A fair question.
Who Should We Invade Next?
- Thread starter Peter Parka
- Start date
No one?
Canada! Just in case.... :unsure:
Lets Invade Antarctica.
And create terrorists out of emperor penguins? what are you thinking?
*penguins
oh pete you are funny :24::24::24:
thank goodness we can all laugh at international policy:24::24::24:
oh shit me bag is getting soggy
thank goodness we can all laugh at international policy:24::24::24:
oh shit me bag is getting soggy
Let me give you a refill! I didn't know you needed a colostomy bag!:24:
Honestly, I said no one...no need to put the lives of our soldiers, sailors and marines on the line just because some camel jockey starts sabre-rattling....
Darfur.
But they have no oil...
Hitler was just "sabre-rattling" too.
Lets Invade ourselves 
. That'll show us who's boss.
. That'll show us who's boss.
Why is France not on your list Pete????
Remember Agincourt!!!!!:nod:
Remember Agincourt!!!!!:nod:
Yeah. Just starving women and children being massacred.
They had that in Iraq too but everybody is mad about that little operation. It seems if people are starving, being massacred AND have oil then it's imperialistic aggression and a violation of international law to invade. I guess that oil makes their lives a little less worthwhile to care about.
not even close..
Iraq HAD a massacre a long time ago. Darfur is happening right now. But I'm not against your notion of oil influencing foreign policies.
Resources influence everything. Why else you think nothing has been done about N. Korea which is probably the worst pit in the world as far as atrocities and oppression go?
To be honest I'm surprised the US even bothered to invade Iraq. It seems it would have been cheaper just to strong arm Saddam to sell the oil for cheap.
Unless of course they really thought he had big firecrackers hiding under his bed.