U.S. House approves $636 billion military spending bill - Yahoo! Canada News
the same politicians who bitched and whined about all the money spent on iraq and afghanistan during the elections just approved this.
how awesome is that? and you fucking suckers eat the bullshit they spoon feed you about opposing the wars and not wanting to fund this and that and they almost unanimously voted to approve of this budget. you people are idiots.
and here's the kicker!!!
you people voted for this. change we can believe in! what a joke.
this article is chock FULL of asinine buffoonery from the feds...
holy shit...
now this is good but then we read this next...
WTF? they eliminate one thing but kept two, which the pentagon didnt want and isnt going to press the issue on? this means money will be wasted. AWESOME! after all its not really their money so why should they give a fuck, right?
the same politicians who bitched and whined about all the money spent on iraq and afghanistan during the elections just approved this.
how awesome is that? and you fucking suckers eat the bullshit they spoon feed you about opposing the wars and not wanting to fund this and that and they almost unanimously voted to approve of this budget. you people are idiots.
and here's the kicker!!!
more awesomeness.But the $124 billion approved for ongoing wars probably will not be enough to cover President Barack Obama's plans to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan.
you people voted for this. change we can believe in! what a joke.
this article is chock FULL of asinine buffoonery from the feds...
The bill includes 1,720 earmarks costing $4.2 billion for lawmakers' pet projects, according to the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.
holy shit...
The spending bill represents a partial victory for Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who had sought to eliminate unwanted weapons programs over the objections of lawmakers who represent areas where they are manufactured.
now this is good but then we read this next...
Congress eliminated funding for Lockheed-Martin Corp's F-22 fighter jet, but provided 10 more Boeing Co C-17 transport planes than the Pentagon asked for, at a cost of $2.5 billion.
The Pentagon keeps alive two programs the Pentagon did not seek to fund: the troubled VH-71 presidential helicopter program and an alternate engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, made by General Electric Co and Britain's Rolls-Royce Group Plc.
The Pentagon said it would not recommend a veto despite the unwanted measures.
WTF? they eliminate one thing but kept two, which the pentagon didnt want and isnt going to press the issue on? this means money will be wasted. AWESOME! after all its not really their money so why should they give a fuck, right?
Last edited by a moderator: