Not true, not true. The bird is exactly the same size in both shots.i see that it can make birds bigger.....
Not true, not true. The bird is exactly the same size in both shots.![]()
No I never forgot. I posted the comparison for the not so experienced ones. I take folks like you, sky, Janie O'babe etc. are already aware of it.You forgot to equate in the crop factor of x1.6![]()
:24::24::24:no i never forgot. I posted the comparison for the not so experienced ones. I take folks like you, sky, janie o'babe etc. Are already aware of it. :d
Why complicate things I always said.:24::24::24:
The one I bought was only $1199.00 and Canon's measly 100 - 400 is $1820.00 and that's a sale price. I owned canon's 100 - 400 and to be frank I can't see any difference in the output as far as quality is concerned. Matter of fact I think Sigma's IS is a heck of a lot better.what's the price difference in lenses....?
I just want to get the full perspective
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.