TSA: Some gov't officials to skip airport security

Users who are viewing this thread

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
WASHINGTON – Cabinet secretaries, top congressional leaders and an exclusive group of senior U.S. officials are exempt from toughened new airport screening procedures when they fly commercially with government-approved federal security details.

Aviation security officials would not name those who can skip the controversial screening, but other officials said those VIPs range from top officials like Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and FBI Director Robert Mueller to congressional leaders like incoming House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who avoided security before a recent flight from Washington's Reagan National Airport.

The heightened new security procedures by the Transportation Security Administration, which involve either a scan by a full-body detector or an intimate personal pat-down, have spurred passenger outrage in the lead-up to the Thanksgiving holiday airport crush.

On Friday, the TSA exempted pilots from the new procedures; flight attendants received the same privilege on Tuesday, TSA spokesman Nicholas Kimball confirmed. Both groups must show photo ID and go through metal detectors. If that sets off an alarm, they may still get a pat-down in some cases, he said. The rules apply to pilots and flight attendants in uniform when they're traveling.

While passengers have no choice but to submit to either the detector or what some complain is an intrusive pat-down, some senior government officials can opt out if they fly accompanied by government security guards approved by the TSA.

"Government officials traveling with federal law enforcement security details are screened at airports under a specialized screening protocol, which includes identity verification," Kimball said. This allows the officials to skip the airport security checkpoints.

The TSA would not explain why it makes these exceptions. But many of the exempted government officials have gone through several levels of security clearances, including FBI background checks. Armed security details eliminate the need for an additional layer of security at airports.

Some members of President Barack Obama's Cabinet, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, travel almost exclusively on government or military planes.

Top officials like Geithner, Mueller and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid travel with security details and skip airport checkpoints, aides said. The second-ranking Senate Democrat, Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, and the House Democratic whip, Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, also have security, but they typically undergo regular screening with other passengers, aides said.

Spokesmen for both Boehner and current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., would not discuss security arrangements. But under a policy started by the Bush administration after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a military aircraft is made available to the speaker, third in line to the presidency, for all official flight needs.

Spokesmen for Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and outgoing House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland said they fly commercial, but would not detail security arrangements.

Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer said the only members of Congress with protective details are leaders, "based upon a threat analysis" conducted by the U.S. Capitol Police. Gainer added that members "with sworn protection" are able to avoid security because "their secure posture is affirmed by the law enforcement process established by TSA."

The TSA's administrator, John Pistole, is treated like any other traveler when he flies, waiting in security lines and walking through X-ray machines, including the full-body imagers, his spokesman said. Senior White House officials David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett and John Brennan, the president's homeland security adviser, do the same, officials said.

___

Associated Press writers Laurie Kellman, Martin Crutsinger, Pete Yost and Larry Margasak contributed to this report.
 
  • 12
    Replies
  • 297
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
No lawmaker should be exempt from the laws they pass. The goddamn president of the United States should have to go through the pat-down and watch his wife and daughters do the same. They are citizens just like everyone else (damn near literally, but that's another thread) and do not deserve such special privileges.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
No lawmaker should be exempt from the laws they pass. The goddamn president of the United States should have to go through the pat-down and watch his wife and daughters do the same. They are citizens just like everyone else (damn near literally, but that's another thread) and do not deserve such special privileges.

they should indeed, in fact I think that seeing as they agree to this nonsense, they and their families should be forced to go through with it, to let them know what it's like for their constituents.
 

pjbleek

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,839
Reaction score
76
Tokenz
795.15z
better yet let the lawmakers be the ones to pat you down and take your money...wait they already do that....
silly me
:D :D :D :D :D :D
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
they should indeed, in fact I think that seeing as they agree to this nonsense, they and their families should be forced to go through with it, to let them know what it's like for their constituents.
Maybe they should be TSA screened any time they enter the floor. After all, aren't they all targets?

better yet let the lawmakers be the ones to pat you down and take your money...wait they already do that....
silly me
:D :D :D :D :D :D
lol.gif
Repped!
 

pjbleek

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,839
Reaction score
76
Tokenz
795.15z
just thought of this, if these TSA peoples find someone carrying bomb making items and they stop this person from getting aboard a plane you know they would never say this. if they did it would be fruitless because the effort was made and then America can say that these tests would not be needed. I am so for these body scans, pat downs, etc. if it means I get to my destination safe and sound then that is all that matters. we live in a whole new world and people have got to wake up to think it wont happen again, just truly silly thinking.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Not everyone is screened, it has been that way forever.

For your perspective, there was a time when flight crews bypassed security 100% of the time. Then in 1987 a fired airline employee (not aircrew) smuggled a gun avoiding security, as in did not go through screening but passed through a non secured area. In flight he shot the pilots on a Pacific Southwest flight and it crashed. After this Elizabeth Dole in all her wisdom decided that aircrew must be screened. As one point a pilot indignantly said (paraphrased) before being arrested, "this is stupid, we could crash the plane if we wanted to!" I agree. If you are going to let pilots fly the plane you are going to have to trust them. Even today there are airports where flight crews go through the back door with no screening. It's up to the local airport administrator with approval of the FAA. And there is a pilot program where a database that is used to identify pilots for access to the flight deck jump seat is now being used to identify pilots allowing them to bypass security screening.

As far as big wigs in government bypassing security, I'd say that is a given. I don't think anyone would classify them as a danger to commercial aviation. It is the unknown threat that is the danger.

This has been discussed in another thread, but I'll say it again. The issue of pat down did not come up until they came out with these new body scanners. Before you had to go through a metal detector and if you beeped, you got wanded. No problem. I also like the idea of chemical sniffers that blow puffs of air on you and detect residual explosives. For some reason TSA has decided that if you don't go through a scanner that shows your body to a screener, then you deserve a pat down touching what you like to think are your personal body parts. I don't agree with this.

For the body scanners, I thought they were working on a software fix to display a generic body, not your body? I see this as the solution. Being groped is not appropriate IMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

darkcgi

Glorified Maniac
Messages
7,475
Reaction score
448
Tokenz
0.28z
I think there is a fine line where its important to run security checks on certain people.
But to make sure it is safe for everyone it would be best to check everyone
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top