Oh the irony. I'm an asshole for simply pointing out that the source of your information is totally lacking in credibility.
I've also pointed out that other sources are giving balanced information with properly documented scientific argument both for and against the proposition, supported by experts and scholars.
I'm going to have fun dismantling this bimbo's arguments one by one.
1. It was designed to profit off of you, not make you healthy.
Correct!
Well, who would have thought that all of that infrastructure and processing equipment would have been built for charitable purposes? Nobody, it's capitalism101. Except maybe to hippies. Nobody grows food with the sole intention of magically 'making you healthy'. Not even the poseurs in the organics industry.Ever noticed how much more organic food costs?That's because the organic food industry wants profit, just the same as anyone else. Try living on
nothing but organic squash...it will make you unhealthy, unless consumed as part of a balanced diet.
It all started with a flawed theory by a really bad scientist who said that saturated fat and cholesterol cause heart disease Is this a structured argument? Does your writer not know how to include facts to back up her story, or is she more experienced in writing elementary school essays?
2. It’s got a mystery ingredient they’re not telling you about.
The 'mystery' ingredient is milk.Seriously.
3. It contains antibiotics, nasty bodily fluids, and GMOs
The first sentence of this paragraph makes little sense.
Water downstream of a factory farm in Idaho, where animals are generally knee-deep in their own waste.
That's because in Dana's haste co cut/paste and spew all of this nonsense, he left the photo out. to the trained eye, the photo is of a settling pond, where waste water is treated before being dischared. Oddly enough, there's no photographic evidence of animals knee deep in their own waste - More dramatic hippy nonsense.
The next bit - somehow changing from grass to grain necessitates pumping cows full of antibiotics? Guess what....we feed our cows 100% grass, and they still need antibiotics. This woman really needs to go back and learn the facts instead of making shit up. Pretty much every farm animal needs antibiotics care at some stage, as do humans. Antibiotics exist to stop us from dying of minor ailments.
The FDA allows up to 750 million pus cells per liter of milk, to be sold legally.
Lovely line this. I'd love to see where it is written in FDA regulations, but I doubt that they refer to 'pus'. It will most likely be impurities,largely consisting of other organic matter.Technically it
could include pus,so let's pretend that the whole impurity content is pus because it sounds so much nastier. Lets also be sure not to highlight the term 'up to'. 750 million in
bold lettering looks much
more convincing. Also the omission of any reference to pasteurisation as listed in the FDA requirements would allow the gullible to believe that they're being sold bottles of toxic substance.
4. It’s provides almost no nutritional value.
LOL again, no data to back this line up.Here's some that says this silly woman needs to go back to school.
| |
| |
Optimum health: | |
| |
Weight gain: | |
The good: This food is low in Saturated Fat and Cholesterol. It is also a good source of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Potassium, and a very good source of Protein, Vitamin D, Riboflavin, Calcium and Phosphorus.
The bad: A large portion of the calories in this food come from sugars.
Caloric Ratio Pyramid
9
-55
mildly inflammatory
Read Morehttp://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/dairy-and-egg-products/78/2#ixzz268xF4c8I
see the link? it's called 'source'. There's no source data in the hippie's article.
5. It won’t make or keep you skinny.
well duh. even drinking water will not 'make you skinny'. You have to reduce calorie consumption, and exercise, to achieve that.
6. It won’t help you avoid heart disease
Again, no source references to this paragraph, which appears to be written like a children's storybook.
Let's see what the
experts
say shall we? I'll even go to a neutral source for you.
It is recommended that for Australians over 2 years old, reduced-fat varieties of dairy foods (including milk) should be chosen where possible, in the Australian Dietary Guidelines.
Where does this pearl of wisdom come from?Some bored housewife's blog? nope.....
http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/healthy-eating/food-and-nutrition-facts/Pages/dairy.aspx
Dana, face it mate. This whole pile of crap is a beat-up, designed to appeal to the vanity of those who consider themselves too special for mainstream products. Like every other food product dairy can be bad for you if not used as part of a balanced diet, but that's no reason to start a witch hunt, and a very poorly written witch hunt at that.
I look forward to your next cut paste fiasco.