Minor Axis
Well-Known Member
George W Bush enacted tax cuts in the traditional Republican way. If you recall, Ronald Reagan did the same thing and we had the first huge deficits since WWII. All through the 60's and predominantly Democratic rule we as a country lived within our means. Is there anyone here who feels it is highly ironic that the Republican Party claims to be the fiscally responsible ones? They are most irresponsible when the reason they offer for voting for them is that they will cut your taxes without any kind of a discussion about what we should expect from our government with our tax dollars. That is all you need to know, vote for me and I'll lower your taxes. (It's called pandering). I can't guarantee you a job with decent pay and benefits but don't think about that. (BTW I support the idea that any entitlement program must be sustainable.)
Allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire will inject $3 trillion into government revenue over a 10 year period. It is that simple but what you'll hear from the Republicans is them screaming like stuck pigs although by most accounts the tax rates under Clinton were reasonable. What they refuse to recognize is that the current deficit is too large to simply outgrow by stimulating the economy with good deals for the rich.
Here is a link to the Rice Thresher, the Student Newspaper of Rice University. But what do they know? They are just a bunch of idealistic students:
Allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire will inject $3 trillion into government revenue over a 10 year period. It is that simple but what you'll hear from the Republicans is them screaming like stuck pigs although by most accounts the tax rates under Clinton were reasonable. What they refuse to recognize is that the current deficit is too large to simply outgrow by stimulating the economy with good deals for the rich.
Here is a link to the Rice Thresher, the Student Newspaper of Rice University. But what do they know? They are just a bunch of idealistic students:
Currently, the U.S. deficit is more than 10 percent of its GDP. By removing the tax cuts, government revenue will increase by $3 trillion over 10 years and, as Peter Orszag, former head of the Office of Management and Budget, noted, "will reduce our deficit to a sustainable 3 percent of GDP […] and pretty much solve the deficit problem in the medium term."
On the contrary, if we extend the tax cuts, Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf noted that our economy will not be helped in the long run. In fact, he said, "Lower tax revenues will increase budget deficits and thereby government borrowing, which crowds out investment." Simply put, extending the Bush tax cuts augments the U.S. deficit crisis and hurts the U.S. economy in the long run. The most common argument against allowing the tax cuts to expire is that during a recession, tax increases hurt Americans who are already struggling. This is true to a certain extent - removing tax cuts will hurt some Americans - but maintaining the tax cuts is not the best means of helping Americans regain their jobs and livelihoods.
Last edited by a moderator: