Before I get cracking I want to point out this is neither a 9/11 conspiracy thread nor a healthcare thread, but more about the current hatred being leveled at Obama's administration and the power of the media in shaping public opinion. Here's the video that started it:
YouTube - 20/20 Hindsight: Censorship on the Frontline (4/9)
The implications of this video reminded me of Chomsky's theory about the media "manufacturing consent".
Given that Obama's healthcare bill would cost the US some $1trillion over ten years and the Pentagon announced the day before 9/11 they had $2.3trillion go missing (in one year), does anyone have any idea why people (the teabaggers etc) are so mad over the healthcare reform but for the most part this far larger amount of money that has so callously disappeared from the public coffers has been kept out of the common discourse?
This certainly bolsters Chomsky's theory regarding the mainstream media acting as propagandists for the govt and ruling elites as it simply doesn't make sense for this not to be receiving considerably more attention than the cheap by comparison healthcare reform.
Given also the information that's recently come to light regarding the part of the pentagon that was destroyed on 9/11 conveniently being the same part of the building responsible for auditing this missing money, should this also not be raising eyebrows in line with some kind of cover-up?
In a video I posted recently, where Chomsky explains that the hatred being leveled at the govt is indeed valid, but perhaps misguided, I think this is a shining example of that.
I'm not after an argument here, I'm after genuine thoughts on the subject of the content of the mainstream media and it's effect on shaping public opinion by keeping the focus away from the more serious issues.
-----
Source: Reuters
YouTube - 20/20 Hindsight: Censorship on the Frontline (4/9)
The implications of this video reminded me of Chomsky's theory about the media "manufacturing consent".
Given that Obama's healthcare bill would cost the US some $1trillion over ten years and the Pentagon announced the day before 9/11 they had $2.3trillion go missing (in one year), does anyone have any idea why people (the teabaggers etc) are so mad over the healthcare reform but for the most part this far larger amount of money that has so callously disappeared from the public coffers has been kept out of the common discourse?
This certainly bolsters Chomsky's theory regarding the mainstream media acting as propagandists for the govt and ruling elites as it simply doesn't make sense for this not to be receiving considerably more attention than the cheap by comparison healthcare reform.
Given also the information that's recently come to light regarding the part of the pentagon that was destroyed on 9/11 conveniently being the same part of the building responsible for auditing this missing money, should this also not be raising eyebrows in line with some kind of cover-up?
In a video I posted recently, where Chomsky explains that the hatred being leveled at the govt is indeed valid, but perhaps misguided, I think this is a shining example of that.
I'm not after an argument here, I'm after genuine thoughts on the subject of the content of the mainstream media and it's effect on shaping public opinion by keeping the focus away from the more serious issues.
-----
The House Ways and Means Committee agreed on legislation on Monday that would raise $544 billion over 10 years to pay for the plan's estimated $1 trillion cost in part by raising taxes on the wealthy. Critics say that measure would harm small businesses who fall into this tax category.
Source: Reuters
Last edited by a moderator: