UK Troops Return Basra To Iraqis

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
UK troops return Basra to Iraqis


British troops have transferred control of Basra province to the Iraqi authorities, four-and-a-half years after the invasion. The handover marks a significant milestone towards Britain's final withdrawal from southern Iraq.
Maj Gen Graham Binns, who led British troops into the city in 2003, said it had "begun to regain its strength".
Iraq's National Security Adviser, Dr Mowaffak al-Rubaie, said the "historic" day marked a "victory for Iraq".

In a ceremony at Basra airport, British and Iraqi representatives signed a memorandum of understanding to formalise the handover.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who was present, said Britain would remain a "committed friend" to Iraq.
"Our aim is to see an Iraq run by Iraqis for all Iraqis," he said.
Dr al-Rubaie thanked British troops for their role in protecting the city from insurgents, retraining Iraqi soldiers and rebuilding the economy.
He also praised the "sacrifices" made by the people of Basra.
"This means a victory for Iraq and a defeat for its enemies," he said.
Backseat role
Iraqi troops will now be responsible for controlling insurgents in the area, with British troops in a backseat role.


Maj Gen Binns said Iraqi security forces had proved they were ready to take over, but the recent reduction in violence must "continue and improve" if Basra was to realise its "enormous potential".
"I came to rid Basra of its enemies and I now formally hand Basra back to its friends," he added.
British troops will now only get involved in combat if they themselves are attacked or if Iraqi commanders call for support.
The 4,500 British troops still in Iraq will focus on training Iraqi forces. UK troop numbers are set to be reduced to 2,500 from the spring.
The governor of Basra, Mohammed al-Waili, said he wanted to create "an arms-free city".
"The arms and weapons should be in the hands of the armed forces only," he added.




BBC correspondent Andrew North said despite question marks over Iraqi security forces, especially the police, British commanders believed it was best for Iraqi forces to take the lead.
Mr Miliband told the BBC there had been a "massive" reduction in insurgent activity in the last six months, although "common criminal violence" still needed to be addressed.
And he said Iraq was still a "very, very violent" place, adding: "We are not handing over a land of milk and honey.
"Our troops retain the capacity to intervene again should there be a breakdown of order."
Major General Patrick Cordingley, who commanded UK troops in the first Gulf War, said ordinary British soldiers in Iraq felt they had done "a very good job in extremely difficult conditions".
The most important task now in Basra, he said, was to improve the infrastructure.
'Home quicker'
Basra is the ninth of Iraq's 18 provinces to resume responsibility for its own security and the fourth to be handed over by British forces after Muthanna, Maysan and Dhi Qar.
In a poll of 1,000 Basra residents for BBC Newsnight, more than 85% said they believed British troops have had a negative effect on the Iraqi province since 2003.
But two-thirds thought security would improve following the handover.
Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon was killed in Iraq in 2004, has campaigned against the presence of British troops there.



She told the BBC: "I'm not saying they've not achieved anything, I just don't think they should have gone in the first place.
"We're proud of every one of them for what they have done, but I think they should have been home a lot quicker."
Col Bob Stewart, former British commander with UN forces in Bosnia, told BBC News 24 that Britain's only real achievement in Iraq had been to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
"We've got rid of Saddam, but we haven't given the Iraqis a great life," he said.
"If you were to actually grade it, one to 10, from the point of view of someone who lives in Basra... probably we would score it about three."
Maj Mike Shearer said: "We have never pretended that we were going to hand over a state that resembled Surrey.
"We've always said that we would hand over the province when it was manageable for the Iraqi security forces, and it is just that."
Three months ago, British troops pulled back from Basra city to their airport base.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who visited British troops in Iraq last weekend, said Iraq now had a democratic government and that violence was down 90% in recent months.


Story from BBC NEWS:

Good to see things moving in the right direction, I just hope this isn't too soon.
 
  • 9
    Replies
  • 387
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Yet another in a long line of examples of Briton leading the way.

Your guys are doing great work over there Pete. Your nation has much to be proud of. :nod:
 

Ria

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,054
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
UK troops return Basra to Iraqis


British troops have transferred control of Basra province to the Iraqi authorities, four-and-a-half years after the invasion. The handover marks a significant milestone towards Britain's final withdrawal from southern Iraq.
Maj Gen Graham Binns, who led British troops into the city in 2003, said it had "begun to regain its strength".
Iraq's National Security Adviser, Dr Mowaffak al-Rubaie, said the "historic" day marked a "victory for Iraq".

In a ceremony at Basra airport, British and Iraqi representatives signed a memorandum of understanding to formalise the handover.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who was present, said Britain would remain a "committed friend" to Iraq.
"Our aim is to see an Iraq run by Iraqis for all Iraqis," he said.
Dr al-Rubaie thanked British troops for their role in protecting the city from insurgents, retraining Iraqi soldiers and rebuilding the economy.
He also praised the "sacrifices" made by the people of Basra.
"This means a victory for Iraq and a defeat for its enemies," he said.
Backseat role
Iraqi troops will now be responsible for controlling insurgents in the area, with British troops in a backseat role.


Maj Gen Binns said Iraqi security forces had proved they were ready to take over, but the recent reduction in violence must "continue and improve" if Basra was to realise its "enormous potential".
"I came to rid Basra of its enemies and I now formally hand Basra back to its friends," he added.
British troops will now only get involved in combat if they themselves are attacked or if Iraqi commanders call for support.
The 4,500 British troops still in Iraq will focus on training Iraqi forces. UK troop numbers are set to be reduced to 2,500 from the spring.
The governor of Basra, Mohammed al-Waili, said he wanted to create "an arms-free city".
"The arms and weapons should be in the hands of the armed forces only," he added.




BBC correspondent Andrew North said despite question marks over Iraqi security forces, especially the police, British commanders believed it was best for Iraqi forces to take the lead.
Mr Miliband told the BBC there had been a "massive" reduction in insurgent activity in the last six months, although "common criminal violence" still needed to be addressed.
And he said Iraq was still a "very, very violent" place, adding: "We are not handing over a land of milk and honey.
"Our troops retain the capacity to intervene again should there be a breakdown of order."
Major General Patrick Cordingley, who commanded UK troops in the first Gulf War, said ordinary British soldiers in Iraq felt they had done "a very good job in extremely difficult conditions".
The most important task now in Basra, he said, was to improve the infrastructure.
'Home quicker'
Basra is the ninth of Iraq's 18 provinces to resume responsibility for its own security and the fourth to be handed over by British forces after Muthanna, Maysan and Dhi Qar.
In a poll of 1,000 Basra residents for BBC Newsnight, more than 85% said they believed British troops have had a negative effect on the Iraqi province since 2003.
But two-thirds thought security would improve following the handover.
Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon was killed in Iraq in 2004, has campaigned against the presence of British troops there.



She told the BBC: "I'm not saying they've not achieved anything, I just don't think they should have gone in the first place.
"We're proud of every one of them for what they have done, but I think they should have been home a lot quicker."
Col Bob Stewart, former British commander with UN forces in Bosnia, told BBC News 24 that Britain's only real achievement in Iraq had been to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
"We've got rid of Saddam, but we haven't given the Iraqis a great life," he said.
"If you were to actually grade it, one to 10, from the point of view of someone who lives in Basra... probably we would score it about three."
Maj Mike Shearer said: "We have never pretended that we were going to hand over a state that resembled Surrey.
"We've always said that we would hand over the province when it was manageable for the Iraqi security forces, and it is just that."
Three months ago, British troops pulled back from Basra city to their airport base.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who visited British troops in Iraq last weekend, said Iraq now had a democratic government and that violence was down 90% in recent months.


Story from BBC NEWS:

Good to see things moving in the right direction, I just hope this isn't too soon.

Oh, they'll be some cock up to come out of this though. There's usually a reason/scam behind decisions like this, but with our government being so closed about things and secretive, who knows what it'll be or when we get to know about it. Those men and women, did all that time and it is them only who can hold their heads up high.
 

Ria

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,054
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Yet another in a long line of examples of Briton leading the way.

Your guys are doing great work over there Pete. Your nation has much to be proud of. :nod:

You wanna try living here - it'd be a different story then...:(
 

Ria

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,054
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
To be honest, our decision to go into Iraq in the first place is something I find very shameful.


Yes that is how I feel too, but had there been a referendum, well, it wouldn't have happened eh?

We don't get freedom of speech at all, yet they try to kid the rest of the world things are better here and more liberated than they actually are.

Nope, we are told (in most things that we should know about, only told eventually).

Sickens me the way this country this. :mad
 

debbie t

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,888
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
im ashamed too.we broke international law and i too am sure that a referendum would have changed things,however thats why they didnt dare have a referendum isnt it.
thank god blaires gone ,he was a weezle up the arse of bush,and it makes me to cringe to think that this government supposedly represents me.
ill not be happy till we have total withdrawll
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
You wanna try living here - it'd be a different story then...:(

I was born and will die an American obviously, but would have had no beefs with being born a Briton. As a student of history, and as a modern day traveler, I can tell you that I enjoy GB more than almost any place on Earth.

Even when times are tough, the British are capable of soldiering on like no other. From where I stand, you have MUCH to be proud of.

As for me and my house, we are EXTREMELY impressed by your nation.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,390Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top