the first part of the second party be the second part of the first party? Then a you gotta something.
Driftwood: Well, look, uh, rather than go through all that again, what do you say?
Fiorello: Fine. (They rip out a portion of the contract.)
Driftwood: Now, uh, now I've got something you're bound to like. You'll be crazy about it.
Fiorello: No, I don't like it.
Driftwood: You don't like what?
Fiorello: Whatever it is. I don't like it.
Driftwood: Well, don't let's break up an old friendship over a thing like that. Ready?...
Fiorello: OK! (Another part is torn off.) Now the next part, I don't think you're gonna like.
Driftwood: Well, your word's good enough for me. (They rip out another part.) Now then, is my word good enough for you?
Fiorello: I should say not.
Driftwood: Well, that takes out two more clauses. (They rip out two more parts.) Now, "The party of the eighth part..."
Fiorello: No, that'sa no good. (more ripping.) No.
Driftwood: "The party of the ninth part..."
Fiorello: No, that'sa no good, too. (they rip the contracts again until there's practically nothing left.) Hey, how is it my contract is skinnier than yours?
Driftwood: Well, I don't know. You must've been out on a tear last night. But anyhow we're all set now, aren't we?
Fiorello: Oh sure.
Driftwood (offering his pen to sign the contract): Now just, uh, just you put your name right down there and then the deal is, uh, legal.
Fiorello: I forgot to tell you. I can't write.
Driftwood: Well, that's all right, there's no ink in the pen anyhow. But listen, it's a contract, isn't it?
Fiorello: Oh sure.
Driftwood: We got a contract...
Fiorello: You bet.
Driftwood: No matter how small it is...
Fiorello: Hey, wait, wait. What does this say here? This thing here.
Driftwood: Oh, that? Oh, that's the usual clause. That's in every contract. That just says uh, it says uh, "If any of the parties participating in this contract is shown not to be in their right mind, the entire agreement is automatically nullified."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know...
Driftwood: It's all right, that's, that's in every contract. That's, that's what they call a 'sanity clause'.
Fiorello: Ha ha ha ha ha! You can't fool me! There ain't no Sanity Clause!
Driftwood: Well, you win the white carnation.
Fiorello: I give this to Riccardo.
 

rback33

Back Again... but reformed...
Messages
4,570
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
the game yesterday didnt help did it :D

as a friend pointed out....it took longer to go over the OT rules than it did for them to score :D

LMAO Fuck you Staci....


And I agree that they need to adopt CFB rules for OT... MUCH better...
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
They've changed the playoff overtime rules. If you score a FG, then the other team gets a chance and can tie with a FG or win with a TD. after the first time it's sudden death though. So it's a hybrid of sudden death and the CFB system.
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
They've changed the playoff overtime rules. If you score a FG, then the other team gets a chance and can tie with a FG or win with a TD. after the first time it's sudden death though. So it's a hybrid of sudden death and the CFB system.
do you, or anyone else think what happened to the stillers was any fairer than the old system, whereby a couple of reasonabale passes puts a FG within range which can win the game without the losing side even touching the ball

i maintain that because ( with the exception of drew brees's saints lately) a team will not score a major each possession, then the prosepect of games being prolonged in OT is slim, and thus pittsburgh should have being given a shot
 

hart

V.I.P User
Messages
6,086
Reaction score
8
Tokenz
0.01z
See why I say it exacerbates my bipolarism?! First quarter we had 6 f*cking yards. 6! For a whole quarter. I was cussing and screaming so much I looked down and my poor dog was in his kennel thinking I was mad at him! THANK GOD for Defense, kept them to 6, despite themselves. And their QB was hobbling along. So okay, 2nd quarter we make some up-still winable, but nothing to get excited about.

Then the 3rd quarter. HOLY SHIT! We go off our merry way-looking like most Broncos 4th quarter, okay, we got this one in the bag, their quarterback (can't spell his name) still hobbling along. Okay, I can relax

Then 4th
quarter. WHAT THE HELL?! Who gave their QB a bionic leg? Seriously, did he take a numbing pill- cause all the sudden he can move and he does and makes some plays-and we look like sh*t! Are we going throw this damn game over at the last minute. AND THE REFS ARE THEY BLIND!!!!! I come off the couch screaming!!! I cuss so much I think the painting starts peeling the refs are so blind. Steelers catch up!....Oh boy.

OT. Great. We are in Denver, Prater's great leg and we can't win by a FG anymore, just great buy wait....what!
Tebow throw a long one! We run, run WE COULD BE GOING ALL THE WAY AND we do, we make it!!!!

This is Hart's bipolar viewing of game. Probably lost 5 lbs jumping up and down and throwing myself around on the couch rolling side to side in agony, groaning at times.

Next Sunday would take a Miracle but HEY, Tebow is a praying ;)
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
See why I say it exacerbates my bipolarism?! First quarter we had 6 f*cking yards. 6! For a whole quarter. I was cussing and screaming so much I looked down and my poor dog was in his kennel thinking I was mad at him! THANK GOD for Defense, kept them to 6, despite themselves. And their QB was hobbling along. So okay, 2nd quarter we make some up-still winable, but nothing to get excited about.

Then the 3rd quarter. HOLY SHIT! We go off our merry way-looking like most Broncos 4th quarter, okay, we got this one in the bag, their quarterback (can't spell his name) still hobbling along. Okay, I can relax

Then 4th
quarter. WHAT THE HELL?! Who gave their QB a bionic leg? Seriously, did he take a numbing pill- cause all the sudden he can move and he does and makes some plays-and we look like sh*t! Are we going throw this damn game over at the last minute. AND THE REFS ARE THEY BLIND!!!!! I come off the couch screaming!!! I cuss so much I think the painting starts peeling the refs are so blind. Steelers catch up!....Oh boy.

OT. Great. We are in Denver, Prater's great leg and we can't win by a FG anymore, just great buy wait....what!
Tebow throw a long one! We run, run WE COULD BE GOING ALL THE WAY AND we do, we make it!!!!

This is Hart's bipolar viewing of game. Probably lost 5 lbs jumping up and down and throwing myself around on the couch rolling side to side in agony, groaning at times.

Next Sunday would take a Miracle but HEY, Tebow is a praying ;)
i have an image in my mind of you wetting yourself
 

rback33

Back Again... but reformed...
Messages
4,570
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
I liked how they decided that one flag was NOT unnecessary roughness against Denver... that flag would have stayed had it been the Steelers.... we got out played though. No doubt.
 
79,560Threads
2,190,634Messages
5,006Members
Back
Top