I see it as a violation of our rights and a complete waste of resources/money.
Whilst I agree with the anti stuff, Wikipedia could have done a better job.
Disable Javascript in your browser and it will work just fine.
That's their intentionI had a look at the longer page of information they give and they advise people to do exactly that (or some other option for getting past it). They don't want to restrict access as much as they want everyone who goes to wikipedia to see their message.
That's their intentionI had a look at the longer page of information they give and they advise people to do exactly that (or some other option for getting past it). They don't want to restrict access as much as they want everyone who goes to wikipedia to see their message.
Terrible.You bet it is.. Any country that has extradition agreement with the US will be a target for this new law..
figures it was the repubican'ts.Is this coming from the right or is it bypartisan? I know the House Bill SOPA was introduced by a Republican.
PIPA Video
What You Need To Know @ CBS News.
Exactly what sites are temporarily shut down?
Here is what I'm seeing:
Craigslist is closed
Google has blackened out their name, but searches still work
Wikipedia works normally, even when I click on the english link.
Is this coming from the right or is it bypartisan? I know the House Bill SOPA was introduced by a Republican.
PIPA Video
What You Need To Know @ CBS News.
Is this coming from the right or is it bypartisan? I know the House Bill SOPA was introduced by a Republican.
PIPA Video
What You Need To Know @ CBS News.
Because House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) told SOPA opponent Darrell Issa (R-CA) this weekend that SOPA will not come up for a vote until consensus on the bill is achieved. Prior to Rep. Cantor’s assurance that SOPA would not come up for consideration before the House, it appeared likely that the bill — which had broad support in the House — would be voted on, and pass.
Since it is unlikely that anything close to consensus will be achieved anytime soon, the threat of SOPA’s passage in the near future is extremely low. That said, the bill is not completely dead, and could be revived at anytime.
PIPA, on the other hand, is still very much alive. It has already passed through committee hearings — a step further than SOPA ever took. And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has so far stood firm on bringing PIPA up for a vote before the full Senate on January 24.
Does PIPA have a good chance of becoming law?
Unclear. Currently, the bill still has bipartisan support in the Senate, but it is growing weaker by the day. This past weekend, six Republican senators wrote a letter to Sen. Reid, asking him to postpone a vote on the bill.
And the White House issued a statement declaring that it “will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet,” essentially threatening veto of either SOPA or PIPA, if one of these bills managed to make it all the way to President Obama’s desk.

This whole blackout thing would have a much bigger effect if y**p**n took part. :24:
lets hope it doesn't get revived once they squash it then. US needs to do the world a favour and butt out of every ones business so much.
lets hope it doesn't get revived once they squash it then. US needs to do the world a favour and butt out of every ones business so much.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.