GraceAbounds
Well-Known Member
Are you frustrated about who to vote for?
I AM!
I do not agree with the Republican candidates on many social service & environmental issues and I don't agree with the Democratic candidates on many of the moral and military issues.
It is honestly so frustrating to me! All of these issues are important and I don't like having to decide which issues I am going to have to just do without so to speak.
Prioritizing them are difficult.
So far Hillary, Huckabee, Hunter, and McCain are my top choices based on the issues and me being 60% or more agreeable with them. And Hunter won't make it, he may even be out already - I don't know. And I can't see myself ever voting for Hillary as I don't trust her. So it looks like it will be either Huckabee or McCain for me. But I am not happy with that vote either, because there are certain issues that I feel strongly about changing here at home. Ugh!!!!!!!
People that I definitely will not be voting for because I don't agree with them on over 1/2 of the issues are Kucinich, Obama, Biden (I'm pretty sure he is out of the race), Guliani, Brownback (I think he is out of the race), Gravel, or Cox.
This is all really irritating. Has anyone else really thought about how they personally feel on the issues, prioritized the issues and then researched the candidates? Are you feeling frustrated as well?
This is not a debate thread. I am just wondering where other Americans are in the process of going through the issues and the candidates. Are you going to go for party? For the person? Or for the Issues?
As one can tell, I go with the issues first, and then if that is tied I go with the reliability and character of the person to break the tie. I have this problem every election because my political party is not a major party. I'm a Centrist and in the state of AZ there are not even enough of us to be listed as an independent party. :smiley24:
Anywho? What says you?
I AM!
I do not agree with the Republican candidates on many social service & environmental issues and I don't agree with the Democratic candidates on many of the moral and military issues.
It is honestly so frustrating to me! All of these issues are important and I don't like having to decide which issues I am going to have to just do without so to speak.
So far Hillary, Huckabee, Hunter, and McCain are my top choices based on the issues and me being 60% or more agreeable with them. And Hunter won't make it, he may even be out already - I don't know. And I can't see myself ever voting for Hillary as I don't trust her. So it looks like it will be either Huckabee or McCain for me. But I am not happy with that vote either, because there are certain issues that I feel strongly about changing here at home. Ugh!!!!!!!
People that I definitely will not be voting for because I don't agree with them on over 1/2 of the issues are Kucinich, Obama, Biden (I'm pretty sure he is out of the race), Guliani, Brownback (I think he is out of the race), Gravel, or Cox.
This is all really irritating. Has anyone else really thought about how they personally feel on the issues, prioritized the issues and then researched the candidates? Are you feeling frustrated as well?
This is not a debate thread. I am just wondering where other Americans are in the process of going through the issues and the candidates. Are you going to go for party? For the person? Or for the Issues?
As one can tell, I go with the issues first, and then if that is tied I go with the reliability and character of the person to break the tie. I have this problem every election because my political party is not a major party. I'm a Centrist and in the state of AZ there are not even enough of us to be listed as an independent party. :smiley24:
Anywho? What says you?