The Big Bang

dt3 said:
How can it be a cosmological constant if it's changing?
Click to expand...

It doesn't change. The universe expand at a constant rate, correct?

dt3 said:
And for the balloon points, how do they escape away from an infinite amount of gravity?
Click to expand...

I don't understand where you're getting infinite gravity?


dt3 said:
M-Theory is just that, a theory. Where did the higher dimensional universe come from?
Click to expand...

The singularity (big bang), 10-11 dimensions broke up into our 3d world and whatever other dimensions we can theorize but not prove
 
Mayo said:
It doesn't change. The universe expand at a constant rate, correct?



I don't understand where you're getting infinite gravity?




The singularity (big bang), 10-11 dimensions broke up into our 3d world and whatever other dimensions we can theorize but not prove
Click to expand...
I heard on the radio that the speed was increasing (which is why I started the thread ;) )

I say infinite gravity, because if everything in our Universe was in one tiny singularity point, the gravitational pull of that point would be massive.
 
There are big flaws in concepts such M-Theory, string/superstring thoery, theoretical particle physics. The problem is at these 'constants' and the 'facts' are forever changing. This is a cutting edge field where people are proven wrong all of the time. A good example is black holes and baby universes by Hawking, almost all of what he wrote is now been 'proven' 'wrong'. For anyone in this field to say that someone is 'wrong' is pointless... Take Quantum Mechanics, a generalisation of of lots of ideas into one big generalisation... it's all in the air baby, all in the air.

On the big bang front, Hot states, particle matter theories, dark matter these are all theories... You could read for hours and never come anywhere closer to understanding what is really going on.

My suggestion, take up golf...
 
Sparkey Duck said:
There are big flaws in concepts such M-Theory, string/superstring thoery, theoretical particle physics. The problem is at these 'constants' and the 'facts' are forever changing. This is a cutting edge field where people are proven wrong all of the time. A good example is black holes and baby universes by Hawking, almost all of what he wrote is now been 'proven' 'wrong'. For anyone in this field to say that someone is 'wrong' is pointless... Take Quantum Mechanics, a generalisation of of lots of ideas into one big generalisation... it's all in the air baby, all in the air.

On the big bang front, Hot states, particle matter theories, dark matter these are all theories... You could read for hours and never come anywhere closer to understanding what is really going on.

My suggestion, take up golf...
Click to expand...

Ohhhhhhh..... I'm going to like this guy. :D

Heads up Evan... smart guy comming online!!
 
Yeah, Spark well put :)

And Donnie, this has all been discussed before. String, Super String, Big Bang. We have about wore it down to the nub.

Theoretical physicists are just getting close to proving ONE of Einstein's theories or dis-provig it, who knows. I really do not see how you can make a very compelling argument well fought enough to prove/dis-prove any of it.

Hell I made a post with a video about Plasma Theory, now the EE's are getting in on the fun...lol

I do believe Big Bang has merit, I'm just not sure if they ever actualy untangle it it will still be called that.

I call it "That huge expansion like a long time ago dude":p
 
Back
Top