Appellate Court Upholds Texas Abortion Law

Users who are viewing this thread

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/us-texas-abortion-idUSTRE81605220120207
The law, enacted in 2011, requires abortion providers to perform an ultrasound on pregnant women, show and describe the image to them, and play sounds of the fetal heartbeat. Though women can decline to view images or hear the heartbeat, they must listen to a description of the exam.

Even though I think humans should be recognized legally as humans upon conception, I can't support this law. If there was evidence of a need, such as women suing because of lack of knowledge, avoidable complications the doctor did not inform the mother of, or something like that, then okay. But this is clearly a Machiavellian attempt to force a kind of psychological warfare on abortion.

What say you?
 
  • 15
    Replies
  • 298
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
I agree this law seems to me to be unfair, forcing Drs to actually talk to their patients is cruel
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
What if a pro choice Dr "forgot" to have this discsussion they could probably be disciplined even though the patient did not want to hear it
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
You imply that doctors will not talk to their patients without the threat of imprisonment.
I imply that in many cases Drs dont talk directly to patients, they often talk down to them, often leave it up to an intern to "explain" things, still dont let my own bitterness cloud your own perception
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I'm waiting for someone to say it violates the constitution, thats what happens in 99% of the threads in this section.:24:
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Did you read where VA State Rep Janett Howell attached an amendment to the state abortion bill that would require men to have rectal exams and cardiac stress tests prior to being prescribed meds for erectile dysfunction? LOL http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...nd-bill-virginia-anti-abortion_n_1242627.html

IMO, it's not a good precedent for representatives to put up laws to get even. ;)

To protest a bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound before having an abortion, Virginia State Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax) on Monday attached an amendment that would require men to have a rectal exam and a cardiac stress test before obtaining a prescription for erectile dysfunction medication.
"We need some gender equity here," she told HuffPost. "The Virginia senate is about to pass a bill that will require a woman to have totally unnecessary medical procedure at their cost and inconvenience. If we're going to do that to women, why not do that to men?"
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
Yes lets guilt women who are not ready/cannot simply keep the child/or have history of illness in the family into bringing an unwanted child into an already overpopulated world. Thank you America. Your overzealous zealot is showing...
 

Panacea

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,445
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.01z
Yes lets guilt women who are not ready/cannot simply keep the child/or have history of illness in the family into bringing an unwanted child into an already overpopulated world. Thank you America. Your overzealous zealot is showing...

Frankly, this is how I feel. :clap
Certainly there are women who use abortion as birth control, but I'm not willing to sit here and say I think this sort of blackmail is ok just because of those types. Eh, it's all ugly.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm waiting for someone to say it violates the constitution, thats what happens in 99% of the threads in this section.:24:
Yeh, fuck the rule of law, right?

This is state statute, not federal. There's a difference, regardless of what Progressives would have you believe.
 

BornReady

Active Member
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This is government harassment imo. Texans who don't oppose this don't deserve the freedom their forefathers fought for.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top