I think love is learned and is comprised of many different elements.
Okay, so that explains Something....I guess...
I think love is learned and is comprised of many different elements.
An atheist can still maintain the possibility, that isn't counter to the atheist argument at all. Atheism is simply the absence of belief. Agnosticism is the idea that the notion of God is unknowable. Prof. Dawkins, for example, has said that yes, there is indeed a possibility. And he's probably the world's most famous atheist.
If you believe 100% that God doesn't exist you're just as bad as someone that believes 100% that He does.
I think that's a reasonable and honest answer. I definitely believe in God, but, I don't think it's absolutely provable. The same for an Atheist. They may believe in no God, but, still, not provable.
If you believe 100% that God doesn't exist you're just as bad as someone that believes 100% that He does.
You can't, some are diametrically opposed to each other.
would you like to explore that question with me sometime in a hot tub on the veranda of a beach house in barbados?Is Love important? If it is, then where did you come up with this information? Is it an instinct, or did you learn it somewhere?![]()
At what percentage do you believe in:
Fire breathing dragons?
Unicorns?
Fairies?
Zeus?
Centaur?
Pegasus?
Cyclops?
Gremlin?
Elf?
Kraken?
Sandman?
Tooth Fairy?
Santa?
:dunno
So if you believe that any of these did not exist 100%, does that make you just as bad as someone who does believe in them 100%
When it comes down to the nut cutting, isn't it about faith in a higher power?
I think people make believing too damned hard! Rules. Rules. Rules. Tradition this. Gotta do that. I call BS. What's to lose in having faith? Nothing. What's to lose if not having faith and in the end, it's all true? Everything. Kinda simple, no?
Not really.
The only way a baptist is getting to heaven is by asking Jesus into his heart (once saved always saved)
a muslim must dedicate his life to allah and do good works in his name
a catholic has a list of things that must happen
Jehovah witnesses are shit out of luck since there are only 144,000 people going to heaven and they are all filled up
and the list goes on and on...
So if someone could prove to you without a doubt that there was a god, it wouldn't bother you in the least not knowing who has it right? I mean what if the baptists have it right and you need to ask jesus to come into your heart to be saved. It doesn't matter if you are good and love god, you will still burn in hell. Baptists believe that all Catholics are going to hell... And Catholics believe that baptists are....
It wouldn't even give you pause that you might be worshiping him incorrectly?
that's a truly terrible argument. We know most of those do not exist because they fly in the face of any rational view of the universe. There are, however, spaces beyond the universe we're slowly becoming aware of that leaves the possibility of a creator somewhere. I'm not talking about anything to do with organised religion here, by the way.
There are no spaces in the natural world for anything on your list.
Peter is gonna come along and wallop us for hijacking yet another thread.![]()
Tim, Tim, Tim. See... all of that stuff you just typed out? They're all rules. They're traditions set forth by sub rules. If everyone would just stick to the basics... and I mean the smallest of basics... FAITH.
You have faith that your wife won't cheat on you.
You have faith that your children will love you when they're grown.
You have faith that every religion is mixed up.
You have faith that noone knows the truth.
So, faith is just that. FAITH. No matter which color you choose to paint it... it's still faith.
It's not hijacking, it's evolution and natural selection that you witnessing.![]()
Which is also Faith.![]()
That's fine if that's the way it works out...
But the God of Abraham laid out exactly what you must do in order to be saved. And if it turns out that this proven God is that God, then you are up shits creek if you think faith is going to get you anywhere.
That's my point.
The argument is exactly correct... you can't see it that way, but it is.
When you say that their is room for a creator (not religion) because of the unknown... you are leaning on religion.
The notion of a creator did not come from science, it came from religion, our own imaginations. I don't care how much you want to remove religion from this argument, you can't. The very idea of a creator or god came from our ignorance of the unknown over tens of thousands of years.
Just ask yourself where the idea of a creator come from.
No dear, that would under the heading of science.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.