3-D why?
- Thread starter AUFred
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
-
33Replies
-
1KViews
-
0Participant count
-
Participants list
omg that use to be my FAVORITE movie!!
Minor Axis
Well-Known Member
Last time I went to the IMax they were advertising a space station film (as in the real space station). Although I'm not a fan of 3D in most movies, watching this preview in 3D, it really popped, like you were there. Something tells me it is not going away although I really do resent having to pay a 3D price that they claim is for glasses, but if you bring your own glasses, you still have to pay the surcharge. However, at the IMAX they made you give the glasses back...
Like the panorama of Amon Goeth (played by Ralph Fiennes) standing on his balcony making head shots way across the camp...
I found some interesting reading on Goeth here[/url].
Last edited by a moderator:
To me IMAX is not like 3-d in the theater. IMAX is an awesome experience.
This may only be my complaint but here goes. Seems like hollywood is really into making 3-D movies all of a sudden. First, I don't like wearing the goofy glasses for two + hours. I always leave the theater with a headache. Second, An extra $3 or $3.50 per ticket in this economy really sucks. Thirdly, I don't see it really enhancing my viewing experience.:surrender
:homo:
I never liked them, it's stupid and doesn't make the movie better for me at all.
Minor Axis
Well-Known Member
We recently watched Avatar at home and it was just as good an experience as the 3D version.
I watched it at home, was awesome.
I can't handle 3D because it hurts my eyes (double astigmatism) and it makes the movie look too honky and silly.
Minor Axis
Well-Known Member
Why I hate 3D (and you should too) by Roger Ebert.
1. It's a waste of dimension.
2. It adds nothing to the experience.
3. It can be a distraction.
4. It can create nausea and headaches.
5. 3D is relatively dark (dim) as compared to a traditional movie.
6. There is money to be made selling digital projectors.
7. 3D surcharges run $3.50-$7.00.
8. It does not help a traditional non-cgi drama.
10. Whenever Hollywood feels threatened it turns to technology.
I agree that when you see a regular 2D film, your eyes turn it into 3D. 3D technology is just an amplification of that process, but it is distorted.
1. It's a waste of dimension.
2. It adds nothing to the experience.
3. It can be a distraction.
4. It can create nausea and headaches.
5. 3D is relatively dark (dim) as compared to a traditional movie.
6. There is money to be made selling digital projectors.
7. 3D surcharges run $3.50-$7.00.
8. It does not help a traditional non-cgi drama.
10. Whenever Hollywood feels threatened it turns to technology.
I agree that when you see a regular 2D film, your eyes turn it into 3D. 3D technology is just an amplification of that process, but it is distorted.
i just saw shrek 3 in 3D, did not like it
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members