The New Royal Portrait

Users who are viewing this thread

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.12z
Yes, I know no-one really gives a shit about it, myself included but does anyone feel this is a piss poor photo? Considering this is supposed to be a proffesional job, I'm quite shocked with what was turned out.

_53634607_queenelizabeth810.gif
 
  • 26
    Replies
  • 509
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Natasha

La entrepierna de fuego
Valued Contributor
Messages
38,353
Reaction score
257
Tokenz
2,964.30z
yeah very dull, they could have spiced it up a bit...........or sat a bit closer atleast
I was gonna say that, too. It almost looks like they were photographed at separate times and spliced together or something. *shrugs*

I agree, Peter...not a very good photo at all.
 

Siphorous

Anticipation
Messages
7,001
Reaction score
17
Tokenz
199.13z
They look like they can't get far enough away from each other. The composition is totally crap too. I could have done so much better. I don't mind the austere mood that the darkness and lack of lighting gives it but the composition sucks donkey balls.
 

Mystic

OTz's Typo Scouser
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
67
Tokenz
117.24z
yes, terrible shot. Reminds me of the pictures they used to take of dead people. I wonder what the queen had to say about it when she saw it.
 

Racks

Active Member
Messages
554
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.01z
I think the chairs on the right should be cropped out... Just looks cluttery... Overall Its a nice picture
They are seated in a two-seater (love chair)... They both look at ease. Plus with them being an elderly couple I don't really expect um to be hugged up and kissing.
 

HK

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,410
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.18z
Maybe it was meant to be like that. You probably don't get a chance to photograph the Queen if you're crap, and I bet they don't publish it if they really think it's awful either. Perhaps it's supposed to be something different from the usual royal portraits.
 

Siphorous

Anticipation
Messages
7,001
Reaction score
17
Tokenz
199.13z
Maybe it was meant to be like that. You probably don't get a chance to photograph the Queen if you're crap, and I bet they don't publish it if they really think it's awful either. Perhaps it's supposed to be something different from the usual royal portraits.

Whatever their credentials - it's still crap. So if it was meant to be that way, objective achieved.
 

JanieDough

V.I.P User
Messages
14,684
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
I kind of like it...

I like the way they are in the light, but the rest is in the dark - it reminds me of the old time classic paintings. I like that they aren't holding hands or sitting closer - maybe they aren't that close?

The pillow thing does bother me as well.

I also don't like that you can see the Prince's face. I feel like there should have been a slight reflector screen used or something just so you can see something on his face.

I think it's very stark and shows their age, but maybe that's a good thing - it's very documentary instead of romanticized.

Like I said I kind of like it :)
 

Abcinthia

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,469
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.04z
I think they should have been decked out in the Crown Jewels and as much jewellery as possible with Corgis rolling in piles of cash behind them. Just to really show us all she's Queen and she's better than us plebs.

That's what I'd do if I was Queen anyway...
 

JanieDough

V.I.P User
Messages
14,684
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
I think they should have been decked out in the Crown Jewels and as much jewellery as possible with Corgis rolling in piles of cash behind them. Just to really show us all she's Queen and she's better than us plebs.

That's what I'd do if I was Queen anyway...



If I was Queen I would at least have a martini in my hand...gosh!
 
80,546Threads
2,194,803Messages
5,014Members
Back
Top