Aerial wolf hunting?

[Goat Whisperer]

Yes...They are and the Gray Wolf is MUCH more aggressive. Hell coyotes are small, trust me...I've killed them.

So you've been volunteering at the Zoo since you were 11?

Yep, since the end of the 6th grade. A few months before I turned 12, they let me in early because I was close to turning 12, since then they have changed it so you have to be 14. This is my 5th year, I haven't volunteered for 5 years yet.

 

[BadBoy@TheWheel]

I said that wolves that are healthy (not desperate for food, sick and dying, HEALTHY) have never killed a person in North America. I didn't say they haven't attacked a person, or killed someone out of desperation, as I don't know if they have.

And exactly why does it matter under what pretense someone gets killed by a wolf?


"Eh he wasn't a bad wolf...He had a toothache....So he ate that guy"

 

[Goat Whisperer]

You really can't say population control and humane in the same sentence. Frankly I could care less, no they do not need to be hunted into extinction, but they need to be controlled.

I think every animal should be killed/treated as humanely as possible. I raise animals for slaughter, but the animals are always treated well by me. I don't mean they should alwyas be treated what many people call humanely, they should just be treated as humanely as possible.

 

[Goat Whisperer]

And exactly why does it matter under what pretense someone gets killed by a wolf?


"Eh he wasn't a bad wolf...He had a toothache....So he ate that guy"

If a wolf is healthy it doesn't go after humans. So we should keep wolves healthy by controlling them correctly, and definitely shooting the sickly ones over the big healthy ones that look better on your wall.

Yes, the pretense does matter, be cause most wolves are healthy. Do we blame people that were completely mentally unstable, desperate, and insane for murdering someone? Not really. If they had been thinking clearly they never would have. Yes a person is dead, but the person who did it shouldn't be sent to prison for killing them, because they weren't really control over themselves.

Wolves don't lie about being sick or desperate.

 

[BadBoy@TheWheel]

If a wolf is healthy it doesn't go after humans. So we should keep wolves healthy by controlling them correctly, and definitely shooting the sickly ones over the big healthy ones that look better on your wall.

Yes, the pretense does matter, be cause most wolves are healthy. Do we blame people that were completely mentally unstable, desperate, and insane for murdering someone? Not really. If they had been thinking clearly they never would have. Yes a person is dead, but the person who did it shouldn't be sent to prison for killing them, because they weren't really control over themselves.

Wolves don't lie about being sick or desperate.

Get it through you young mind. Animals are different than people. There's a reson we're at the top of the food chain Bri.

Or you could call Johnny Cochrane to defend the wolves...Oh wait....He dead

 

[dt3]

Or you could call Johnny Cochrane to defend the wolves...Oh wait....He dead

The wolves got Johnny! :eek

 

[ssl]

bb - you were stating what i was, just with a lot more words (and experience).

killing is killing, nature is nature, we are humans, they are animals, humane should be reserved for humans, not for animals, et cetera.

but really, as i reread this...

we are destroying what is defined as nature.

if we let nature run her course, then it should be that if we encroach on their territory, they should have the right to retaliate, as we are running into their space.

another thought, and most people do not like to think of it:

what gives us the right to control animal populations if we cannot control our own?

 

[wednesday]

Like it or not, if we choose to live in areas that we must share with wildlife, we do need to maintain control over the population. Any real hunter (not a poacher) will tell you that if you don't regulate the population of animals, they will die out anyways, they will literally eat themselves into famine.

What a shame we can't use this same method of control in humans!!!

*shrugs*

 

[ssl]

What a shame we can't use this same method of control in humans!!!

*shrugs*

bb - you were stating what i was, just with a lot more words (and experience).

killing is killing, nature is nature, we are humans, they are animals, humane should be reserved for humans, not for animals, et cetera.

but really, as i reread this...

we are destroying what is defined as nature.

if we let nature run her course, then it should be that if we encroach on their territory, they should have the right to retaliate, as we are running into their space.

another thought, and most people do not like to think of it:

what gives us the right to control animal populations if we cannot control our own?

seriously.

 

[Guyzerr]

Have you ever actually BEEN to Alaska? It's no walk in the park, and it's the most sparse state in the country. You have any idea how far you might have to hike to kill one wolf?

Lived in the bush in Northern B.C. from spring until fall way back when. It would have been about the same so I'm thinking that counts. ( Check your map ) Moose and such. One even came after the inflatable raft I was on once. Scared the shit out of me, seeing that big rack coming after me. Damn did I row fast. Oh ya, there was a grizzly bear that destroyed the camp next to ours which btw were tents. I never seen such carnage created by wildlife before. Good thing we were in town that day.

The purpose is to accomplish as much as you can with the time period.

Um..... that's basically what I said.