2008 Dodge Avenger

Users who are viewing this thread

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I want one, I want one!!!

Dodge figures the full-size Charger's styling will work just as well on a mid-size car. And so we have the Avenger, which basically looks like a three-quarter-scale Charger.

Mechanically, the Avenger is a twin to the Chrysler Sebring sedan, sharing its underpinnings and powertrains. And like the Sebring, the Avenger hopes to out-value the Honda Accord, the Nissan Altima, and the Ford Fusion. To that end, the Avenger starts at$18,895--$1605 less than an outgoing Stratus but with $985 more content.


The Avenger's cabin is spacious enough for two six-foot, two-inch occupants to sit one behind the other in comfort. Perceived quality is a big step up from other recent Chrysler efforts, and the unique dashboard architecture is characterful. Other neat cabin touches include the Chill Zone (a beverage cooler mounted in the dash) and MyGig (an optional audio, navigation, and entertainment system that allows you to download music and photos to a hard drive).


The driving experience is not nearly so cool. The 2.4-liter four moves the beast along reasonably well, but those expecting a performance hit from the V-6-powered R/T (man, does that badge set up expectations, or what?) will be disappointed. At least the six-speed automatic is smooth and fast-reacting, especially in manual mode.


Eventually, there will be an Avenger SRT, but Dodge hasn't decided yet whether it will use a blown version of the 3.5-liter V-6 or a higher-displacement V-6. It'll almost certainly be all-wheel drive, an option that arrives by July for R/T models.


This new Avenger won't be rewriting any rules for the mid-size class. At best, it's an alternative with a uniquely American accent.


















det2_avenger_2.jpg
 
  • 16
    Replies
  • 977
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

lemon

Member
Messages
7,916
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
oh, and not to mention, its ugly. never ever take styling from your small-size truck (dakota) and apply it to a small tank. makes it ugly.

oh, and not to mention. dont fucking jack the car up to the point where the rim is halfway under the car...
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
oh, and not to mention, its ugly. never ever take styling from your small-size truck (dakota) and apply it to a small tank. makes it ugly.

oh, and not to mention. dont fucking jack the car up to the point where the rim is halfway under the car...

You just completely made a contradiction on yourself. Jacking up the car would not make the wheels go under the car. Think that one through =] Besides, that's just one picture, the other's look like a smaller version of the new Chargers. Very stylish.


you can't afford gas let alone a new car.:jk

I can! $20 gets me a full tank. Granted, it's a four-wheeler :tongue:
 

lemon

Member
Messages
7,916
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
You just completely made a contradiction on yourself. Jacking up the car would not make the wheels go under the car. Think that one through =] Besides, that's just one picture, the other's look like a smaller version of the new Chargers. Very stylish.

my dear sniper...

you fail to see things in more than one perspective. literally. one has 3 views, in this current world, if we just play with the sense of sight. the top/bottom views show the wheels under the car. the left/right view shows the wheels under the car. the front/back views show the wheels under the car.


tell me where my contradiction is..

when you can plainly see the middle of the wheel/rim (where the axle connects to the wheel) is colinear with the rocker panels of the car. only trucks do that, because well, they need to, if used as a truck. if not, well, they are dropped. or jacked higher. depending on driver.



i did not contradict myself. the wheels, in general, are below the car. the views of the car confirm such, so therefore, i am right. and if i am right in that respect, then i am right when i say it is ugly. q.e.d.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Middleburg is like, fucking redneck capital. Perfect to use four-wheelers. Hell, $20 buys me more than a tank, it buys almost 3 full tanks. That's awesome.

oh, and not to mention, its ugly. never ever take styling from your small-size truck (dakota) and apply it to a small tank. makes it ugly.

oh, and not to mention. dont fucking jack the car up to the point where the rim is halfway under the car...

Jacking the car up would make the body higher, and the rims would be lower than the car. Lowering the car would make the rims disappear under the car.

See my point?
 

OUZBnd

Active Member
Messages
2,807
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.06z
I liked it until I saw the last picture where it looked like it had a lift kit installed, and smashed in the rear end.
 

lemon

Member
Messages
7,916
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
Middleburg is like, fucking redneck capital. Perfect to use four-wheelers. Hell, $20 buys me more than a tank, it buys almost 3 full tanks. That's awesome.



Jacking the car up would make the body higher, and the rims would be lower than the car. Lowering the car would make the rims disappear under the car.

See my point?

point seen, not understood. :D

still, its ugly. dodge should have stopped at the caliber.
 

lemon

Member
Messages
7,916
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
actually, i was on another forum, and apparently dodge likes lining up the axles with the bottom of the cars..

eh, i guess its not my cup of tea.
 
79,511Threads
2,190,303Messages
5,003Members
Back
Top