AMERICA: NO 1 WAR MONGER.....

Users who are viewing this thread

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z

That, mazHur is the madness of war that Pakistan started.
There is no excuse, just the realization that the insanity your nation started could not be controlled and many innocent people of the world suffer because of Pakistan's involvement in national terrorism.
 
  • 2K
    Replies
  • 19K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
A big black burly dog ass fucks a white man and ends up in a tie....
Disgusting to note on the web that some whitey men also find getting ass fucked by black burly dogs erotic! That's an insult to humanity and against the teachings of Bible, Torah, Quran or Geeta. Shame on these licentious lecherous lepers....!!)

And yet you find watching those videos enjoyable entertainment.
Speaks volumes about your own personal morality.
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
just to clear some dust from your minds!!



Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 | Posted by Yanira Farray
Wikileaks-US’s Afghan war diary 2004-2009

Afghanistan, the War Logs
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/28/wikileaks-uss-afghan-war-diary-2004-2009/
By Asif Haroon Raja

War diary is an account of daily events occurring during war. Each HQ/unit/intelligence agency maintains this diary which subsequently helps in finalizing war history. While the unit in the field records the events based on its limited internal resources, higher HQs and intelligence agencies make their assessments based on intelligence reports, agents, intercepts, information provided by friendly intelligence agencies, source reports, electronic and print media, internet, satellite communication, etc. These reports are marked as classified and placed in folders marked as restricted, secret and top secret. Very few are authorized to handle top secret documents, stored in special lockers which can be opened using codes. Locks of the rooms in which vaults are kept are of special quality and keys kept in safe custody to over ensure that no unauthorized person gains access to classified material.

In Afghanistan , US military has been maintaining record of day to day happenings since the start of war on terror in October 2001. Since the US is up against faceless enemy fighting guerrilla war and great majority of Afghans are anti-Americans, hence human intelligence of US military is very weak. Any Afghan trying to fraternize with Americans is dubbed as an American spy and shot dead by militants. For the fear of reprisals very few among the Pashtun Afghans risk working for US intelligence agencies. For this reason, outreach of CIA and FBI in southern and eastern Afghanistan in particular is limited. The latter have therefore been banking a lot upon RAAM as well as RAW agents to complete their daily/weekly/monthly reports which they have to forward to Pentagon in Washington . As is well known, RAAM, which is filled with non-Pashtun Northern Alliance elements only, is the reincarnation of KHAD. This setup came to life in 2002 with the help of oxygen provided by RAW. Both have therefore become complimentary to each other and have been operating as a close knit team and have common objectives.

Wikileaks has gained access to 92201 US classified documents titled ‘Afghan documents 2004-2009’through an Australian Julian Assange. Out of these, it has leaked 75000 confidential documents provided by an Australian named Julian, while a little over 15000 containing sensitive information have been withheld. The report covers the period from 2004 to 2009 and is silent about the initial period from October 2001 till 2004 and six months of 2010. New York Times, Guardian and Der Spiegel were the first to leak. Wikileaks had first time revealed US military wrongdoings in Iraq .

Glancing through the leaked 75000 documents one gets an impression as if these are Pakistan specific but in actuality 37000 make some mention of Pakistan and 35000 documents are about the role of US-NATO in Afghanistan and Afghan security forces. Of 92000, 180 mention ISI and in it only 30 mention ISI disparagingly. Documents that are yet to be disclosed reportedly contain sensitive information about agents used by US intelligence agencies in Afghanistan and Pakistan as double agents with focus on Pakistan and objectives to be achieved.


Looked at your links.
Don't see how they change what is already known about Pakistan's involvement in national terrorism, mostly more conspiracy theories, unemployment comments, and reference to Wikileaks, a terrorist supporter to begin with.

Pakistan wanted a terrorist war with the US, so stop complaining, it's there.
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
You may want to give this a read maz ....Husain Haqqani former prominent PK ambassador speaks of state sponsored terrorism in PK
http://www.offtopicz.net/threads/ex-pakistani-ambassador-my-country-supports-terrorism.78064/


Ex-Pakistani Ambassador: My Country Supports Terrorism



When Pakistan's prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, visits the White House tomorrow, he may find President Barack Obama on the defensive. .....................................................................................................................................................................................

But Obama could respond to Sharif by citing another report, this one in the form a soon-to-be-released book by Pakistan's former ambassador to the U.S., Husain Haqqani, who states plainly that his government sponsors the terrorist groups whose members are often the targets of American drones.

In the book, "Magnificent Delusions," Haqqani says: "My countrymen will someday have to come to terms with global realities. Pakistan cannot become a regional leader in South Asia while it supports terrorism."

It's highly unusual to have a former ambassador -- one who spent years in Washington defending his government against all sorts of accusations (Haqqani served in the U.S. from 2008 to 2011, a period in which Osama bin Laden was killed while hiding in Pakistan) -- plainly admit the truth: that his government, through its army and intelligence agencies, aids and abets the murder of civilians by terrorist organizations.

U.S. officials (and officials of numerous foreign intelligence agencies) have long believed that Pakistani intelligence provides material support to terrorist groups, but Haqqani may be the most prominent Pakistani to publicly agree with them.

Haqqani, though, has long been a rare sort of Pakistani public figure. He is a long-time critic of the country's military, which is the real power behind the civilians who nominally rule, and his tenure as ambassador ended when his enemies accused him of plotting against the armed forces. He now lives in a semi-self-imposed exile in the U.S.

Pakistan and the U.S., which have had a contentious relationship for decades (the history of this relationship is the main subject of Haqqani's new book), have lately tried to smooth over their differences. Secretary of State John Kerry, in particular, seems keen to reinforce the view that Pakistan is an invaluable ally, and the U.S. recently decided to release about $1.6 billion in aid that was suspended in the difficult days after bin Laden's killing.

But it certainly would be useful for the Obama administration to press Sharif hard on his country's support for several terrorist groups, including those behind the killings of American soldiers in Afghanistan and the Mumbai massacre of 2008. The group backing that slaughter, Lashkar-e-Taiba, continues to openly operate in Pakistan. Its founder, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, has a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head, but this doesn't stop him from ranging freely and speaking publicly.

The support given to Lashkar-e-Taiba by the Pakistani intelligence agency -- the Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI -- serves as a case study for Haqqani. After the Mumbai massacre, Haqqani writes, Pakistan "initially denied any connection to the attack. Instead of trying to identify and punish terrorists, Pakistan focused on refuting reports of Pakistani complicity."

He says that the attack, which came in the final months of George W. Bush's presidency, lost Pakistan whatever official sympathy it previously had in Washington. No matter: Washington soon forgets, and Pakistan's military leaders can safely assume that they will pay no long-term price for supporting terrorism, Haqqani writes.

Soon after the bin Laden raid, the U.S. made an effort to test Pakistan's willingness to combat terrorism. Haqqani writes that two senior American officials visited Islamabad to propose a series of steps Pakistan could take to build confidence. They provided Pakistan with information about a bomb-making factory run by the Haqqani Network. (The Haqqanis of the Haqqani Network, a terrorist group, are not related to Husain Haqqani.)

Pakistan's military leaders "promised that the Pakistan army would send in troops to shut down the illicit factory that was manufacturing the IEDs," Haqqani writes. "A few days later the CIA sent time-stamped photographs showing the facility being dismantled hours before the army's arrival. The dismantling began after a man on a motorcycle went into the factory, thus leading to speculation that he had come to tip off the terrorists about the impending army operation."

He goes on, "The Americans concluded that Pakistan's failure to combat terrorism went beyond its law enforcement agencies' and armed forces' incompetence."

The Pakistani government's pattern in these matters is so predictable that Haqqani, in a telephone interview with me, called it the "Groundhog Day approach."

"Every time the U.S. makes a reasonable request that would prove Pakistan's bona fides in fighting terrorism, our response was to raise the temperature of anti-American sentiment through the media, to provoke hostility," he told me. "The American folly is that they always think the Pakistani government is going to respond reasonably."

Until Lashkar-e-Taiba is shut down, and until its leader is in prison, there is no reason to believe that Pakistan is willing to turn a new page in its relations with the U.S., or anyone else.


http://www.bloombergview.com/


Interesting.
Good find.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Looked at your links.
Don't see how they change what is already known about Pakistan's involvement in national terrorism, mostly more conspiracy theories, unemployment comments, and reference to Wikileaks, a terrorist supporter to begin with.

Pakistan wanted a terrorist war with the US, so stop complaining, it's there.


I didn't write those pdf's...they are in the public domain and shouldn't upset you, little imp!!
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
That, mazHur is the madness of war that Pakistan started.
There is no excuse, just the realization that the insanity your nation started could not be controlled and many innocent people of the world suffer because of Pakistan's involvement in national terrorism.

You should be ashamed of blaming your front line ally, Pakistan. First you blame Al Quaida, then Taliban and now Pak .....are you in your mind??
Ask your politicians and think tanks about what's wrong , actually wrong which buggers you. You ought to see a shrink before you shrink in the box!
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Click on the front page of OTZ.
Look in the upper right hand corner to see who is logged in and what do you see?
At the moment, 10 'robots' logged on.
Any one of those 'robots' could be searching against trigger words and compiling lists of screen names.
NSA, Homeland Security, CIA or even FBI could possibly have your identity on a terrorist watch list or even an undesirable list of perverts that limits entrance into the US......and no doubt shares that data with neighbors like Canada or even European nations.
Enjoy your next trip through airport security, mazHur Butt, the bitchy whining, terrorist loving, racist pervert :D


Take care of your own arse....
I am a friend of America and that's all which perturbs you and none else.
Go swimming, you little tadpole!!
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
Hussain Haqqani is facing trial in Pak for treason and he's absconding, given quarter by the US.

Pretty easy to see why the Pk government was upset with him:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memogate_(Pakistan)

The memogate controversy (also Mullen memo controversy)[1] revolves around a memorandum (addressed to Admiral Mike Mullen) ostensibly seeking help of the Obama administration in the wake of the Osama bin Laden raid to avert a military takeover of the civilian government in Pakistan, as well as assisting in a Washington insider takeover of the government and military apparatus. The timeline of events indicate that the memo, delivered in May, was still being acted on behind the scenes in October 2011; when Mansoor Ijaz wrote a Financial Times article bringing initial public attention to the affair. The memo, which at first was questioned to even exist, was published in November, leading to the resignation of Ambassador Haqqani and the continuing Pakistani Supreme Court investigation.[2][3][4]

Central actors in the plot include Pakistani-American businessman Mansoor Ijaz, who alleged that long-time friend and former Pakistan Ambassador to the United States Husain Haqqani asked him to deliver a confidential memo[5] asking for US assistance. The memo is alleged to have been drafted by Haqqani at the behest of President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari.[6] The memo was delivered to Mike Mullen by personal friend of Mansoor Ijaz and then National Security Advisor James L. Jones.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has opened a broader inquiry into the origins, credibility and purpose of the memo and as of March 30, 2012 has extended their inquiry at least another 6 weeks.[2][7] On April 19, 2012 a petition was submitted in the Supreme Court to arrest former Pakistan ambassador to US Husain Haqqani through Interpol for his refusal to return to Pakistan. On June 12 the supreme court commission released its findings and found that after testimony by all parties and verifying the forensic results of Ijaz's BlackBerry conversations with Haqqani it was "incontrovertibly established" that Husain Haqqani had written the memo and was being called back to Pakistan to face likely charges of treason.

Haggani was concerned about the terrorist controls still in place in the Pk government and military.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memogate_(Pakistan)#Contents_of_the_memo
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
I didn't write those pdf's...they are in the public domain and shouldn't upset you, little imp!!

Of course you didn't write those PDFs.
That's irrelevant to their value.
The author's articles can only be taken as personal opinions
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
You should be ashamed of blaming your front line ally, Pakistan. First you blame Al Quaida, then Taliban and now Pak .....are you in your mind??
Ask your politicians and think tanks about what's wrong , actually wrong which buggers you. You ought to see a shrink before you shrink in the box!

I have no shame for what you support nor those that do your bidding.
Those acts of terrorism are on you and your nation.
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
Are you sure you posted the right picture??
Or, is it this?

250098-pervezmusharrafafp-1315755692-707-640x480.jpg

It was your link to a Google image search and that image was there.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top