Which one is worse?

Users who are viewing this thread

Chimera

New Member
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Neither of these moves makes alot of people happy....but, which do you feel is more rediculous?


"Bush Expected To Nominate Industry Lobbyist To Head CPSC

baroody.jpg
President Bush is expected to nominate the chief lobbyist for the National Association of Manufacturers, Michael Baroody, to chair the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The CPSC has left semi-neutered status, opting for the full procedure. ConsumerAffairs.com writes:

  • "Because of Baroody's Republican ties and history of opposing strong safety regulation, his appointment is unlikely to be popular with the Democratic-controlled Congress."

The President plans to install Baroody over President's Day weekend as a recess appointment. The recess appointment, which is usually reserved at the end of a session or during the Senate's summer recess, will be effective until the adjournment of the 110th Congress in 2008. After that, if the Senate doesn't confirm the nominee, the position again becomes vacant."


"
GOP Objects to Jefferson Appointment


GOP Objects to Pelosi Choice of Jefferson for Slot on Homeland Security Panel


//
092cb607-b42f-48bd-991f-b10728e146a7_sp.jpeg




By DEVLIN BARRETT

WASHINGTON Feb 16, 2007 (AP)— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who stripped embattled Rep. William Jefferson of his seat on a powerful tax committee last year, has decided to put him on the Homeland Security panel, infuriating some Republicans who charge he may be a security risk.
Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat, was kicked off the Ways and Means Committee amid a federal bribery probe, yet still won re-election to a ninth term.
Pelosi is giving him a seat on the panel after Jefferson was outspoken in his criticism of the homeland security agencies that responded to Hurricane Katrina. His appointment must still be formally approved by the rest of the House Democrats.
 
  • 2
    Replies
  • 231
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

ngdawg

New Member
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Can we say 'asskissing'? I knew that you could.....
I've always thought it one of the more despicable facts of politics that the partisan favortism and blantant palm greasing is so acceptable. I see no good coming out of either action-how the hell do you appoint someone who is in the midst of a bribery investigation to Homeland Security anyway???? Wonder how much he bribed Pelosi.....
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't particularly like the first one. There are plenty of qualified people out there that won't cause a congresional temper tantrum. The one that seems worse is William Jefferson. You don't have to like the other guy, but they didn't find thousands of dollars of bribery cash in his freezer, and his defense wasn't "Congressmen need to be able to keep secrets... bla bla bla."
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top