Ghandi fought against a foreign powerto obtain self-rule. We already did that. Apples and oranges. But to answer your question, no he wasn't wrong. I'm pretty sure he was more than willing to pay the consequences of breaking the law, though, so he's a shining example of my point.
You're wrong, but there's no chance in hell I'm getting drawn in to this debate, with you or anyone else. Terrorists do not get placed in the same category as our military.
Ah, now we're getting there. The unjust law isn't the only one that's being broken, is it? In fact, the unjust law in this case, the one allowing late-term abortions, was not broken at all. Because this guy thought the abortion law, more accurately the act of aborting even under the law, was unjust, he broke a law that even he would agree was JUST.As you mentioned, the American Revolution, a bunch of law breakers who founded this country. Most in the U.S. would agree with that bit of law breaking.
Let me show you exactly what you said then, since you can't seem to remember.
You said "Pro-lifers are pro-LIFE correct?"
Right. He broke a law he presumably agrees with, to improve a society he presumably supports. So (1) he's nothing like Ghandi or the American revolutionairies, and (2) Pleading not guilty and trying to make some excuse would be supremely hypocritical, wouldn't it?
Yeh. I see the same irony on both sides.
Yeah, and the flip-side is that most pro-choicer's are for killing fetuses, but opposed to killing convicted serial rapists.
